scholarly journals Minimally invasive tubular microdiscectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Hubbe ◽  
Pamela Franco-Jimenez ◽  
Jan-Helge Klingler ◽  
Ioannis Vasilikos ◽  
Christoph Scholz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
P Value ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation

OBJECT The aim of the study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive tubular microdiscectomy for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation (LDH). As opposed to endoscopic techniques, namely microendoscopic and endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, this microscopically assisted technique has never been used for the treatment of recurrent LDH. METHODS Thirty consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive tubular microdiscectomy for recurrent LDH were included in the study. The preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain, the clinical outcome according to modified Macnab criteria, and complications were analyzed retrospectively. The minimum follow-up was 1.5 years. Student t-test with paired samples was used for the statistical comparison of pre- and postoperative VAS scores. A p value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS The mean operating time was 90 ± 35 minutes. The VAS score for leg pain was significantly reduced from 5.9 ± 2.1 preoperatively to 1.7 ± 1.3 postoperatively (p < 0.001). The overall success rate (excellent or good outcome according to Macnab criteria) was 90%. Incidental durotomy occurred in 5 patients (16.7%) without neurological consequences, CSF fistula, or negative influence to the clinical outcome. Instability occurred in 2 patients (6.7%). CONCLUSIONS The clinical outcome of minimally invasive tubular microdiscectomy is comparable to the reported success rates of other minimally invasive techniques. The dural tear rate is not associated to higher morbidity or worse outcome. The technique is an equally effective and safe treatment option for recurrent LDH.

scholarly journals Learning curve of trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression in herniated lumbar disc disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong Son ◽  
Chan Jong Yoo ◽  
Byung Rhae Yoo ◽  
Woo Seok Kim ◽  
Tae Seok Jeong
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Early Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Late Group

Abstract Background: Trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression (SELD) using slender epiduroscope and a holmium YAG laser is one of the minimally invasive surgical options for lumbar disc herniation. However, the learning curve of SELD and the effect of surgical proficiency on clinical outcome have not yet been established. We investigated patients with lumbar disc herniation undergoing SELD to report the clinical outcome and learning curve. Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical outcome and learning curve were performed at a single center from clinical data collected from November 2015 to November 2018. A total of 82 patients who underwent single-level SELD for lumbar disc herniation with a minimum follow-up of 6.0 months were enrolled. Based on the findings that the cut-off of familiarity was 20 cases according to the cumulative study of operation time, patients were allocated to two groups: early group (n = 20) and late group (n = 62). The surgical, clinical, and radiological outcomes were retrospectively evaluated between the two groups to analyze the learning curve of SELD.Results: According to linear and log regression analyses, the operation time was obtained by the formula: operation time = 58.825 - (0.181 × [case number]) (p < 0.001). The mean operation time was significantly different between the two groups (mean 56.95 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 49.12–64.78 in the early group versus mean 45.34 minutes; 95% CI, 42.45–48.22 in the late group; p = 0.008, non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test).Baseline characteristics, including demographic data, clinical factors, and findings of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, did not differ between the two groups. Also, there was no significant difference in terms of surgical outcomes, including complication and failure rates, as well as clinical and radiological outcomes between the two groups.Conclusion: The learning curve of SELD was not as steep as that of other minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques, and the experience of surgery was not an influencing factor for outcome variation.

scholarly journals Learning curve of trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression in herniated lumbar disc disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong Son ◽  
Chan Jong Yoo ◽  
Byung Rhae Yoo ◽  
Woo Seok Kim ◽  
Tae Seok Jeong
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Early Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Late Group

Abstract Background: Trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression (SELD) using slender epiduroscope and a holmium YAG laser is one of the minimally invasive surgical options for lumbar disc herniation.However, the learning curve of SELD and the effect of surgical proficiency on clinical outcome have not yet been established. We investigated patients with lumbar disc herniation undergoing SELD to report the clinical outcome and learning curve.Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical outcome and learning curve were performed at a single center from clinical data collected from November 2015 to November 2018. A total of 82 patients who underwent single-level SELD for lumbar disc herniation with a minimum follow-up of 6.0 months were enrolled. Based on the findings that the cut-off of familiarity was 20 cases according to the cumulative study of operation time, patients were allocated to two groups: early group (n = 20) and late group (n = 62). The surgical, clinical, and radiological outcomes were retrospectively evaluated between the two groups to analyze the learning curve of SELD.Results: According to linear and log regression analyses, the operation time was obtained by the formula: operation time = 58.825 - (0.181 × [case number]) (p < 0.001). The mean operation time was significantly different between the two groups (mean 56.95 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 49.12–64.78 in the early group versus mean 45.34 minutes; 95% CI, 42.45–48.22 in the late group; p = 0.008, non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test).Baseline characteristics, including demographic data, clinical factors, and findings of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, did not differ between the two groups. Also, there was no significant difference in terms of surgical outcomes, including complication and failure rates, as well as clinical and radiological outcomes between the two groups.Conclusion: The learning curve of SELD was not as steep as that of other minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques, and the experience of surgery was not an influencing factor for outcome variation.

