scholarly journals Replicable quality across every channel: the Busara research agenda on methods in the Global South

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Busara Lab Busara Lab ◽  
Winnie Mughogho ◽  
Nicholas Calbraith Owsley

Any act of measurement brings with it concerns about data quality and replication. Yet very little of this work has focused in detail on the specific measurement and data quality concerns related to conducting research in the Global South. Busara operates both remote and in-person data collection, employing everything from photovoice to laboratory ‘games’ to list experiments. Across both of these domains, we will build on our long tradition of careful testing of measures and techniques to ensure high levels of access, response, attention and comprehension. We will examine what methodological practices work best for various populations, especially those with the least social power, in the Global South, to maintain data quality (this differs from our closely related program of work on cross-cultural validation of behavioral science constructs). Busara is well-positioned to do this, and to disseminate protocols for the use of these methods.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 87-99
Author(s):  
Luis Felipe Dávila ◽  
Caroline Doyle

High levels of violence and conflict in Latin America have attracted the interests of local and international researchers to further understand how to reduce this violence and prevent current and future outbreaks. Conducting research in any environment is challenging. However, the obstacles facing not only researcher safety but also data collection methods are particularly complex in settings with high levels of violence and conflict. This article contributes to the methodological literature, as it provides reflections from two researchers, an insider from the Global South and an outsider from the Global North, each collecting data in Medellín, Colombia. It also argues the importance of collaboration between Global North and Global South researchers investigating violence and insecurity.


Author(s):  
Linda Dorsten ◽  
Yuhui Li

A recent article in this journal discusses ways to manage uncertainty when the research field abruptly and significantly changes on researchers working inside their own society (Kacen & Chaitin, 2006). Our essay extends this discussion by asking: How do researchers manage ambiguous, conflictual, and rapidly changing events when they engage in study outside their own society? We describe three aspects of our data collection experience that coincidentally began one week before the Urumqi city, Xinjiang, China, riots of 2009 in which over 200 people were reported as killed and several thousand injured: (a). our original research agenda and the uncertain situation in Xinjiang in recent years; (b). how we modified our research project and approach to data collection; and (c). what we learned that can contribute to knowledge about conducting research under ambiguous, potentially unstable and rapidly changing socio-political conditions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 414-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rense Lange ◽  
Everton de Oliveira Maraldi ◽  
Wellington Zangari ◽  
Vanessa Corredato ◽  
Fatima Regina Machado ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Sarbescu ◽  
Delia Virga ◽  
Coralia Sulea ◽  
Ilona van Beek ◽  
Wilmar Schaufeli

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1349-1363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio A. Garcia-Barrera ◽  
Justin E. Karr ◽  
Victor Duran ◽  
Esther Direnfeld ◽  
David A. Pineda

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lleo Ana Maria Gonzalez ◽  
Mauro Boronat Cortes ◽  
Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen ◽  
Carlos Rodriguez Perez ◽  
AEse Krogh Rasmussen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document