scholarly journals Penilaian Pengetahuan Penugasan Dalam Pembelajaran di Sekolah

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
Jeprianto Jeprianto ◽  
Ubabuddin Ubabuddin ◽  
Herwani Herwani

Penilaian pengetahuan merupakan penilaian untuk mengukur kemampuan siswa yang meliputi pengetahuan faktual, konseptual, prosedural, dan metakognitif serta kecakapan berpikir tingkat rendah hingga tinggi. Penugasan adalah pemberian tugas kepada siswa untuk mengukur atau memfasilitasi siswa memperoleh atau meningkatkan pengetahuan. Penugasan yang berfungsi untuk penilaian dilakukan setelah proses pembelajaran Sedangkan penugasan sebagai metode penugasan bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan yang diberikan sebelum atau selama proses pembelajaran (assessment for learning). Tugas dapat dikerjakan baik secara individu maupun kelompok sesuai karakteristik tugas yang diberikan, yang dilakukan di sekolah, di rumah, dan di luar sekolah. Pada prinsipnya, penilaian melalui pendekatan penugasan adalah menilai hasil (produk) dari penugasan tersebut ada beberapa faktor yang harus diperhatikan dalam penilaian pengetahuan penugasan: 1) perencanaan penugasan, 2) pelaksanaan penugasan, 3) acuan kualitas tugas, 4) instrumen, dan 5) hasil penilain penugasan. 

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara King ◽  
Delia Wakelin ◽  
Julie Seed ◽  
Anita Navin ◽  
Vicki Oley ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-21
Author(s):  
Milton Raul Licona Luna ◽  
Elizabeth Alvarado Martínez

Institutions from basic to higher education in Mexico that offer courses of English as a Foreign Language rely heavily on the administering of assessment, usually a formal type of assessment. However, the literature shows how important it is the involvement of other types of assessment in the classroom for effective language learning to take place. For instance, assessment for learning, which consist of a continuous assessment where learners receive feedback so greater learning occurs, what is more, it enables teachers to modify their teaching ways as they reflect on the learners’ progress. To show how assessment is carried out in our context, this research project focuses on a case study within the CAADI from FOD in the UANL.


Author(s):  
Jordan D. Tayce ◽  
Ashley B. Saunders

The development of clinical reasoning skills is a high priority during clinical service, but an unpredictable case load and limited time for formal instruction makes it challenging for faculty to foster and assess students’ individual clinical reasoning skills. We developed an assessment for learning activity that helps students build their clinical reasoning skills based on a modified version of the script concordance test (SCT). To modify the standard SCT, we simplified it by limiting students to a 3-point Likert scale instead of a 5-point scale and added a free-text box for students to provide justification for their answer. Students completed the modified SCT during clinical rounds to prompt a group discussion with the instructor. Student feedback was positive, and the instructor gained valuable insight into the students’ thought process. A modified SCT can be adopted as part of a multimodal approach to teaching on the clinic floor. The purpose of this article is to describe our modifications to the standard SCT and findings from implementation in a clinical rounds setting as a method of formative assessment for learning and developing clinical reasoning skills.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document