scholarly journals ON THE DECISIONMAKING IN PROCESS OF PARTICIPATORY PLANNING : Practice story from public cultural facility projects

2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (552) ◽  
pp. 117-124
Author(s):  
Yuan LONG ◽  
Hiroyuki SHIMIZU ◽  
Atsushi OTSUKI ◽  
Takayuki SUGIMOTO
Spatium ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasa Colic ◽  
Omiljena Dzelebdzic

Participation has been present in the Serbian legal framework in the domain of urban planning since the 1950s. Its scope and legal definition have evolved with the transition to democracy, markets and decentralised governance. In line with EU standards, Serbia introduced an additional level of participation in the form of early public inquiry in 2014. Still, participatory planning practice is often seen as a formality which lacks sufficient effect on the planning solution, and requires qualitative improvements in citizen and stakeholder involvement. The main aim of this paper is to suggest that the use of alternative methods of participation in the domains of informing, consultation and active participation may increase the effectiveness of participatory planning practice. Thus, this paper points out some examples of good practice, and argues for the importance of recognising the existing base of knowledge and expertise in order to respond to contemporary requirements in the field of urban planning.


2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aulia Akbar ◽  
Johannes Flacke ◽  
Javier Martinez ◽  
Martin F. A. M. van Maarseveen

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
GAVIN PARKER ◽  
EMMA STREET

2021 ◽  
pp. 095624782110193
Author(s):  
Vanesa Castán Broto

All over the world, people suffer violence and discrimination because of their sexual orientation and gender identity. Queer theory has linked the politics of identity and sexuality with radical democracy experiments to decolonize development. Queering participatory planning can improve the wellbeing of vulnerable sectors of the population, while also enhancing their political representation and participation. However, to date, there has been limited engagement with the politics of sexuality and identity in participatory planning. This paper identifies three barriers that prevent the integration of queer concerns. First, queer issues are approached as isolated and distinct, separated from general matters for discussion in participatory processes. Second, heteronormative assumptions have shaped two fields that inform participatory planning practices: development studies and urban planning. Third, concrete, practical problems (from safety concerns to developing shared vocabularies) make it difficult to raise questions of identity and sexuality in public discussions. An engagement with queer thought has potential to renew participatory planning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document