scholarly journals Analisis Kelayakan Isi Buku Rangkuman Anatomi Umum Lengkap Edisi IV Semester 2 Bab 3 Fakultas Kedokteran UNS

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhana Fawwazy Ilyas
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Education Program ◽  
Learning Material ◽  
Clinical Knowledge ◽  
Fourth Edition ◽  
Fundamental Knowledge ◽  
Medical Education Program ◽  
Data Arrangement

Anatomy has become one of the most fundamental knowledge in a medical education program and it's comprehensions are significantly important to understand another branch of clinical knowledge. General anatomy textbook or it's fancy as RAUL (Rangkuman Anatomi Umum Lengkap), arguably, got to be the main source of anatomy learning in the Faculty of Medicine, still need some evaluations. This research aim is to evaluate the eligibility of the fourth edition of the general anatomy textbook in chapter three. This study encompasses qualitative analysis which depends on its book. One technique that is being used in this research is qualitative analysis approaches with a mutually-related interactive model. The content eligibility was analyzed in depth with theory and particular data based instrument which come from various sources. The feasibility of content was assessed in terms of the suitability of the material description with KI and KD, the accuracy of the material, and supporting learning material. Given data was analyzed inductively with collected data, data reduction, data arrangement, data withdrawal, and verification of conclusion. Judging from data analysis, it can be concluded that the content of general anatomy textbook "RAUL", fourth edition, chapter three, Faculty of Medicine Sebelas Maret University, is very feasible with the value of 95% according to twelve points of the assessment aspects. It is hoped that this research can become a reference in evaluating the following textbook and contribute for anatomy learning as well.

scholarly journals Analisis Kelayakan Buku Ajar “Rangkuman Anatomi Umum Lengkap” di FK UNS terhadap Pemahaman Mahasiswa

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
verren nadhifa
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Medical Student ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Learning Material ◽  
Fourth Edition ◽  
The Core ◽  
A Value ◽  
Clinical Cases

Anatomy is indeed the core of scientific knowledge that has been crucial in medical education for decades. Without its discernment way thoroughly and enormously, the medical student would get to rocky on diagnosing the patient's disease or other clinical cases. Conceivably, studying anatomy has been very tangled for most of the medical students, and for that reason, it is needed a require to produce compatible anatomy textbook. General anatomy textbook or commonly entitled as RAUL (Rangkuman Anatomi Umum Lengkap), is an anatomy learning textbook that was well-produced by the Anatomy Departement of Faculty of Medicine, Sebelas Maret University. This book has been one of a kind and has become the main source for the student to learn anatomy material. Furthermore, even though this book has been at the bits of students for the last few years, it still needed some evaluations. This research aim is to analyze the content advisability from the general anatomy textbook "RAUL" in chapter two, the fourth edition, 2019. This research encompasses qualitative techniques with data-analysis approaches. Content advisability is being judged based on three indicators, such as (1) the suitability of the material description with KI and KD, (2) the accuracy of the material, and (3) supporting learning material. Given data shows that this textbook is compatible as a main source of anatomy learning with a value of 91,7% according to twelve indicators that represent the competence of the textbook. It is hoped that this study provides measurable benefits and evaluations for subsequent anatomy textbooks and can contribute to anatomical learning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document