scholarly journals Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus microdiscectomy: an Indian rural experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 1141
Author(s):  
Prakash U. Chavan ◽  
Mahendra Gudhe ◽  
Ashok Munde ◽  
Balaji Jadhav
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Single Level ◽  
Group I ◽  
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The objective of the study was to compare surgical outcome of micro-discectomy with transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for single level lumbar disc herniation in Indian rural population.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Retrospective comparative study was designed during the period of October 2012 to June 2015, patients in the age group of 22-75 years with unremitting sciatica with/without back pain, and/or a neurological deficit that correlated with appropriate level and side of neural compression as revealed on MRI, with single level lumbar disc herniation who underwent either microdiscectomy or TPELD were included in the study. Patients were assessed on visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, modified macnabs criteria, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Group I (MD) included 44 patients and Group II (TPELD) included 20 patients. Significant improvement was seen in claudication symptom post-operatively in both MD and TPELD. Mean operating time was significantly shorter in MD group (1.11 hrs vs. 1.32 hrs; p&lt;0.01). According to modified MacNab's criteria,<strong> </strong>outcome were excellent (81.8%), good (9.09%) and fair<strong> </strong>(9.09%) in MD. Similarly, in TPELD, 80%, 15% and 5% patients had excellent, good and fair outcome respectively. In both groups, no one had a poor outcome. Thus, overall success rate was 100% in the study.</p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> TPELD and MD have comparable post-operative outcome in most of the efficacy parameters in Indian rural patients undergoing treatment of single level lumbar disc herniation. Additionally, TPELD offers distinct advantages such as performed under local anaesthesia, preservation of structure, lesser post-operative pain and early mobilization and discharge from hospital.

scholarly journals Learning curve of trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression in herniated lumbar disc disease

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong Son ◽  
Chan Jong Yoo ◽  
Byung Rhae Yoo ◽  
Woo Seok Kim ◽  
Tae Seok Jeong
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Early Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Late Group

Abstract Background Trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression (SELD) using slender epiduroscope and a holmium YAG laser is one of the minimally invasive surgical options for lumbar disc herniation. However, the learning curve of SELD and the effect of surgical proficiency on clinical outcome have not yet been established. We investigated patients with lumbar disc herniation undergoing SELD to report the clinical outcome and learning curve. Methods Retrospective analysis of clinical outcome and learning curve were performed at a single center from clinical data collected from November 2015 to November 2018. A total of 82 patients who underwent single-level SELD for lumbar disc herniation with a minimum follow-up of 6.0 months were enrolled. Based on the findings that the cut-off of familiarity was 20 cases according to the cumulative study of operation time, patients were allocated to two groups: early group (n = 20) and late group (n = 62). The surgical, clinical, and radiological outcomes were retrospectively evaluated between the two groups to analyze the learning curve of SELD. Results According to linear and log regression analyses, the operation time was obtained by the formula: operation time = 58.825–(0.181 × [case number]) (p < 0.001). The mean operation time was significantly different between the two groups (mean 56.95 min; 95% confidence interval [CI], 49.12–64.78 in the early group versus mean 45.34 min; 95% CI, 42.45–48.22 in the late group; p = 0.008, non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test). Baseline characteristics, including demographic data, clinical factors, and findings of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, did not differ between the two groups. Also, there was no significant difference in terms of surgical outcomes, including complication and failure rates, as well as clinical and radiological outcomes between the two groups. Conclusion The learning curve of SELD was not as steep as that of other minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques, and the experience of surgery was not an influencing factor for outcome variation.

scholarly journals Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Narrative Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Epidural Fibrosis ◽  
Fusion Procedure ◽  
Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation

This narrative review aimed to identify various risk factors of recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) post-discectomy and its management. The rLDH has remained a challenging problem for spine surgeons. The incidence of rLDH is reported widely from 1% to 21%. Many possible patient-related, disc-related, and surgery-related risk factors may predispose the patient to rLDH. Moreover, the clinical and radiological diagnosis of rLDH can be challenging. Once the diagnosis is confirmed, and alternative diagnoses for leg pain have been ruled out, a course of initial non-operative treatment can be attempted. Compared to primary LDH, non-operative treatment is less likely to succeed in rLDH, possibly due to the associated epidural fibrosis and scarring. Various surgical options can be considered, including revision discectomy and fusion. Revision discectomy is usually the primary choice of surgery for the first recurrence. A fusion procedure can be chosen for those who have repeated reherniations or significant associated back pain. Precise patient selection is a must to achieve excellent surgical outcomes. Keywords: Lumbar disc herniation, recurrent herniation, discectomy, risk factor, Epidural fibrosis, narrative review.

scholarly journals Outcomes following discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in patients with substantial back pain

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 623-626
Author(s):  
Simon Thorbjørn Sørensen ◽  
Rachid Bech-Azeddine ◽  
Søren Fruensgaard ◽  
Mikkel Østerheden Andersen ◽  
Leah Carreon
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
The Mean

OBJECTIVEPatients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) typically present with lower-extremity radiculopathy. However, there are patients who have concomitant substantial back pain (BP) and are considered candidates for fusion. The purpose of this study was to determine if patients with LDH and substantial BP improve with discectomy alone.METHODSThe DaneSpine database was used to identify 2399 patients with LDH and baseline BP visual analog scale (VAS) scores ≥ 50 who underwent a lumbar discectomy at one of 3 facilities between June 2010 and December 2017. Standard demographic and surgical variables and patient-reported outcomes, including BP and leg pain (LP) VAS scores (0–100), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and European Quality of Life–5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) at baseline and 12 months postoperatively, were collected.RESULTSA total of 1654 patients (69%) had 12-month data available, with a mean age of 48.7 years; 816 (49%) were male and the mean BMI was 27 kg/m2. At 12 months postoperatively, there were statistically significant improvements (p < 0.0001) in BP (72.6 to 36.9), LP (74.8 to 32.6), ODI (50.9 to 25.1), and EQ-5D (0.25 to 0.65) scores.CONCLUSIONSPatients with LDH and LP and concomitant substantial BP can be counseled to expect improvement in their BP 12 months after surgery after a discectomy alone, as well as improvement in their LP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document