Risky Decision Making Across Three Arenas of Choice: Are Younger and Older Adults Differently Susceptible to Framing Effects?

2005 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael RÖnnlund ◽  
Erik Karlsson ◽  
Erica Laggnäs ◽  
Lisa Larsson ◽  
Therese Lindström
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendra L. Seaman ◽  
Chelsea M. Stillman ◽  
Darlene V. Howard ◽  
James H. Howard

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 530-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Guo ◽  
Jennifer S. Trueblood ◽  
Adele Diederich

Every day, people face snap decisions when time is a limiting factor. In addition, the way a problem is presented can influence people’s choices, which creates what are known as framing effects. In this research, we explored how time pressure interacts with framing effects in risky decision making. Specifically, does time pressure strengthen or weaken framing effects? On one hand, research has suggested that framing effects evolve through the deliberation process, growing larger with time. On the other hand, dual-process theory attributes framing effects to an intuitive, emotional system that responds automatically to stimuli. In our experiments, participants made decisions about gambles framed in terms of either gains or losses, and time pressure was manipulated across blocks. Results showed increased framing effects under time pressure in both hypothetical and incentivized choices, which supports the dual-process hypothesis that these effects arise from a fast, intuitive system.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1043
Author(s):  
Thomas Tannou ◽  
Eloi Magnin ◽  
Alexandre Comte ◽  
Régis Aubry ◽  
Sven Joubert

Decision making is a complex cognitive phenomenon commonly used in everyday life. Studies have shown differences in behavioral strategies in risky decision-making tasks over the course of aging. The development of functional neuroimaging has gradually allowed the exploration of the neurofunctional bases of these behaviors. The purpose of our study was to carry out a meta-analysis on the neural networks underlying risky decision making in healthy older adults. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched for fMRI studies of decision making in older adults using risky decision-making tasks. To perform the quantitative meta-analysis, we used the revised version of the activation likelihood estimation (ALE) algorithm. A total of 620 references were selected for initial screening. Among these, five studies with a total of 98 cognitively normal older participants (mean age: 69.5 years) were included. The meta-analysis yielded two clusters. Main activations were found in the right insula, bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Despite the limited number of studies included, our meta-analysis highlights the crucial involvement of circuits associated with both emotion regulation and the decision to act. However, in contrast to the literature on young adults, our results indicate a different pattern of hemispheric lateralization in older participants. These activations can be used as a minimum pattern of activation in the risky decision-making tasks of healthy older subjects.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua A. Weller ◽  
Tony W. Buchanan ◽  
Crystal Shackleford ◽  
Arielle Morganstern ◽  
Joshua J. Hartman ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan J. Rolison ◽  
Yaniv Hanoch ◽  
Stacey Wood

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document