scholarly journals Theoretical distinction between functional states in working memory and their corresponding neural states

Author(s):  
Mark G. Stokes ◽  
Paul S. Muhle-Karbe ◽  
Nicholas E. Myers

Working memory (WM) is important for guiding behaviour, but not always immediately. Here we define a WM item that is currently relevant for guiding behaviour as the functionally ‘active’ item; whereas items maintained in WM, but not immediately relevant to behaviour, are functionally ‘latent’. Traditional neurophysiological theories of WM proposed that content is maintained via persistent neural activity (e.g., stable attractors); however, more recent theories have highlighted the potential role for ‘activity-silent’ mechanisms (e.g., short-term synaptic plasticity). Given these somewhat parallel dichotomies, it is tempting to associate functionally active and latent cognitive states of WM with persistent- activity and activity-silent neural mechanisms, respectively. In this article we caution against a one-to-one correspondence between functional and activity states. We argue that the principal theoretical requirement for active and latent WM is that the corresponding neural states play qualitatively different functional roles. We consider a number of candidate solutions, and conclude that the neurophysiological mechanisms for functionally active and latent WM items are theoretically independent of the distinction between persistent activity vs activity-silent WM.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio De Pitta ◽  
Nicolas Brunel

Competing accounts propose that working memory (WM) is subserved either by persistent activity in single neurons, or by time-varying activity across a neural population, or by activity-silent mechanisms carried out by hidden internal states of the neural population. While WM is traditionally regarded to originate exclusively from neuronal interactions, cortical networks also include astrocytes that can modulate neural activity. We propose that different mechanisms of WM can be brought forth by astrocyte-mediated modulations of synaptic transmitter release. In this account, the emergence of different mechanisms depends on the network's spontaneous activity and the geometry of the connections between synapses and astrocytes.


Author(s):  
Jonardon Ganeri

Increasingly it is recognized that selection is not the only function of attention; rather, ‘attention gates what comes to be encoded into short-term memory, helps maintain information in short-term memory, and dynamically modulates the information being maintained’ (Nobre and Kastner 2014: 1215; my italics). Recent empirical literature affirms the existence of early and late selective attention as distinct attentional phenomena but points to a dissociation between selective attention of either sort and maintenance of information in working memory. This chapter will demonstrate that the Buddhist concept of javana ‘running’ is a concept of working memory and that all the processes in Buddhaghosa’s pathway to consciousness are associated with functional roles that are actually realized by recognized entities in psychology and neuroscience.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pritish {ato; ◽  
mikhail katkov ◽  
Ofer Yizhar ◽  
Misha Tsodyks

Working memory is an essential human trait required for all cognitive activities. Our previous model from \citet{mongillo_2008,mi_2017} uses synaptic facilitation to store traces of working memory. Thus memories can be maintained without persistent neural activity. A critical component of this model is a central inhibition which prevents multiple item representations from being active at the same time. We know from experimental studies that multiple genetically-defined interneuron subtypes (e.g. PV, SOM) with different excitability and connectivity properties mediate inhibition in the cortex. The role of these subtypes in working memory however is not known. Here we develop a modified model with these interneuron subtypes, and propose their functional roles in working memory. We make concrete testable predictions about the roles of these groups.


2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 1049-1054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne E. Mackey ◽  
Orrin Devinsky ◽  
Werner K. Doyle ◽  
John G. Golfinos ◽  
Clayton E. Curtis

The neural mechanisms that support working memory (WM) depend on persistent neural activity. Within topographically organized maps of space in dorsal parietal cortex, spatially selective neural activity persists during WM for location. However, to date, the necessity of these topographic subregions of human parietal cortex for WM remains unknown. To test the causal relationship of these areas to WM, we compared the performance of patients with lesions to topographically organized parietal cortex with those of controls on a memory-guided saccade (MGS) task as well as a visually guided saccade (VGS) task. The MGS task allowed us to measure WM precision continuously with great sensitivity, whereas the VGS task allowed us to control for any deficits in general spatial or visuomotor processing. Compared with controls, patients generated memory-guided saccades that were significantly slower and less accurate, whereas visually guided saccades were unaffected. These results provide key missing evidence for the causal role of topographic areas in human parietal cortex for WM, as well as the neural mechanisms supporting WM.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clayton E Curtis ◽  
Thomas C Sprague

