Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Induction and Glasdegib in Postremission Therapy in Patients With AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)

Author(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 2050313X2110155
Author(s):  
Sachio Fujita ◽  
Ryosuke Matsuno ◽  
Naoko Kawabata ◽  
Yumiko Sugishita ◽  
Ryota Kaneko ◽  
...  

Limited salvage chemotherapies are available for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Herein, we described successful reinduction chemotherapy, involving a combination of clofarabine, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide, in a 12-year-old male with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia prior to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from his father. Although treatment with a combination of fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, idarubicin, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin had no positive effects, the aforementioned clofarabine-based chemotherapy induced complete remission and allowed the transplantation to go ahead. The abovementioned regimen may be useful for induction chemotherapy prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.


Leukemia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1855-1868 ◽  
Author(s):  
C D Godwin ◽  
R P Gale ◽  
R B Walter

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (35) ◽  
pp. 4424-4430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Amadori ◽  
Stefan Suciu ◽  
Roberto Stasi ◽  
Helmut R. Salih ◽  
Dominik Selleslag ◽  
...  

Purpose This randomized trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of sequential gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) and standard chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods Patients (n = 472) age 61 to 75 years were randomly assigned to induction chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, cytarabine, and etoposide preceded, or not, by a course of GO (6 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15). In remission, patients received two consolidation courses with or without GO (3 mg/m2 on day 0). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results The overall response rate was comparable between the two arms (GO, 45%; no GO, 49%), but induction and 60-day mortality rates were higher in the GO arm (17% v 12% and 22% v 18%, respectively). With median follow-up of 5.2 years, median OS was 7.1 months in the GO arm and 10 months in the no-GO arm (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.45; P = .07). Other survival end points were similar in both arms. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic and liver toxicities were greater in the GO arm. Treatment with GO provided no benefit in any prognostic subgroup, with the possible exception of patients age < 70 years with secondary AML, but outcomes were significantly worse in the oldest age subgroup because of a higher risk of early mortality. Conclusion As used in this trial, the sequential combination of GO and standard chemotherapy provides no benefit for older patients with AML and is too toxic for those age ≥ 70 years.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document