Misunderstandings of atmospheric carbon budgets: Advances toward remediation of a common student misconception

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Collin Peter Reichert
2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 460-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Collin Reichert ◽  
Cinzia Cervato ◽  
Michael Larsen ◽  
Dale Niederhauser

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Collin Reichert ◽  
Cinzia Cervato ◽  
Dale Niederhauser ◽  
Michael D. Larsen

Author(s):  
Philippe Ciais ◽  
Yitong Yao ◽  
Thomas Gasser ◽  
Alessandro Baccini ◽  
Yilong Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Resolving regional carbon budgets is critical for informing land-based mitigation policy. For nine regions covering nearly the whole globe, we collected inventory estimates of carbon-stock changes complemented by satellite estimates of biomass changes where inventory data are missing. The net land–atmospheric carbon exchange (NEE) was calculated by taking the sum of the carbon-stock change and lateral carbon fluxes from crop and wood trade, and riverine-carbon export to the ocean. Summing up NEE from all regions, we obtained a global ‘bottom-up’ NEE for net land anthropogenic CO2 uptake of –2.2 ± 0.6 PgC yr−1 consistent with the independent top-down NEE from the global atmospheric carbon budget during 2000–09. This estimate is so far the most comprehensive global bottom-up carbon budget accounting, which set up an important milestone for global carbon-cycle studies. By decomposing NEE into component fluxes, we found that global soil heterotrophic respiration amounts to a source of CO2 of 39 PgC yr−1 with an interquartile of 33–46 PgC yr−1—a much smaller portion of net primary productivity than previously reported.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document