scholarly journals Event-Related Potential and Visual Evoked Potential in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

1993 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 363-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masanaka Takeda ◽  
Hisahiro Tachibana ◽  
Bungo Okuda ◽  
Keita Kawabata ◽  
Minoru Sugita
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Visual Evoked

Effect of L-dopa on visual evoked potential in patients with Parkinson's disease

Neurology ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 1119-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Bhaskar ◽  
S. Vanchilingam ◽  
E. A. Bhaskar ◽  
A. Devaprabhu ◽  
R. A. Ganesan
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Visual Evoked

scholarly journals Meta-Analysis of Visual Evoked Potential and Parkinson’s Disease

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Song-bin He ◽  
Chun-yan Liu ◽  
Lin-di Chen ◽  
Zhi-nan Ye ◽  
Ya-ping Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
P100 Latency ◽  
Visual Evoked

Background. Previous studies suggested that visual evoked potential (VEP) was impaired in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), but the results were inconsistent. Methods. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore whether the VEP was significantly different between PD patients and healthy controls. Case-control studies of PD were selected through an electronic search of the databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We calculated the pooled weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between individuals with PD and controls using the random-effects model. Results. Twenty case-control studies which met our inclusion criteria were included in the final meta-analysis. We found that the P100 latency in PD was significantly higher compared with healthy controls (pooled WMD = 6.04, 95% CI: 2.73 to 9.35, P=0.0003, n=20). However, the difference in the mean amplitude of P100 was not significant between the two groups (pooled WMD = 0.64, 95% CI: −0.06 to 1.33, P=0.07) based on 10 studies with the P100 amplitude values available. Conclusions. The higher P100 latency of VEP was observed in PD patients, relative to healthy controls. Our findings suggest that electrophysiological changes and functional defect in the visual pathway of PD patients are important to our understanding of the pathophysiology of visual involvement in PD.

scholarly journals Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential Classification Using Complex Valued Convolutional Neural Networks

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (16) ◽  
pp. 5309
Author(s):  
Akira Ikeda ◽  
Yoshikazu Washizawa
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Information Transfer ◽  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Stimulation Frequency ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Spectrum Estimation ◽  
Complex Valued ◽  
Visual Evoked

The steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), which is a kind of event-related potential in electroencephalograms (EEGs), has been applied to brain–computer interfaces (BCIs). SSVEP-based BCIs currently perform the best in terms of information transfer rate (ITR) among various BCI implementation methods. Canonical component analysis (CCA) or spectrum estimation, such as the Fourier transform, and their extensions have been used to extract features of SSVEPs. However, these signal extraction methods have a limitation in the available stimulation frequency; thus, the number of commands is limited. In this paper, we propose a complex valued convolutional neural network (CVCNN) to overcome the limitation of SSVEP-based BCIs. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method overcomes the limitation of the stimulation frequency, and it outperforms conventional SSVEP feature extraction methods.

Olfactory Modulation of Steady- State Visual Evoked Potential Topography in Comparison with Differences in Odor Sensitivity

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline M. Owen ◽  
John Patterson ◽  
Richard B. Silberstein
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Behavioral Responses ◽  
Simultaneous Recording ◽  
Odor Concentration ◽  
Odor Detection ◽  
Detection Response ◽  
Response Groups ◽  
Visual Evoked

Summary Research was undertaken to determine whether olfactory stimulation can alter steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) topography. Odor-air and air-only stimuli were used to determine whether the SSVEP would be altered when odor was present. Comparisons were also made of the topographic activation associated with air and odor stimulation, with the view toward determining whether the revealed topographic activity would differentiate levels of olfactory sensitivity by clearly identifying supra- and subthreshold odor responses. Using a continuous respiration olfactometer (CRO) to precisely deliver an odor or air stimulus synchronously with the natural respiration, air or odor (n-butanol) was randomly delivered into the inspiratory airstream during the simultaneous recording of SSVEPs and subjective behavioral responses. Subjects were placed in groups based on subjective odor detection response: “yes” and “no” detection groups. In comparison to air, SSVEP topography revealed cortical changes in response to odor stimulation for both response groups, with topographic changes evident for those unable to perceive the odor, showing the presence of a subconscious physiological odor detection response. Differences in regional SSVEP topography were shown for those who reported smelling the odor compared with those who remained unaware of the odor. These changes revealed olfactory modulation of SSVEP topography related to odor awareness and sensitivity and therefore odor concentration relative to thresholds.

Visual Evoked potential signal processing and analysis for normal and galucomic eyes

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 2106-2121
Author(s):  
Hamed Ibrahem Abdelkader ◽  
Mona Abdelkader ◽  
Mohammed Kabeel ◽  
Malak Alya
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Optic Tract ◽  
Pattern Reversal ◽  
Blue Color ◽  
Check Size ◽  
Retinal Stimulation ◽  
Normal Individuals ◽  
Visual Evoked

Visual evoked potentials (VEPS) are obtained from optic tract by recording the evoked potentials generated by retinal stimulation. The flash VEP (FVEP) is used less frequently than pattern reversal VEP (PRVEP) because; it shows great variation in both latency and amplitude. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of change of wavelength of flash and change of check size on the parameters of visual evoked potential (amplitude and latency) in normal individuals and glaucoma patients. The group of healthy subjects in the age of 20-45 years while the group of glaucoma subjects where  in the age of 25-50 years.  The two groups were exposed to flash VEP with white light and blue color and they also were exposed to checks subtending a visual angles of 15, 30,60 and 120 minutes of arc. The measured data were statistically analyzed and summarized by histograms. The interindividual and intraindividual in latencies and amplitudes for FVEP were assessed using  the coefficient of variation (COV). In conclusion, monochromatic flash VEP was preferred than white as there were minimal inter and intra individual variation of latencies and amplitudes. The most preferred check size in PRVEP was 120' for  the two groups.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document