scholarly journals Penggunaan Mikro Irradiasi Sinar Gamma untuk Meningkatkan Keragaman Genetik pada Varietas Kedelai Argomulyo [Glycine max (L) Merr]

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Diana Sofia Hanafiah ◽  
Trikoesoemaningtyas Trikoesoemaningtyas ◽  
Sudirman Yahya ◽  
Desta Wirnas

This research used gamma ray irradiation on low doses (micro mutation). The aim of this research was to know the respons of doses level bymicro mutation on gamma ray irridation to the growing and development of Argomulyo variety of Glycine max (L) Merr (M1), the seeds isirradiated by gamma ray by micro mutation was 0 Gy, 50 Gy, 100 Gy, 150 Gy, and 200 Gy. Variation that obtained of each characters atgeneration M1 and M2 influences plants growth and development either through qualitative and quantitative that finally will influence plantsproduction. The average highest genetic variation at M 2 generation of soybean was on 200 Gy doses. Results of the research indicated thatgamma ray irradiation on 200 Gy doses was effective caused of plant variation genetic.

1996 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Takahashi ◽  
Yukiko Mizuno ◽  
Setsuzo Yumoto ◽  
Keisuke Kitamura ◽  
Shigeki Nakamura

Genetics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
E J Roth ◽  
B L Frazier ◽  
N R Apuya ◽  
K G Lark

Abstract Although soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] grows as an inbreeding, generally homozygous, plant, the germplasm of the species contains large amounts of genetic variation. Analysis of soybean DNA has indicated that variation of RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) markers within the species usually entails only two alleles at any one locus and that mixtures of such dimorphic loci account for virtually all of the restriction fragment variation seen in soybean (G. max), and in its ancestors, G. soja and G. gracilis. We report here that tissue cultures prepared from root tissue of individual soybean plants develop RFLP allelic differences at various loci. However, these newly generated alleles are almost always the same as ones previously found and characterized in other varieties of cultivated soybean (cultivars). This repeated generation of particular alleles suggests that much of the genetic variation seen in soybean could be the consequence of specific, relatively frequently employed, recombinational events. Such a mechanism would allow inbred cultivars to generate genetic variation (in the form of alternative alleles) in a controlled manner, perhaps in response to stress.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 2439-2450
Author(s):  
Bing-xiao WEN ◽  
Sajad HUSSAIN ◽  
Jia-yue YANG ◽  
Shan WANG ◽  
Yi ZHANG ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Lutfy Ditya Cahyanti

<p><em>Weeds are an important factor in the decline of soybean  production. One of weed control techniques that can be done is to use alelopati as an bioherbicide. One source of allelopathy that can be utilized as bioherbicide is bamboo leaf litter. Problems arise if this alelopati also affect the pattern of germination cultivation plants because one of the main requirements of bioherbisida is not to affect the growth and development of crops. The purpose of this study was to determine whether leaf litter alelopathy would affect the germination of soybeans. The hypothesis this research is that bamboo leaf litter alelopathy will not affect the germination of soybean crops so it will be safe to use as a pre-plant bioherbicide. The treated treatment is without litter solution of bamboo leaf, and dosage of 5%, 10%, and 15% bamboo leaf litter solution. The design used was a complete non factorial randomized design with 5x replication. The conclusion of this research is the treatment of allelopathy given by application of bamboo leaf litter with various doses has no significant effect on the germination, sprout length, and germination time of soybean crop, so that bamboo leaf litter solution is safe to be used as bioherbicide on sustainable agriculture.</em></p>


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Bryan Heinemann ◽  
Aline de H.N. Maia ◽  
Durval Dourado-Neto ◽  
K.T. Ingram ◽  
Gerrit Hoogenboom

1975 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 745-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Quebedeaux ◽  
Raymond Chollet

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document