Биология размножения большой конюги ( Aethia cristatella , Alcidae, Charadriiformes) в северной части Охотского моря

2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-408
Author(s):  
Е. Ю. Голубова
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christy N. Wails ◽  
Eva D. Gruber ◽  
Ethan Slattery ◽  
Lucy Smith ◽  
Heather L. Major

2017 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christy N. Wails ◽  
Heather L. Major

Prebreeding, subadult seabirds have been documented prospecting or visiting multiple sites throughout the breeding season to gather information on colony reproductive success, identify suitable habitat, evaluate prey abundance, and locate potential partners; however, many aspects of prospector biology remain unknown. We explored prospector behaviour as a means of furthering our understanding of postnatal seabird dispersal and colony attendance using Least Auklets (Aethia pusilla (Pallas, 1811)) and Crested Auklets (Aethia cristatella (Pallas, 1769)) breeding at Gareloi Island, Alaska, in 2014 and 2015. We recorded age class, length of time spent on the colony, and behaviour for individuals attending a study plot over the course of two breeding seasons. Although prospectors typically spent more time on the colony surface than adults, prospectors rarely socialized with conspecifics during their visits to the colony, possibly due to the absence of a citrus-like feather odour used in olfactory communication. Additionally, we found substantial differences between observed and predicted data between years, demonstrating that other factors (likely prey abundance or quality) influenced behaviour in 2015. Our results suggest that the collective knowledge of seabird prospecting behaviour is not necessarily transferable between taxa and there may be a range of strategies employed by prospectors when assessing colonies.


Waterbirds ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 507-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Shawkey ◽  
M. Jawaad Hussain ◽  
Aaron L. Strong ◽  
Julie C. Hagelin ◽  
Amy C. Vollmer ◽  
...  

The Condor ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail S. Fraser ◽  
Ian L. Jones ◽  
Fiona M. Hunter

Abstract We studied patterns of parental care in Crested Auklets (Aethia cristatella), a monogamous seabird, for three breeding seasons (1996–1998) in the Aleutian Islands, Alaska, using radio-telemetry. In 1996, we found no sexual differences in parental care, low breeding site attendance rates, and reduced occurrences of copepods in food samples delivered to chicks, suggesting that food availability may have been low. In 1997 and 1998, we found significant differences in parental care between males and females, particularly early in the chick-rearing period: males attended and brooded their single chick 75% and 90% longer than females, while females provisioned 33% and 36% more often than males, respectively. We also found significant differences between prey types delivered to chicks by males and females for these two years. Males brought in 30% more euphausiids, a relatively large pelagic crustacean, than females, whereas females brought in 36% more copepods, a smaller crustacean, than males; however, prey mass per load did not differ. In 1998, we experimentally measured how vulnerable unattended young chicks were using models placed in unoccupied crevices. Eighty-three percent of the models showed signs of attack, presumably by conspecific adults. We concluded that unattended Crested Auklet chicks are highly vulnerable to attack. We suggest that males took on a greater role in chick brooding than their mates because they have a larger and more strongly hooked bill and are more aggressive than females, and thus better equipped than females to guard young chicks or the crevice breeding site. Diferencias en el Cuidado Parental entre Machos y Hembras en la Especie Monógama Aethia cristatella Resumen. Utilizando radiotelemetría para estudiar los patrones de cuidado parental en Aethia cristatella, un ave marina monógama, durante tres períodos reproductivos (1996–1998) en las Islas Aleutianas, Alaska. En 1996 no encontramos diferencias sexuales en el cuidado parental, encontramos bajas tasas de presencia en el lugar de nidificación, y baja ocurrencia de copépodos en las muestras de alimento entregadas a los polluelos, lo cual sugiere que la disponibilidad de alimento podría haber sido baja. En 1997 y 1998 encontramos diferencias significativas en el cuidado parental entre hembras y machos, particularmente en el período temprano de cría de los polluelos. Los machos asistieron y empollaron su único polluelo por un período un 75% y 90% más largo que las hembras, mientras que las hembras aprovisionaron con una frecuencia un 33% y 36% mayor que los machos, respectivamente. También encontramos diferencias significativas entre el tipo de presa entregado por las hembras y por los machos durante los dos años. Los machos entregaron un 30% más de eufáusidos (crustáceos pelágico relativamente grandes) que las hembras, mientras que éstas entregaron un 36% más de copépodos (crustáceos más pequeños) que los machos. Sin embargo, el peso de la carga de alimento no varió. En 1998 medimos experimentalmente la vulnerabilidad de los polluelos no cuidados utilizando modelos situados en grietas desocupadas. El 83% de los modelos presentaron signos de ataques presumiblemente producidos por adultos coespecíficos. Concluimos que los polluelos no cuidados de A. cristatella son altamente vulnerables a ataques. Sugerimos que los machos tomaron un rol más importante en la crianza de los polluelos que sus parejas debido a que ellos presentan un pico más grande y fuertemente arqueado y son más agresivos que las hembras. Por lo tanto están mejor equipados que las hembras para proteger a los polluelos o proteger el sitio de nidificación.


1969 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1025-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Bédard

The feeding habits of three plankton-feeding Alcidae, the least, crested, and parakeet auklets were studied on St. Lawrence Island, Alaska, between 1964 and 1966. The crested and the least auklets (Aethia cristatella, A. pusilla) exhibit similar patterns of dependence upon the food resources: both have, during early summer, a diversified diet consisting of mysids, hyperiids, gammarids, etc., but restrict themselves largely to one principal prey during the chick-rearing period. Then, A. pusilla eats mostly Calanus sp. while A. cristatella eats Thysanoessa spp. In all years, hatching coincided closely with the appearance of these prey items (copepods and euphausids) in the environment and it is argued that the timing of the auklets' breeding season has been adjusted to their cyclical abundance. Cyclorrhynchus psittacula, the parakeet auklet, maintains a diversified diet throughout the summer: Parathemisto libellula, a pelagic amphipod, is the dominant prey in its diet.The three species are found feeding together and are presumed to use the same depth range. Segregation in feeding between A. cristatella and A. pusilla is achieved by difference in bill size. This difference is sufficient to impose obligatory feeding upon different resources. Segregation between two possible competitors, A. cristatella and Cyclorrhynchus, seems to rest upon innate preferences for different prey types, minor structural differences in the feeding apparatus, and differences in foraging habits: the relative importance of each of these factors remains to be established.As a whole, the amount of overlap in feeding between the three species studied is very small.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document