Volunteers’ Motivation, Satisfaction, and Intention to Volunteer in the Future: The London 2012 Olympic Games

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 431-454
Author(s):  
Sung-Bum Kim ◽  
Alexander Amanda ◽  
Dae-Young Kim
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Slater ◽  
Jamie B. Barker ◽  
Pete Coffee ◽  
Marc V. Jones

2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffery Z Kohe

Engendering interest and support among young people was a key strategy for the organisers of the London 2012 Olympic Games. Part of the approach entailed promoting the event as a context and inspirational catalyst to propel young people’s proclivities toward, and enduring participation in, sport and physical activity. Although a variety of participatory platforms were entertained, the discipline of physical education remained a favoured space in which enduring Olympic imperatives could be amalgamated with government policy objectives. In this paper data are presented taken from the initial three years of a longitudinal study on young people’s engagement with the London 2012 Olympic Games, sport, physical activity and physical education within the UK’s West Midlands region. Memory scholarship is brought together with Olympic critiques, legacy debates, youth work and discussions about physical education to conceptualise participants’ anticipations and recollections of the London 2012 Olympic Games as a triptych of narrative fragments: each provides insights regarding youth experiences and the remnants of Olympic ether in the country’s hinterland. The paper offers a means subsequently to think differently about how we might play with the qualitative sociological/historiographical moments (experiences, voices, accounts, stories, etc.) that we capture in and through our work.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Schnitzer ◽  
Lukas Haizinger

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) lacks candidates willing to host the Olympic Games (OG) and has reacted to this situation by introducing the Olympic Agenda 2020 (OA)—a reform process making the OG more attractive for potential hosts. This study analyzes whether the OA plays a crucial role for the future of the OG. We, therefore, examined the official IOC documents and feasibility studies of the 2026 Winter Olympic Games (WOG) bidders and conducted qualitative interviews with experts in the field (n = 15). The results reveal that the 2026 WOG hosts plan to reduce the budgets for the organization and the infrastructure costs in the host regions. As a consequence, the number and nature of the sites and venues as well as the distances between them will increase. This means that the future Olympic heritage (OH) may lay less in iconic buildings but rather focus on the attempt to fulfil the city’s long-term strategies. Our analyses extend the literature by: (1) analysing the OA in view of future OG, (2) comparing experiences from past OG with those of current bidders, (3) integrating expert knowledge thanks to qualitative interviews and, finally, (4) considering new heritage concepts.


2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Elaine Grant ◽  
Kathrin Steffen ◽  
Philip Glasgow ◽  
Nicola Phillips ◽  
Lynn Booth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document