scholarly journals Demystifying the potential of Global surgery for Public health

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parth Patel ◽  
Usman Garba Kurmi ◽  
Hadiza Abubakar Balkore ◽  
Dattatreya Mukherjee
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Care ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Global Surgery ◽  
Global Level ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Academic Surgeons ◽  
Made In ◽  
Reliable Basis

Remarkable gains have been made in global health in the last 25 years, and surgical care is anintegral component of healthcare systems for countries at all levels of development. Globalsurgery, which global surgery, which comprises clinical, educational, and researchcollaborations to improve surgical care between academic surgeons in high-income countriesand low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and their affiliated academic institutions, hasgrown significantly. Global surgery may resonate most with those in low-or-middle-incomecountries (LCMICs), where basic surgery needs are rarely met, and even the most trivialresource may be hard to obtain on a permanent or reliable basis. Therefore, considering this,this article provides an overview on various factors defining the interface between surgery andpublic health at a global level and discuss future directions.

scholarly journals Globalization of national surgical, obstetric and anesthesia plans: the critical link between health policy and action in global surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Truché ◽  
Haitham Shoman ◽  
Ché L. Reddy ◽  
Desmond T. Jumbam ◽  
Joanna Ashby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Financial Burden ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Obstetric Care ◽  
Global Surgery ◽  
Health System Strengthening ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Private And Public ◽  
Development Goals

AbstractEfforts from the developed world to improve surgical, anesthesia and obstetric care in low- and middle-income countries have evolved from a primarily volunteer mission trip model to a sustainable health system strengthening approach as private and public stakeholders recognize the enormous health toll and financial burden of surgical disease. The National Surgical, Obstetric and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP) has been developed as a policy strategy for countries to address, in part, the health burden of diseases amenable to surgical care, but these plans have not developed in isolation. The NSOAP has become a phenomenon of globalization as a broad range of partners – individuals and institutions – help in both NSOAP formulation, implementation and financing. As the nexus between policy and action in the field of global surgery, the NSOAP reflects a special commitment by state actors to make progress on global goals such as Universal Health Coverage and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. This requires a continued global commitment involving genuine partnerships that embrace the collective strengths of both national and global actors to deliver sustained, safe and affordable high-quality surgical care for all poor, rural and marginalized people.

scholarly journals Barriers to participation in global surgery academic collaborations, and possible solutions: a qualitative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
pp. 1157-1165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parisa Nicole Fallah ◽  
Mark Bernstein
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Global Surgery ◽  
High Income ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Barriers To Participation ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

OBJECTIVEThere is a global lack of access to surgical care, and this issue disproportionately affects those in low- and middle-income countries. Global surgery academic collaborations (GSACs) between surgeons in high-income countries and those in low- and middle-income countries are one possible sustainable way to address the global surgical need. The objective of this study was to examine the barriers to participation in GSACs and to suggest ways to increase involvement.METHODSA convenience sample of 86 surgeons, anesthesiologists, other physicians, residents, fellows, and nurses from the US, Canada, and Norway was used. Participants were all health care providers from multiple specialties and multiple academic centers with varied involvement in GSACs. More than half of the participants were neurosurgeons. Participants were interviewed in person or over Skype in Toronto over the course of 2 months by using a predetermined set of open-ended questions. Thematic content analysis was used to evaluate the participants’ responses.RESULTSBased on the data, 3 main themes arose that pointed to individual, community, and system barriers for involvement in GSACs. Individual barriers included loss of income, family commitments, young career, responsibility to local patients, skepticism of global surgery efforts, ethical concerns, and safety concerns. Community barriers included insufficient mentorship and lack of support from colleagues. System barriers included lack of time, minimal academic recognition, insufficient awareness, insufficient administrative support and organization, and low political and funding support.CONCLUSIONSSteps can be taken to address some of these barriers and to increase the involvement of surgeons from high-income countries in GSACs. This could lead to a necessary scale-up of global surgery efforts that may help increase worldwide access to surgical care.

scholarly journals The 12 trillion dollar question: is global surgery cost effective?

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 186-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
AM Dube ◽  
R Patel
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Care ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Global Surgery ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Financial Gain ◽  
Global Access ◽  
Low And Middle Income

This article considers the financial gain of providing global access to safe and affordable surgical care, especially in low and middle income countries.

scholarly journals Barriers to training in laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 004947552199818
Author(s):  
Ellen Wilkinson ◽  
Noel Aruparayil ◽  
J Gnanaraj ◽  
Julia Brown ◽  
David Jayne
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Local Access ◽  
And Training ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Laparoscopic surgery has the potential to improve care in resource-deprived low- and-middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aims to analyse the barriers to training in laparoscopic surgery in LMICs. Medline, Embase, Global Health and Web of Science were searched using ‘LMIC’, ‘Laparoscopy’ and ‘Training’. Two researchers screened results with mutual agreement. Included papers were in English, focused on abdominal laparoscopy and training in LMICs. PRISMA guidelines were followed; 2992 records were screened, and 86 full-text articles reviewed to give 26 key papers. Thematic grouping identified seven key barriers: funding; availability and maintenance of equipment; local access to experienced laparoscopic trainers; stakeholder dynamics; lack of knowledge on effective training curricula; surgical departmental structure and practical opportunities for trainees. In low-resource settings, technological advances may offer low-cost solutions in the successful implementation of laparoscopic training and improve access to surgical care.

scholarly journals Tobacco intervention research in low- and middle-income countries: lessons learned and future directions

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth D. Ward
Keyword(s):  
Tobacco Control ◽  
Tobacco Use ◽  
Tobacco Cessation ◽  
Tobacco Dependence ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Country Level ◽  
Tobacco Intervention

Treating tobacco dependence is paramount for global tobacco control efforts, but is often overshadowed by other policy priorities. As stated by Jha (2009), “cessation by current smokers is the only practical way to avoid a substantial proportion of tobacco deaths worldwide before 2050.” Its importance is codified in Article 14 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), and in the WHO's MPOWER package of effective country-level policies. Unfortunately, only 15% of the world's population have access to appropriate cessation support (WHO, 2015). Moreover, parties to the FCTC have implemented only 51% of the indicators within Article 14, on average, which is far lower than many other articles (WHO, 2014). Further, commenting on the use of “O” measures (Offer help to quit tobacco use) in the MPOWER acronym, WHO recently concluded, “while there has been improvement in implementing comprehensive tobacco cessation services, this is nonetheless a most under-implemented MPOWER measure in terms of the number of countries that have fully implemented it” (WHO, 2015). To the detriment of global tobacco control efforts, only one in eight countries provides comprehensive cost-covered services, only one in four provide some cost coverage for nicotine replacement therapy, and fewer than one third provide a toll-free quit line (WHO, 2015).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document