scholarly journals Macular and Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Thickness in Unilateral Amblyopic Eye

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-138
Author(s):  
Chunu Shrestha ◽  
Reeta Rajbhandari ◽  
Manish Poudel
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Fiber ◽  
Anterior Segment ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Fiber Layer ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Fellow Eye ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fiber Thickness ◽  
Fellow Eyes ◽  
Retinal Nerve Fiber

Amblyopia is the most common cause of monocular visual impairment in both children, and young to middle-aged adults, affecting 2%–5% of the general population. The objective of this study was to compare the peripapillary nerve fiber thickness and macular thickness in amblyopic eyes, fellow eyes and normal control eyes using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. This was a cross-sectional observational study conducted at R M Kedia Eye Hospital, Birgunj, Nepal from February 2020 to July 2020. Pediatric patients with unilateral amblyopia (anisometropic amblyopia, strabismic amblyopia or both) among the age group of 6-18 years attending pediatric department of RM Kedia Eye Hospital were enrolled for the study. All patients underwent a full ophthalmological assessment, including visual-acuity testing, anterior segment evaluation with Topcon slit lamp and fundus examination with Volk +90D lenses. All statistical analysis was done in SPSS V. 20. The average peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness was 120.6 μm (SD=14.6 μm) in the amblyopic eye, 118.1 μm (SD=15.6 μm) in the fellow eye and 113.2 μm (SD=9.4 μm) in the normal eye (p=0.104) respectively. The average macular thickness was 298.6 μm (SD=19.1 μm) in the amblyopic eye, 296.9 μm (SD=11.2 μm) in the fellow eye and 303 μm (SD=12.4 μm) in the normal eye (p=0.260) respectively. In conclusion, our study did not find any significant difference in the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber thickness or macular thickness when compared between amblyopic eyes, fellow eyes, gender and age matched normal eyes.

scholarly journals Effect of intravitreal ranibizumab and aflibercept injections on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayoung Ahn ◽  
Kyuhwan Jang ◽  
Joonhong Sohn ◽  
Ji In Park ◽  
Daniel Duck-Jin Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Fiber ◽  
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Fiber Layer ◽  
Exudative Amd ◽  
Nerve Fiber Layer ◽  
Rnfl Thickness ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fellow Eyes ◽  
Retinal Nerve Fiber

AbstractThe purpose is to evaluate the effects of multiple intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and aflibercept (IVA) injections on peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This retrospective, observational, consecutive case series study enrolled patients newly diagnosed with monocular exudative AMD from January 2014 to October 2019 who were administered IVR or IVA injections. Normal fellow eyes were included as controls. Medical records and spectral domain optical coherence tomography results were reviewed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after injection. No statistically significant differences in peripapillary RNFL thickness and intraocular pressure were observed between the treated and fellow eyes in the two groups. The global RNFL thicknesses for the treated eyes decreased significantly after 12 months compared with baseline, but no significant difference was observed in any of the six examined sectors (temporal, superior temporal, superior nasal, nasal, inferior nasal, and inferior temporal). At 12 months, the central macular thickness of the treated eyes decreased significantly. Multiple IVR and IVA injections are apparently safe considering peripapillary RNFL damage in patients with exudative AMD. The decreased RNFL thickness of the global sector was presumably due to anatomical improvement of macular lesions.

scholarly journals Effects of Misalignments in the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements with Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kleyton A. Barella ◽  
Fernanda Cremasco ◽  
Camila Zangalli ◽  
Vital P. Costa
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Fiber ◽  
Layer Thickness ◽  
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer ◽  
Fiber Layer ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Nerve Fiber Layer ◽  
Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sd Oct ◽  
Retinal Nerve Fiber

Purpose. To investigate misalignments (MAs) on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) measurements obtained withCirrus©SD-OCT.Methods. This was a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study. Twenty-seven healthy and 29 glaucomatous eyes of 56 individuals with one normal exam and another showing MA were included. MAs were defined as an improper alignment of vertical vessels in the en face image. MAs were classified in complete MA (CMA) and partial MA (PMA), according to their site: 1 (superior, outside the measurement ring (MR)), 2 (superior, within MR), 3 (inferior, within MR), and 4 (inferior, outside MR). We compared RNFLT measurements of aligned versus misaligned exams in all 4 sectors, in the superior area (sectors 1 + 2), inferior area (sectors 3 + 4), and within the measurement ring (sectors 2 + 3).Results. RNFLT measurements at 12 clock-hour of eyes with MAs in the superior area (sectors 1 + 2) were significantly lower than those obtained in the same eyes without MAsP=0.043. No significant difference was found in other areas (sectors 1 + 2 + 3 + 4, sectors 3 + 4, and sectors 2 + 3).Conclusion. SD-OCT scans with superior MAs may present lower superior RNFLT measurements compared to aligned exams.

Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness between Normal Eyes & Glaucoma

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basimah S Al-Otaibi
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Fiber ◽  
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer ◽  
Thickness Measurement ◽  
Fiber Layer ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Nerve Fiber Layer ◽  
Early Stages ◽  
Rnfl Thickness ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Retinal Nerve Fiber

Background: Screening of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) is valuable in the early stages of glaucoma, because RNFL changes may precede functional loss. Aim to study: The purpose of this study was to assess the RNFL thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Difference in the RNFL thickness was also determined between the groups.Methods: Sixty healthy subjects and 30 subjects with glaucoma participated in this cross-sectional study. Healthy volunteers free of glaucoma were divided into 2 groups, younger (age ≤ 35 years) and older (age > 35 years) participants. All subjects underwent complete ophthalmic evaluation, including visual acuity, refraction, slit-lamp, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, and RNFL thickness measurement by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Unpaired t-test was performed to compare RNFL thickness between the eyes of younger and older participants. One way analysis (ANOVA) test was employed to compare RNFL thickness among the 3 groups (normal young, normal old & glaucomatous eyes).Results: Mean values of RNFL thickness in the younger, older and glaucoma populations were 109.3±15 µm (95% CI 103.7-114.06 µm), 106.8 ± 14 µm (95% CI 101.49-112.02) and 92.8± 29 µm (95% CI 82.11-103.47), respectively. There was a significant difference among the 3 groups (p=0.0045). The RNFL was thinner in older participants than younger participants (p=0.0067). Conclusions: Screening of the RNFL is valuable in the early stages of glaucoma.

An Evaluation of the Relationship between Retinal Nerve Fiber Thickness, Cochlear Nerve Thickness, the Level of Tinnitus, and Hearing Loss in Unilateral Tinnitus Patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Mustafa Avcu ◽  
Mehmet Metin ◽  
Raşit Kılıç ◽  
Muhammed Alpaslan
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Nerve Fiber ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Cochlear Nerve ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Fiber Thickness ◽  
Moderate Hearing Loss ◽  
Group 1 ◽  
Retinal Nerve Fiber

Background: In this study, optic coherence tomography (OCT) examination was performed to check whether there was any interaction between ophthalmic axonal structures in unilateral tinnitus patients, and the relationship between optic nerve thickness and cochlear nerve thickness was evaluated. Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the relatioship between hearing loss, tinnitus, and nerve thicknesses. Study Design: Prospective study. Setting: Tertiary referral university hospital. Patients: The study included 88 patients with unilateral tinnitus, for which no organic cause could be found in physical examination, psychiatric evaluation, or with imaging methods. Study groups were formed of the tinnitus side and control groups were formed of the healthy side as follows: Group 1 (Non-tinnitus side normal hearing values – n = 30), Group 2 (non-tinnitus side minimal hearing loss – n = 27), Group 3 (non-tinnitus side moderate hearing loss – n = 31), Group 4 (tinnitus side normal hearing values – n = 25), Group 5 (tinnitus side minimal hearing loss – n = 25), and Group 6 (tinnitus side moderate hearing loss – n = 38). Intervention: Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was evaluated with OCT, and the cochlear nerve cross-sectional area was evaluated with MRI. Main Outcome Measures: RNFL measurements were taken with OCT from the subfoveal area (RNFL-SF) and 1.5 mm temporal to the fovea (RNFL-T µm) and nasal (RNFL-N µm) sectors. On MRI, 3 measurements were taken along the nerve from the cerebellopontine angle as far as the internal auditory canal, and the mean value of these 3 measurements was calculated. Results: When the groups were evaluated in respect of cochlear nerve thickness, a significant difference was seen between Group 1 and both the groups with hearing loss and the tinnitus groups. In the subgroup analysis, a statistically significant difference was determined between Group 1 and Groups 3, 4, 5, and 6 (p = 0.013, p = 0.003, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). When the groups were evaluated in respect of the RNFL-SF (µm), RNFL-T (µm), and RNFL-N (µm) values, the differences were determined to be statistically significant (p < 0.001 for all). In the correlation analysis, a negative correlation was determined between hearing loss and cochlear nerve diameter (r: −0.184, p = 0.014), and RNFL-N (r: −0.272, p < 0.001) and between tinnitus and cochlear nerve diameter (r: −0.536, p < 0.001), and RNFL-T (r: −0.222, p < 0.009). Conclusion: The study results clearly showed a relationship between cochlear nerve fiber thickness and hearing loss and the severity of tinnitus in cases with unilateral tinnitus and that there could be neurodegenerative factors in the disease etiology. A similar relationship seen with the RNFL supports the study hypothesis.