Working memory (WM) extends the duration over which information is available for processing. Given its importance in supporting a wide-array of high level cognitive abilities, uncovering the neural mechanisms that underlie WM has been a primary goal of neuroscience research over the past century. Here, we critically review what we consider the two major arcs of inquiry, with a specific focus on findings that were theoretically transformative. For the first arc, we briefly review classic studies that led to the canonical WM theory that cast the prefrontal cortex (PFC) as a central player utilizing persistent activity of neurons as a mechanism for memory storage. We then consider recent challenges to the theory regarding the role of persistent neural activity. The second arc, which evolved over the last decade, stemmed from sophisticated computational neuroimaging approaches enabling researchers to decode the contents of WM from the patterns of neural activity in many parts of the brain including early visual cortex. We summarize key findings from these studies, their implications for WM theory, and finally the challenges these findings pose. A comprehensive theory of WM will require a unification of these two arcs of research.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clayton E. Curtis ◽  
Thomas C. Sprague

Working memory (WM) extends the duration over which information is available for processing. Given its importance in supporting a wide-array of high level cognitive abilities, uncovering the neural mechanisms that underlie WM has been a primary goal of neuroscience research over the past century. Here, we critically review what we consider the two major “arcs” of inquiry, with a specific focus on findings that were theoretically transformative. For the first arc, we briefly review classic studies that led to the canonical WM theory that cast the prefrontal cortex (PFC) as a central player utilizing persistent activity of neurons as a mechanism for memory storage. We then consider recent challenges to the theory regarding the role of persistent neural activity. The second arc, which evolved over the last decade, stemmed from sophisticated computational neuroimaging approaches enabling researchers to decode the contents of WM from the patterns of neural activity in many parts of the brain including early visual cortex. We summarize key findings from these studies, their implications for WM theory, and finally the challenges these findings pose. Our goal in doing so is to identify barriers to developing a comprehensive theory of WM that will require a unification of these two “arcs” of research.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Hass ◽  
Salva Ardid ◽  
Jason Sherfey ◽  
Nancy Kopell

AbstractPersistent activity, the maintenance of neural activation over short periods of time in cortical networks, is widely thought to underlie the cognitive function of working memory. A large body of modeling studies has reproduced this kind of activity using cell assemblies with strengthened synaptic connections. However, almost all of these studies have considered persistent activity within networks with homogeneous neurons and synapses, making it difficult to judge the validity of such model results for cortical dynamics, which is based on highly heterogeneous neurons. Here, we consider persistent activity in a detailed, strongly data-driven network model of the prefrontal cortex with heterogeneous neuron and synapse parameters. Surprisingly, persistent activity could not be reproduced in this model without incorporating further constraints. We identified three factors that prevent successful persistent activity: heterogeneity in the cell parameters of interneurons, heterogeneity in the parameters of short-term synaptic plasticity and heterogeneity in the synaptic weights. Our model predicts that persistent activity is recovered if the heterogeneity in the activity of individual interneurons is diminished, which could be achieved by a homeostatic plasticity mechanism. Such a plasticity scheme could also compensate the heterogeneities in the synaptic weights and short-term plasticity when applied to the inhibitory synapses. Cell assemblies shaped in this way may be potentially targeted by distinct inputs or become more responsive to specific tuning or spectral properties. Furthermore, the model predicts that a network that exhibits persistent activity is not able to dynamically produce intrinsic in vivo-like irregular activity at the same time, because heterogeneous synaptic connections are required for these dynamics. Thus, the background noise in such a network must either be produced by external input or constitutes an entirely different state of the network, which is brought about, e.g., by neuromodulation.Author summaryTo operate effectively in a constantly changing world, it is crucial to keep relevant information in mind for short periods of time. This ability, called working memory, is commonly assumed to rest on reverberating activity among members of cell assemblies. While effective in reproducing key results of working memory, most cell assembly models rest on major simplifications such as using the same parameters for all neurons and synapses, i.e., assuming homogeneity in these parameters. Here, we show that this homogeneity assumption is necessary for persistent activity to arise, specifically for inhibitory interneurons and synapses. Using a strongly data-driven network model of the prefrontal cortex, we show that the heterogeneities in the above parameters that are implied by in vitro studies prevent persistent activity. When homogeneity is imposed on inhibitory neurons and synapses, persistent activity is recovered. We propose that the homogeneity constraints can be implemented in the brain by means of homeostatic plasticity, a form of learning that keeps the activity of a network in a constant, homeostatic state. The model makes a number of predictions for biological networks, including a structural separation of networks responsible for generating persistent activity and spontaneous, noise-like activity.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Stein ◽  
J. Barbosa ◽  
M. Rosa-Justicia ◽  
L. Prades ◽  
A. Morató ◽  
...  

AbstractWe report markedly reduced working memory-related serial dependence with preserved memory accuracy in anti-NMDAR encephalitis and schizophrenia. We argue that NMDAR-related changes in cortical excitation, while quickly destabilizing persistent neural activity, cannot fully account for a reduction of memory-dependent biases. Rather, our modeling results support a disruption of a memory mechanism operating on a longer timescale, such as short-term potentiation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document