scholarly journals Family Physicians Improve Patient Health Care Quality and Outcomes

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 617-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Bowman ◽  
A. V. Neale
Author(s):  
Jasmine M. Greer ◽  
Kendall J. Burdick ◽  
Arman R. Chowdhury ◽  
Joseph J. Schlesinger

Hospital alarms today indicate urgent clinical need, but they are seldom “true.” False alarms are contributing to the ever-increasing issue of alarm fatigue, or desensitization, among doctors and nurses. Alarm fatigue is a high-priority health care concern because of its potential to compromise health care quality and inflict harm on patients. To address this concern, we have engineered Dynamic Alarm Systems for Hospitals (D.A.S.H.), a dynamic alarm system that self-regulates alarm loudness based on the environmental noise level and incorporates differentiable and learnable alarms. D.A.S.H., with its ability to adapt to environmental noise and encode nuanced physiological information, may improve patient safety and attenuate clinician alarm fatigue.


Author(s):  
Hugo Carradinha

The provision of affordable, high-quality health care is a political priority in Europe, and expenditure on pharmaceutical products is an important component of total health-care costs. The search by governments and health insurers to reduce health-care budgets has shown the importance of generic medicines, which are acquiring greater relevance. Generic medicines signify clear long-term savings to national health-care budgets.1 In this context, generic medicines are an essential part of the equation to the sustainability of the EU health-care system. Although the short-term results and price-cutting policies are only recent additions to the retail pharmaceutical market, the latest evidence shows that tendering and similar procurement systems play a negative role in patient health-care quality, government budgets and generic medicines industry sustainability and the capacity to continue to supply affordable prices.


2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. E2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony L. Asher ◽  
Paul C. McCormick ◽  
Nathan R. Selden ◽  
Zoher Ghogawala ◽  
Matthew J. McGirt

Patient care data will soon inform all areas of health care decision making and will define clinical performance. Organized neurosurgery believes that prospective, systematic tracking of practice patterns and patient outcomes will allow neurosurgeons to improve the quality and efficiency and, ultimately, the value of care. In support of this mission, the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, in cooperation with a broad coalition of other neurosurgical societies including the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Neurological Surgeons, and American Board of Neurological Surgery, created the NeuroPoint Alliance (NPA), a not-for-profit corporation, in 2008. The NPA coordinates a variety of national projects involving the acquisition, analysis, and reporting of clinical data from neurosurgical practice using online technologies. It was designed to meet the health care quality and related research needs of individual neurosurgeons and neurosurgical practices, national organizations, health care plans, biomedical industry, and government agencies. To meet the growing need for tools to measure and promote high-quality care, NPA collaborated with several national stakeholders to create an unprecedented program: the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD). This resource will allow any US neurosurgeon, practice group, or hospital system to contribute to and access aggregate quality and outcomes data through a centralized, nationally coordinated clinical registry. This paper describes the practical and scientific justifications for a national neurosurgical registry; the conceptualization, design, development, and implementation of the N2QOD; and the likely role of prospective, cooperative clinical data collection systems in evolving systems of neurosurgical training, continuing education, research, public reporting, and maintenance of certification.


2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine de Bienassis ◽  
Solvejg Kristensen ◽  
Emily Hewlett ◽  
David Roe ◽  
Jan Mainz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Achieving people-centred health care systems requires new and innovative strategies to capture information about whether, and to what degree, health care is successful in improving health from the perspective of the patient. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) can bring some of these new insights, and are increasingly used in research, clinical care, and policymaking. Methods This paper reflects the ongoing discussions and findings of the OECD PaRIS Working Group on Patient-reported Indicators for Mental Health Care. Results The OECD has been measuring quality of care for mental health conditions over the last 14 years through the Health Care Quality and Outcomes (HCQO) program; nonetheless, information on how persons with mental health problems value the services they receive, and impact of the services, remains limited. As of 2018, a survey from the OECD showed that only five of the twelve countries surveyed (Australia, Israel, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom) reported PROMs and PREMs collection on a regular basis in mental health settings. The paper details some of the challenges specific to the collection and use of PROMs and PREMs in mental health care, and examples from countries which have implemented comprehensive programmes to gather information about PROMs and PREMs for individuals receiving mental health services. Conclusions Given the health and economic impact of mental ill-health across all OECD countries, there is significant value to being able to assess the quality and outcomes of care in this area using internationally-comparable measures. Continued international harmonisation of PROMs and PREMs for mental health through international coordination is a key way to facilitate the sharing of national experiences, promote the use of PROMs and PREMs, and create meaningful indicators for national and international benchmarking.


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42
Author(s):  
Juli C. Maxworthy

The health care quality and patient safety movement has evolved rapidly during the past 10 years largely as a result of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, “To Err is Human.” Patient safety teams are using a collaborative model to improve patient outcomes. Diffusion of improvement-oriented innovations is a major challenge facing health care. Utilizing a tool to measure innovativeness, a 39-hospital patient safety collaborative was evaluated for their “Innovativeness Quotient.” Findings showed that 75.5% of the members of the collaborative who completed the survey were innovators/early adopters compared to 16% as described for the general population. The application and implications of this project are described.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document