scholarly journals Abrupt vs. gradual visual onsets in go/no-go sustained attention tasks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Kyle Robison

Two experiments compared both average performance and changes in performance across time in abrupt- and gradual-onset sustained attention tasks. Experiment 1 compared abrupt- and gradual-onset digits. In conditions where the digits onset and offset abruptly and appeared only briefly, similar to typical conditions in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART), participants committed more errors on no-go trials and responded faster overall, indicative of a shift in the speed/accuracy tradeoff toward speed. When the digits abruptly onset but remained on-screen for a longer period of time, there were no differences in no-go error rates, hit rates, or reaction time (RT) variability, but participants still emitted faster RTs overall. Experiment 2 compared abrupt- and gradual-onset images. Similar to Experiment 1, abrupt-onset, short-duration images induced more no-go errors and faster RTs, but also more RT variability and reduced hit rates. In the abrupt-onset, long-duration condition, again the only performance difference was a decrease in average RTs. We discuss implications for using these two types of tasks in sustained attention research.

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 419
Author(s):  
Jari K. Gool ◽  
Ysbrand D. van der Werf ◽  
Gert Jan Lammers ◽  
Rolf Fronczek

Vigilance complaints often occur in people with narcolepsy type 1 and severely impair effective daytime functioning. We tested the feasibility of a three-level sustained attention to response task (SART) paradigm within a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) environment to understand brain architecture underlying vigilance regulation in individuals with narcolepsy type 1. Twelve medication-free people with narcolepsy type 1 and 11 matched controls were included. The SART included four repetitions of a baseline block and two difficulty levels requiring moderate and high vigilance. Outcome measures were between and within-group performance indices on error rates and reaction times, and functional MRI (fMRI) parameters: mean activity during the task and between-group activity differences across the three conditions and related to changes in activation over time (time-on-task) and error-related activity. Patients—but not controls—made significantly more mistakes with increasing difficulty. The modified SART is a feasible MRI vigilance task showing similar task-positive brain activity in both groups within the cingulo-opercular, frontoparietal, arousal, motor, and visual networks. During blocks of higher vigilance demand, patients had significantly lower activation in these regions than controls. Patients had lower error-related activity in the left pre- and postcentral gyrus. The time-on-task activity differences between groups suggest that those with narcolepsy are insufficiently capable of activating attention- and arousal-related regions when transitioning from attention initiation to stable attention, specifically when vigilance demand is high. They also show lower inhibitory motor activity in relation to errors, suggesting impaired executive functioning.


Author(s):  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Yifan Zhang ◽  
Jie Xu

The purpose of this study was to replicate previous behavioral performance results and investigate eye met- rics correlates in the Gradual Onset Continuous Performance Task (gradCPT). Previous research has shown that gradCPT can provide a measurement of fluctuations in sustained attention over time. In this study, 30 participants each completed three eight-minute sessions of gradCPT. “In the zone” and “out of the zone” periods were identified according to the Variance Time Course measure. Patterns of reaction time, d’, and error rates were consistent with previous studies, while criterion scores differed between the two-zone peri- ods. Eye-tracking data indicated that mean and variation of pupil size, saccade duration, saccade peak veloc- ity, and fixation duration were sensitive to the in-the-zone vs. the out-of-the-zone periods. These results sug- gest that some individuals may change their task strategy during out-of-the-zone periods. Eye metrics might be useful indicators for out-of-the-zone performance when behavioral performance metrics were not availa- ble.


Author(s):  
William S. Helton ◽  
Nicole Lopez ◽  
Sarah Tamminga

2011 ◽  
Vol 259 (6) ◽  
pp. 1191-1198 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. P. Hart ◽  
E. M. Dumas ◽  
R. H. A. M. Reijntjes ◽  
K. Hiele ◽  
S. J. A. Bogaard ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen P. Hart ◽  
Eve M. Dumas ◽  
Erik W. van Zwet ◽  
Karin van der Hiele ◽  
Caroline K. Jurgens ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wu ◽  
Struys ◽  
Lochtman

The effect of bilingualism on inhibition control is increasingly under ongoing exploration. The present study primarily investigated the effect of within bilingual factors (i.e., dominance types of Uyghur-Chinese bilinguals) on a Stimulus-Stimulus task (Flanker) and a Stimulus-Response task (Simon). We also compared the bilinguals' performance on each type of cognitive control task in respect to a possible trade-off between speed and accuracy. The findings showed no explicit differences on performance in response time or accuracy among balanced, L1-dominant and L2-dominant bilinguals but balanced bilinguals demonstrated a significant speed-accuracy trade-off in the overall context switching between non-conflict and conflict trials in both cognitive control tasks where monitoring process is highly demanded. Additionally, all bilinguals across all language dominance types showed a trade-off strategy in inhibition during a Stimulus-Stimulus conflict (flanker task). This evidence indicates that the differences of within bilinguals in cognitive control could lie in the monitoring process, while for all bilinguals, inhibition during a Stimulus-Stimulus conflict could be a major component in the mechanism of bilingual language processing.


2020 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 103597
Author(s):  
Lauren S. Hallion ◽  
Susan N. Kusmierski ◽  
M. Kathleen Caulfield

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document