Instability of the craniovertebral junction and treatment outcomes in patients with Down's syndrome

1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. E5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek A. Taggard ◽  
Arnold H. Menezes ◽  
Timothy C. Ryken

Operative intervention for the treatment of instability at the craniovertebral junction in patients with Down's syndrome has become somewhat controversial because some authors have reported high surgery-related complication rates and suggested that the incidence of neurological abnormality associated with this abnormal motion may be low. In this report, the authors describe the clinical and radiographic findings in 33 patients treated at their institution. Common presenting symptoms included neck pain (14 patients), torticollis (12 patients), and myelopathy manifested as hyperreflexia (21 patients), or varying degrees of quadriparesis (11 patients). Four patients suffered acute neurological insults, two after receiving routine general anesthetics for minor surgical procedures and two other patients following minor falls. Atlantoaxial instability was the most common abnormality documented on radiography (22 patients). Atlantooccipital instability (15 patients) was also frequently observed and was coexistent with the presence of atlantoaxial luxations in 14 patients. A rotary component of the atlantoaxial luxation was present in 13 cases. In 17 patients bony anomalies were present, the most frequent of which was os odontoideum (10 patients). Twenty-four patients underwent operative intervention, and successful fusion was achieved in 23. In six of nine patients with basilar invagination, reduction was achieved with preoperative traction and thus avoided the need for ventral decompressive procedures. There were no cases of postoperative deterioration, and 22 patients made excellent or good recoveries. The results of this series highlight the clinicopathological phenomena of craniovertebral instability in patients with Down's syndrome and suggest that satisfactory outcomes can be achieved with a low rate of surgical morbidity.

2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek A. Taggard ◽  
Arnold H. Menezes ◽  
Timothy C. Ryken

Object. Operative intervention for craniovertebral junction (CVJ) instability in patients with Down syndrome has become controversial, with reports of a low incidence of associated neurological dysfunction and high surgical morbidity rates. The authors analyzed their experience in light of these poor results and attempted to evaluate differences in management. Methods. Medical and radiographic records of 36 consecutive patients with Down syndrome and CVJ abnormalities were reviewed. The most common clinical complaints included neck pain (15 patients) and torticollis (12 patients). Cervicomedullary compression was associated with ataxia and progressive weakness. Hyperreflexia was documented in a majority of patients (24 cases), and 13 patients suffered from varying degrees of quadriparesis. Upper respiratory tract infection precipitated the presentation in five patients. Four patients suffered acute neurological insults after a minor fall and two after receiving a general anesthetic agent. Atlantoaxial instability was the most common radiographically observed abnormality (23 patients), with a rotary component present in 14 patients. Occipitoatlantal instability was also frequently observed (16 patients) and was coexistent with atlantoaxial dislocation in 15 patients. Twenty individuals had bone anomalies, the most frequent of which was os odontoideum (12 patients) followed by atlantal arch hypoplasia and bifid anterior or posterior arches (eight patients). Twenty-seven patients underwent surgical procedures without subsequent neurological deterioration, and a 96% fusion rate was observed. In five of 11 patients basilar invagination was irreducible and required transoral decompression. Overall, 24 patients enjoyed good or excellent outcomes. Conclusions. The results of this series highlight the clinicopathological characteristics of CVJ instability in patients with Down syndrome and suggest that satisfactory outcomes can be achieved with low surgical morbidity rates.


BMJ ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 294 (6586) ◽  
pp. 1549-1549
Author(s):  
B Jagjivan ◽  
P A Spencer ◽  
G Hosking

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga M. Sergeenko ◽  
Konstantin A. Dyachkov ◽  
Sergey O. Ryabykh ◽  
Alexander V. Burtsev ◽  
Alexander V. Gubin

Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atul Goel ◽  
Trimurti Nadkarni ◽  
Abhidha Shah ◽  
Raghvendra Ramdasi ◽  
Neeraj Patni

Abstract BACKGROUND: On reviewing the database of patients with craniovertebral junction anomalies, the authors identified 70 patients with a bifid posterior arch of atlas. OBJECTIVE: To speculate on the pathogenesis of spondyloschisis of both the anterior and posterior arches of atlas, particularly as it relates to atlantoaxial instability. METHODS: Seventy patients with bifid anterior and posterior arches were identified by a retrospective review of the database from 2007 to 2013. RESULTS: The ages of the patients ranged from 14 months to 50 years. The patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 (3 patients) had multiple additional spinal bony and neural abnormalities. Group 2 (34 patients) had mobile and partially (5) or completely (29) reducible atlantoaxial dislocation. Group 3 (33 patients) had atlantoaxial instability and related basilar invagination. The os odontoideum was identified in 21 patients, and C2-3 fusion was seen in 24 patients. Two of 3 patients in group 1 were treated conservatively and without any surgery. All patients in groups 2 and 3 were surgically treated. Surgery was done using lateral mass plate/rod and screw fixation techniques. The general observation during surgery included identification of discrete movements of both halves of the atlas, lateral positioning of the facets of atlas in relation to the facets of the axis and occipital condyle and closer approximation of the occipital bone, atlas, and axis resulting in “crumpling” of bone and neural elements. CONCLUSION: Understanding of the pathogenesis and mechanical alterations in cases with a bifid arch of atlas can assist in evaluating the clinical implications and in conduct of surgery.


BMJ ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 294 (6578) ◽  
pp. 988-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
R A Collacott

1984 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Cooke

Atlantoaxial Instability occurs in approximately 17% of all persons with Down’s syndrome. Such persons are susceptible to serious spinal cord injury if marked flexion of the neck occurs. Every person with Down’s syndrome should have cervical spine x-rays before performing in certain sports even though the frequency of sports-induced neurological damage is low.


1995 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
R E Morton ◽  
M A Khan ◽  
C Murray-Leslie ◽  
S Elliott

2009 ◽  
Vol 48 (173) ◽  
Author(s):  
Basant Bhattarai ◽  
AH Kulkarni ◽  
S Kalingarayar ◽  
MP Upadya

Down's syndrome is the most commonly encountered congenital anomaly in medical practice. These patients are of special concern to medical practice because of their associated problems with regard to respiratory, cardiovascular and other systemic problems. As these patients present for repeated surgeries like dental extraction, facial reconstruction and fixation of cervical spine, these patients pose challenges to the anesthesiologist because of their unique set of problems, namely atlantoaxial instability, small trachea, congenital heart disease and repeated chest infections due to lowered immunity. Their reactivity to inhalational anesthetics and atropine is variable. Here we present an interesting case report of a child with Down's syndrome who presented with atlantoaxial instability for MRI of cervical spine under general anesthesia.KeyWords:atlanto axial instability, down’s syndrome, trisomy 21


2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
pp. 633-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Rosellen Dedlow ◽  
Siraj Siddiqi ◽  
Donald J. Fillipps ◽  
Maria N. Kelly ◽  
John A. Nackashi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document