scholarly journals Factors related to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in bipolar disorder patients and major depression patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanhong Liu ◽  
Yongsheng Tong ◽  
Lvzhen Huang ◽  
Jingxu Chen ◽  
Shaoxiao Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Disorder ◽  
Major Depression ◽  
Nerve Fiber ◽  
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Fiber Layer ◽  
Nerve Fiber Layer ◽  
Rnfl Thickness ◽  
Normal People ◽  
Retinal Nerve Fiber

Abstract Background We analyzed the correlation of the clinical data with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and macular thickness in bipolar disorder patients and major depression patients. The aim of this study is to explore factors that affect RNFL thickness in bipolar disorder patients and major depression patients, with a view to providing a new diagnostic strategy. Methods Eighty-two bipolar disorder patients, 35 major depression patients and 274 people who were age and gender matched with the patients were enrolled. Demographic information and metabolic profile of all participants were collected. Best-corrected visual acuity of each eye, intraocular pressure (IOP), fundus examination was performed. RNFL and macular thickness were measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Correlations between RNFL and macular thickness and other data were analyzed. Results RNFL and macula lutea in bipolar dipolar patients and major depression patients are thinner than normal people. Triglyceride and UA levels are the highest in the bipolar disorder group, while alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and glutamic oxalacetic transaminase (AST) levels in the depression group are the highest. Age onset and ALT are positively while uric acid (UA) is negatively correlated with RNFL thickness in bipolar dipolar patients. Cholesterol level is positively correlated with RNFL thickness while the duration of illness is correlated with RNFL thickness of left eye in major depression patients. Conclusions RNFL and macula lutea in bipolar dipolar patients and major depression patients are thinner than normal people. In bipolar disorder patients, age-onset and ALT are potential protective factors in the progress of RNFL thinning, while UA is the pathological factor.

scholarly journals DETERMINATION OF FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PERIPAPILLARY RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER AND MACULAR THICKNESS USING OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 448-457
Author(s):  
Hadi Ostadimoghaddam ◽  
Neda Nakhjavanpour ◽  
Abolfazl Payandeh ◽  
Mohammad-Reza Mohammad-Reza Sedaghat ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Coherence Tomography ◽  
Nerve Fiber ◽  
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Optical Coherence ◽  
Fiber Layer ◽  
Nerve Fiber Layer ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Retinal Nerve Fiber

scholarly journals Macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber thickness analysis ın ocular dominance

2018 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Selim Cevher ◽  
Yusuf Kocluk ◽  
Savas Cetinkaya ◽  
Emine Alyamac Sukgen
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Fiber ◽  
Ocular Dominance ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Fiber Thickness ◽  
Retinal Nerve Fiber

scholarly journals Age-Related Physiologic Thinning Rate of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer in Different Levels of Myopia

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Daun Jeong ◽  
Kyung Rim Sung ◽  
Youn Hye Jo ◽  
Sung-cheol Yun
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Fiber ◽  
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer ◽  
Refractive Error ◽  
Fiber Layer ◽  
Nerve Fiber Layer ◽  
Rnfl Thickness ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Thinning Rate ◽  
Sd Oct ◽  
Retinal Nerve Fiber

Purpose. To investigate the effect of refractive error on the physiologic thinning rate of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) in healthy eyes. Materials and Methods. This study analyzed 223 eyes of 141 healthy subjects followed for more than 5 years and underwent at least five serial spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) examinations. Longitudinal RNFL measurements were analyzed by linear mixed models incorporating follow-up duration, baseline RNFL thickness, spherical equivalent (SE), age, intraocular pressure, and visual field mean deviation. Thinning rates were classified according to SE into three groups: nonmyopic (NM; >0 D), mild-to-moderately myopic (MM; >–6 D and ≤0 D), and highly myopic (HM; ≤–6 D). Results. The overall slopes of change in RNFL thickness over time in the NM, MM, and HM groups were −0.305 ± 0.128, −0.294 ± 0.068, and −0.208 ± 0.097 μm/yr, respectively. Slopes of RNFL thickness changes in these groups were −0.514 ± 0.248, −0.520 ± 0.133, and −0.528 ± 0.188 μm/yr, in the superior quadrant; −0.084 ± 0.145, 0.107 ± 0.082, and −0.161 ± 0.112 μm/yr, in the temporal quadrant; −0.807 ± 0.242, −0.794 ± 0.130, and −0.727 ± 0.183 μm/yr, in the inferior quadrant; and 0.160 ± 0.157, 0.118 ± 0.084, and 0.429 ± 0.119 μm/yr, in the nasal quadrant. Overall and in all four quadrants, there was no significant difference in the rate of RNFL thickness change among the three groups. Conclusions. Refractive error did not affect the physiologic thinning rate of RNFL when assessed by SD OCT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document