scholarly journals Congruency effects on recognition memory: A context effect

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara M Rosner ◽  
Bruce Milliken

Two recent studies have reported that incongruent selective attention items are better remembered than congruent items on a surprise recognition memory test (Krebs, Boehler, De Belder, & Egner, 2013; Rosner, D’Angelo, MacLellan, & Milliken, 2014). These findings suggest that an increased need for cognitive control may trigger encoding mechanisms at the time of study that result in better recognition of those items at test, a form of the desirable difficulty effect (Bjork, 1994). The experiments in the present paper demonstrate that this effect can depend on whether differences in selective attention difficulty are blocked or intermixed at the time of encoding. These results suggest that additional encoding time itself does not invariably result in better recognition for more difficult selective attention items. Instead, the dependence of recognition memory on encoding difficulty appears to reflect a context-sensitive control response to encoding difficulty.

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 1391-1399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Smirni ◽  
Pietro Smirni ◽  
Giovanni Di Martino ◽  
Lisa Cipolotti ◽  
Massimiliano Oliveri ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 86 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1320-1322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron C. Malina ◽  
Dana A. Bowers ◽  
Scott R. Millis ◽  
Sara Uekert

The Recognition Memory Test is frequently used to assess memory; however, one of the commonly cited limitations is a lack of data on reliability. The current study was undertaken to estimate the internal consistency reliability of the test with a sample of 72 persons with traumatic brain injury. Acceptable estimates of internal consistency for both subtests were obtained.


Assessment ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant L. Iverson ◽  
Michael D. Franzen

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the efficacy of using the Recognition Memory Test (RMT), Digit Span subtest (WAIS-R), and Knox Cube Test as markers for malingered memory deficits. Participants were 100 subjects from three general populations: university students, federal inmates, and patients with head injuries. Twenty students, 20 inmates, and 20 patients with head injuries resulting in memory impairment were instructed to try their best on the assessment procedures. The remaining 20 students and 20 inmates were instructed to malinger memory impairment on the procedures. The experimental-malingerers (i.e., students and inmates) performed more poorly than the patients with head injuries on nearly every score derived from the three tests. Discriminant function analyses using the age-corrected Digit Span scale score, the Knox Cube Test total score, and the RMT raw scores for words and faces as predictors of group membership resulted in an overall 98% correct classification rate and 100% correct on cross-validation. Simultaneously applying two empirically-derived RMT cutoff scores resulted in an overall correct classification rate of 100%. The extraordinarily high classification rates in this study were likely influenced by the experimental design and procedures.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Feil ◽  
Jose Mestre ◽  
Leon Hsu ◽  
Charles Henderson ◽  
Laura McCullough

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document