Crossmodal Correspondence between Color, Shapes, and Wine Odors

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Heatherly ◽  
John P. Munafo ◽  
Melissa Foley ◽  
Curtis Luckett

Crossmodal correspondence is of scientific and commercial interest in regard to the packaging of food and beverages. Research has shown that colors and shapes can be associated with certain aromas, but these interactions have been less extensively studied with authentic visual stimuli (i.e., packaging), nor with complex odors in a food matrix. This study sought to investigate odor-color-shape crossmodal interactions with complex odor stimuli (wine odors) and wine labels. The present research uses projective mapping with 3D shapes and colors, along with a wine label matching study, to test whether chardonnay odors of different character (buttery, citrus, floral, smoky, and vegetable) are associated with certain colors and shapes. In the projective mapping experiment, most chardonnay odors were grouped similarly, however, the vegetable-forward wine was more associated with sharper shapes than rounded ones. In the wine label experiment, the yellow labels tended to be better matched with all odors, except the vegetable-forward wine, which was matched equally to all colors. These findings indicate that regardless of chardonnay odor character, it is mostly associated with a yellow colored label. Interestingly, results also indicated that not all correspondences aligned with the most common color association of an odor character (i.e., vegetative was not strictly associated with green, smoky was not associated with brown, etc.). Significant correlations between stimuli liking and matching scores indicate much of the correspondences are explained by hedonics. Overall, the present research demonstrates evidence for odor-color-shape correspondences in complex odors and realistic visual stimuli, however not as strongly as in controlled environments and simplistic stimuli.

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 457-478
Author(s):  
Louise Manfron ◽  
Valéry Legrain ◽  
Lieve Filbrich

Abstract Examining the mechanisms underlying crossmodal interaction between nociceptive and visual stimuli is crucial to understand how humans handle potential bodily threats in their environment. It has recently been shown that nociceptive stimuli can affect the perception of visual stimuli, provided that they occur close together in external space. The present study addresses the question whether these crossmodal interactions between nociceptive and visual stimuli are mediated by the visually perceived proximity between the visual stimuli and the limb on which nociceptive stimuli are applied, by manipulating the presence vs. absence of visual feedback about the position of the stimulated limb. Participants performed temporal order judgments on pairs of visual stimuli, shortly preceded by nociceptive stimuli, either applied on one hand or both hands simultaneously. The hands were placed near the visual stimuli and could either be seen directly, seen through a glass barrier, or hidden from sight with a wooden board. Unilateral nociceptive stimuli induced spatial biases to the advantage of visual stimuli presented near the stimulated hand, which were greater in the conditions in which the hands were seen than in the condition in which vision was prevented. Spatial biases were not modulated by the presence of the glass barrier, minimizing the possibility that the differential effect between the vision and no-vision conditions is solely due to the presence of the barrier between the hands and the visual stimuli. These findings highlight the importance of visual feedback for determining spatial mapping between nociceptive and visual stimuli for crossmodal interaction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 533-573
Author(s):  
Philip Sanders ◽  
Benjamin Thompson ◽  
Paul Corballis ◽  
Grant Searchfield

Abstract A scoping review was undertaken to explore research investigating early interactions and integration of auditory and visual stimuli in the human brain. The focus was on methods used to study low-level multisensory temporal processing using simple stimuli in humans, and how this research has informed our understanding of multisensory perception. The study of multisensory temporal processing probes how the relative timing between signals affects perception. Several tasks, illusions, computational models, and neuroimaging techniques were identified in the literature search. Research into early audiovisual temporal processing in special populations was also reviewed. Recent research has continued to provide support for early integration of crossmodal information. These early interactions can influence higher-level factors, and vice versa. Temporal relationships between auditory and visual stimuli influence multisensory perception, and likely play a substantial role in solving the ‘correspondence problem’ (how the brain determines which sensory signals belong together, and which should be segregated).


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 380-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Janeth Rodríguez-Roque ◽  
Begoña de Ancos ◽  
Rogelio Sánchez-Vega ◽  
Concepción Sánchez-Moreno ◽  
M. Pilar Cano ◽  
...  

Food matrix and food processing are factors of importance in designing food and beverages with a high content of bioaccessible carotenoids.


2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Mehelich ◽  
Rebecca Davis ◽  
Bethany Ingram ◽  
Courtney Wood ◽  
Rodney J. Vogl ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary C. Bayer ◽  
Rafael J. Hernandez ◽  
Andrea M. Brushfield ◽  
Caitlin E. Shea ◽  
Stephanie J. Farge

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document