Method of Calculation of Monolithic Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Interaction with the Base with Due Regard for Physically Nonlinear Work of Reinforced Concrete Structures

2019 ◽  
pp. 41-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.A. EVSEEV ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3.2) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
S A.Farzaliyev ◽  
. . ◽  
. .

Innovations' application of techniques and technologies to modern construction production, along with the reduction of manual labor, also boosts its technical and economic performance. Construction production is one of the fields in the country that plays the most important role and reflects the dynamics of the development of the economy in itself.  In our country, the issue of organizing a cheap housing market has an importance among  a number of socio-economic issues. The programmes adopted in this direction and the initiatives  dealing with the improvement of housing conditions for people from a number of categories are evident proof of this. And this, in its  turn, requires the solution of a number of organizational and technological problems of construction work carried out by monolithic reinforced concrete structures before both the designers and builders. The article explores the ways of timely commissioning of high-rise monolithic reinforced concrete buildings, improving the organization of work, and increasing the technological efficiency to reduce the cost of construction products. It was determined that during the reinforcement of monolithic reinforced concrete structures, automation of works will reduce labor costs, material consumption, product cost and construction time, while technological efficiency is increasing.  


Author(s):  
O. A. Glogau

The New Zealand Loading Code sets earthquake design levels which are intended, amongst other factors, to reflect the manner in which seismic energy will be dissipated by a structure. In this paper the load levels prescribed for reinforced concrete structures unlikely to behave in a flexural ductile manner, are compared with the strength and behaviour of structures of similar type affected by 3 recent Japanese earthquakes. The adequacy of some of the provisions in the current loading and concrete code and modifications proposed for the design of these so called structures of limited ductility in a companion paper by L.M. Robinson are examined.


Currently, prefabricated reinforced concrete structures are widely used for the construction of buildings of various functional purposes. In this regard, has been developed SP 356.1325800.2017 "Frame Reinforced Concrete Prefabricated Structures of Multi-Storey Buildings. Design Rules", which establishes requirements for the calculation and design of precast reinforced concrete structures of frame buildings of heavy, fine-grained and lightweight structural concrete for buildings with a height of not more than 75 m. The structure of the set of rules consists of eight sections and one annex. The document reviewed covers the design of multi-story framed beam structural systems, the elements of which are connected in a spatial system with rigid (partially compliant) or hinged joints and concreting of the joints between the surfaces of the abutting precast elements. The classification of structural schemes of building frames, which according to the method of accommodation of horizontal loads are divided into bracing, rigid frame bracing and framework, is presented. The list of structural elements, such as foundations, columns, crossbars, ribbed and hollow floor slabs and coatings, stiffness elements and external enclosing structures is given; detailed instructions for their design are provided. The scope of the developed set of rules includes all natural and climatic zones of the Russian Federation, except seismic areas with 7 or more points, as well as permafrost zones.


Problems when calculating reinforced concrete structures based on the concrete deformation under compression diagram, which is presented both in Russian and foreign regulatory documents on the design of concrete and reinforced concrete structures are considered. The correctness of their compliance for all classes of concrete remains very approximate, especially a significant difference occurs when using Euronorm due to the different shape and sizes of the samples. At present, there are no methodical recommendations for determining the ultimate relative deformations of concrete under axial compression and the construction of curvilinear deformation diagrams, which leads to limited experimental data and, as a result, does not make it possible to enter more detailed ultimate strain values into domestic standards. The results of experimental studies to determine the ultimate relative deformations of concrete under compression for different classes of concrete, which allowed to make analytical dependences for the evaluation of the ultimate relative deformations and description of curvilinear deformation diagrams, are presented. The article discusses various options for using the deformation model to assess the stress-strain state of the structure, it is concluded that it is necessary to use not only the finite values of the ultimate deformations, but also their intermediate values. This requires reliable diagrams "s–e” for all classes of concrete. The difficulties of measuring deformations in concrete subjected to peak load, corresponding to the prismatic strength, as well as main cracks that appeared under conditions of long-term step loading are highlighted. Variants of more accurate measurements are proposed. Development and implementation of the new standard GOST "Concretes. Methods for determination of complete diagrams" on the basis of the developed method for obtaining complete diagrams of concrete deformation under compression for the evaluation of ultimate deformability of concrete under compression are necessary.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
SINGH RAVIKANT ◽  
KUMAR SINGH VINAY ◽  
YADAV MAHESH ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Badrinarayan Rath ◽  
◽  
Shirish Deo ◽  
Gangadhar Ramtekkar ◽  
◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 99 (7) ◽  
pp. 1663-1670
Author(s):  
Eftychia Apostolidi ◽  
Nikolitsa Karela ◽  
Stephanos Dritsos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document