scholarly journals Independent storage of real-world object features is visual rather than verbal in nature

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Platon Tikhonenko ◽  
Timothy F. Brady ◽  
Igor Utochkin

Previous work has shown that semantically meaningful properties of visually presented real-world objects, such as their color, their state/configuration of their parts/pose, or the features that differentiate them from other exemplars of the same category category, are stored with a high degree of independence in long-term memory (e.g., are frequently swapped or misbound across objects). But is this feature independence due to the visual representation of the objects, or because of verbal encoding? Semantically meaningful features can also be labeled by distinct words, which can be recombined to produce independent descriptions of real-world object features. Here, we directly test how much of the pattern of feature independence arises from visual vs. verbal encoding. In two experiments, during the study phase we orthogonally varied the match or mismatch of state (e.g., open/closed) and color information between images of objects and their verbal descriptions (Experiment 1) or between images of two exemplars from the same category (Experiment 2). At test, observers had to choose a previously presented image or description in a 4-AFC task. Whereas in Experiment 1 we found quite a small effect of visual-verbal mismatch on memory for images, the effect of mismatch between exemplars in Experiment 2 was dramatic: memory for a feature was reasonably good when it matched between exemplars, but dropped to chance otherwise. Importantly, this effect was observed both for color and object state independently. We conclude that independent, feature-based storage of objects in long-term memory is provided primarily by visual representations with possible minor influences of verbal encoding.

Heliyon ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. e05260
Author(s):  
David Bestue ◽  
Luis M. Martínez ◽  
Alex Gomez-Marin ◽  
Miguel A. Gea ◽  
Jordi Camí

2020 ◽  
Vol 149 (3) ◽  
pp. 530-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor S. Utochkin ◽  
Timothy F. Brady

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 1114
Author(s):  
Igor Utochkin ◽  
Timothy Brady

Author(s):  
Stine Vogt ◽  
Svein Magnussen

Abstract. Long-term memory for large numbers of color photographs with a common motif - doors - was studied using pictures with two levels of informative cues: original photographs, and edited pictures in which extraneous information on details such as vegetation, paint scratches, signs, and lamp posts was removed. In the study phase, subjects viewed 400 pictures and were subsequently tested for memory on two-alternative forced-choice discriminations between studied and distracter pictures from the same picture category, at retention intervals between 0.5 h and 9 days. When tested with the nonedited original photographs immediate memory performance was close to 85% correct; when pictorial details were removed memory performance dropped by 20%. The decay functions were shallow with parallel paths for the categories of pictures. It is concluded that specific details of visual scenes contributed to long-term memory of those scenes.


2003 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 757-758
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Vallar

The view that short-term memory should be conceived of as being a process based on the activation of long-term memory is inconsistent with neuropsychological evidence. Data from brain-damaged patients, showing specific patterns of impairment, are compatible with a vision of memory as a multiple-component system, whose different aspects, in neurologically unimpaired subjects, show a high degree of interaction.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Saito ◽  
Katherine Duncan ◽  
Keisuke Fukuda

Maintaining perceptual experiences in visual working memory (VWM) allows us to flexibly accomplish various tasks, but some tasks come at a price. For example, comparing VWM representations to novel perceptual inputs can induce inadvertent memory distortions. If these distortions persist, they may explain why everyday memories often become unreliable after people perform perceptual comparisons (e.g., eyewitness testimony). Here, we conducted two experiments to assess the consequences of perceptual comparisons using real-world objects that were temporarily maintained in VWM (n = 32) or recalled from long-term memory back into VWM (n = 30). In each experiment, young adults reported systematic memory distortions following perceptual comparisons. These distortions increased in magnitude with the delay between encoding and comparisons and were preserved when memories were retrieved again a day later. These findings suggest that perceptual comparisons play a mechanistic role in everyday memory distortions, including situations where memory accuracy is vital.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy F. Brady ◽  
Viola S. Störmer ◽  
George Alvarez

Visual working memory is the cognitive system that holds visual information active to make it resistant to interference from new perceptual input. Information about simple stimuli – colors, orientations – is encoded into working memory rapidly: in under 100ms, working memory ‘fills up’, revealing a stark capacity limit. However, for real-world objects, the same behavioral limits do not hold: with increasing encoding time, people store more real-world objects and do so with more detail. This boost in performance for real-world objects is generally assumed to reflect the use of a separate episodic long-term memory system, rather than working memory. Here we show that this behavioral increase in capacity with real-world objects is not solely due to the use of separate episodic long-term memory systems. In particular, we show that this increase is a result of active storage in working memory, as shown by directly measuring neural activity during the delay period of a working memory task using EEG. These data challenge fixed capacity working memory models, and demonstrate that working memory and its capacity limitations are dependent upon our existing knowledge.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Utochkin ◽  
Timothy F. Brady

People can store thousands of real-world objects in visual long-term memory with high precision. But are these objects stored as unitary, bound entities, as often assumed, or as bundles of separable features? We tested this in several experiments. In the first series of studies, participants were instructed to remember specific exemplars of real-world objects presented in a particular state (e.g., open/closed; full/empty; etc), and then were asked to recognize either which exemplars they had seen (e.g., I saw this coffee mug), or which exemplar-state conjunctions they had seen (e.g., I saw this coffee mug and it was full). Participants had a large number of within-category confusions, for example misremembering which states went with which exemplars, while simultaneously showing strong memory for the features themselves (e.g., which states they had seen; which exemplars they had seen). In a second series of studies, we found further evidence of independence: participants were very good at remembering which exemplars they had seen independently of whether these items were presented in a new or old state, but the same did not occur for features known to be truly holistically represented. Thus, we find through two lines of evidence that the features of real-world objects that support exemplar discrimination and state discrimination are not bound, suggesting visual objects are not inherently unitary entities in memory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document