International Justice and South-North Korean Relations for Korean Unification

Kjersti Lohne describes the impact of non-governmental organizations at the International Criminal Court (ICC), in particular discussing the relative lack of regard for defendants’ rights, and especially highlighting the difficulties encountered by those acquitted. After the Coalition for the International Criminal Court contributed to the establishment of the ICC itself in the fight against impunity for international crimes, that Coalition has continued a victim-oriented approach, arguably at the expense of defendants’ rights. The ICC’s focus on victims, ‘truth’, and ‘memory’ may challenge the legitimacy of the Court in the longer run.

Download Full-text

Judgments of the Permanent Court of International Justice in the Cases Submitted through Special Agreements

Remedies before the International Court of Justice ◽

10.1017/9781108855006.018 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 174-176

Keyword(s):

International Justice

Download Full-text

Japan's Two Koreas Policy and the Problems of Korean Unification

Asian Survey ◽

10.2307/2642420 ◽

1967 ◽

Vol 7 (10) ◽

pp. 703-725

Author(s):

Soon Sung Cho

Keyword(s):

Korean Unification

Download Full-text

The Eligibility of British Subjects as Judges of the Permanent Court of International Justice

The American Journal of International Law ◽

10.2307/2188691 ◽

1926 ◽

Vol 20 (4) ◽

pp. 714-725

Author(s):

Walter Pollak

Keyword(s):

Present Article ◽

British Empire ◽

International Justice

The object of the present article is to attempt an interpretation of paragraph two of Article 10 of the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice in order to discover, if possible, the position of the British Empire and of the British Dominions in regard to the election of judges of the Permanent Court.

Download Full-text

Remarks by Bert Lockwood

The American Journal of International Law ◽

10.1017/s000293000026466x ◽

1973 ◽

Vol 67 (5) ◽

pp. 82-86

Author(s):

Bert Lockwood ◽

Beatrice Brickell

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Human Rights ◽

Political Process ◽

The United States ◽

International Justice ◽

The Political ◽

Political Rights ◽

Southern Rhodesia

I would like to address myself to international outlaws and what domestic procedures are available to arrest their activities. While at first glance the nexus between domestic justice and international justice may seem tenuous, I wonder: Is it surprising that the same administration that is so insensate over the deprivation of the human rights of blacks in Southern Rhodesia is the same administration that proclaimed early in its tenure that if you have seen one slum you have pretty much seen them all, and hasn’t visited another since? Is it surprising that the same administration that evidences so little concern over the political rights of the majority in Rhodesia is the same administration that “bugs” and sabotages the political process within the United States?

Download Full-text