dual process theory
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

189
(FIVE YEARS 56)

H-INDEX

26
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-36
Author(s):  
Emily Harris ◽  
Lekshmi Santhosh

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Kim ◽  
Joseph Valacich ◽  
Jeff Jenkins ◽  
Manasvi Kumar ◽  
Alan Dennis

Online travel reviews (OTRs) are used by travelers to plan and book their holiday particular by the free and easy traveler. Hence, it is essential for hoteliers to understand the factors that affect and empower travelers when using OTRs to plan their holidays. This study has adopted three theories: dual-process theory, psychological empowerment (PE) and TPB. These theories were used to test additional dimensions of the informational and normative social influence, its links with perceived empowerment, and their impact on the intention to use OTRs. Using SmartPLS to analyze the data collected from 392 Malaysian, the results show that PE is significantly affected by informational and normative social influence, from travelers’ perception of PE positively affects their attitude toward using OTRs, and attitude significantly influences intention to use OTRs when plans for travel. Furthermore, the research findings contribute to the literature on travelers’ behavioral intention; this study also has direct implications for online travel providers.


Diametros ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaliy Nadurak

The article proposes a consideration of the dual-process theory of higher cognition as a theory of the classification of acts of information processing. One of the reasons why the dual-process approach has been criticized is the fact that the information processing process can sometimes have characteristics that undermine a clear-cut attribution to one of the two traditionally defined opposite types. To avoid this criticism, it is proposed that the object of classification should not be the processes of information processing, but separate acts of combining two units of information. Unlike a process, a particular act of information processing at a particular moment in time cannot simultaneously have opposite characteristics, nor can it simultaneously have and not have some characteristic. In order to show the qualitative difference between various information processing acts as falling individually into either Type 1 or Type 2 processing, it is proposed to classify them by a feature that is present in one type and absent in another. It is suggested to take conscious control as such a feature. As a result, in the information processing acts corresponding to Type 2 category, units of information are combined in a consciously controlled way, whereas in the acts to be considered as Type 1, those units either already are combined or combine autonomously due to the existence of indirect associative connections.


2021 ◽  
pp. 21-60
Author(s):  
Richard F. Thompson ◽  
Stephen D. Berry ◽  
Patricia C. Rinaldi ◽  
Theodore W. Berger

2021 ◽  
pp. 105971232110173
Author(s):  
Zachariah A Neemeh

Dual-process theories divide cognition into two kinds of processes: Type 1 processes that are autonomous and do not use working memory, and Type 2 processes that are decoupled from the immediate situation and use working memory. Often, Type 1 processes are also fast, high capacity, parallel, nonconscious, biased, contextualized, and associative, while Type 2 processes are typically slow, low capacity, serial, conscious, normative, abstract, and rule-based. This article argues for an embodied dual-process theory based on the phenomenology of Martin Heidegger. According to Heidegger, the basis of human agents’ encounters with the world is in a prereflective, pragmatically engaged disposition marked by readiness-to-hand ( Zuhandenheit), sometimes equated with “smooth coping.” Examples of smooth coping include walking, throwing a ball, and other embodied actions that do not require reflective thought. I argue that smooth coping primarily consists of Type 1 processes. The Heideggerian dual-process model yields distinctly different hypotheses from Hubert Dreyfus’ model of smooth coping, and I will critically engage with Dreyfus’ work.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toby Keene ◽  
Kristen Pammer ◽  
Bill Lord ◽  
Carol Shipp

Introduction. Previous research has shown that paramedics form intuitive impressions based on limited ‘pre-arrival’ dispatch information and this subsequently affects their diagnosis. However, this observation has never been experimentally studied. Method. This was an experimental study of 83 Australian undergraduate paramedics and 65 Australian paramedics with median 14 years’ experience (Range: 1 – 32 years). Participants responded to written vignettes in two parts that aimed to induce an intuitive impression by placing participants under time pressure and with a secondary task, followed by a diagnosis made without distraction or time pressure. The vignettes varied the likelihood of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), and measured self-reports of typicality and confidence. Answer fluency, which is the ease with which the answer comes to mind, was also measured.Results. There was a difference in the proportion of participants diagnosing ACS according to what pre-arrival information was seen (.85 [95%CI: .78, .90] vs .74 [95%CI: .66, .81]; p = .03). Paramedics with greater than 14 years’ experience, were more likely to be affected by pre-arrival information in their diagnosis (.94 [78, .99] vs .67 [95%CI .48, .81]; p = .01). Answer fluency and confidence predicted impression, while the impression and confidence predicted final diagnosis.Conclusion. We have experimentally shown that pre-arrival information can affect subsequent diagnosis, increasing the chance of diagnostic error. The most experienced paramedics were most likely to be affected.


2021 ◽  
pp. 80-155
Author(s):  
Christoph Lütge ◽  
Matthias Uhl

This chapter introduces the most important interdisciplinary foundations and tools of business ethics. First, the authors discuss the philosophical foundations and concepts. The most important normative ethical theories, the notion of a reflective equilibrium, and several tools for justifying norms under dissent are introduced. Second, economic and socio-scientific foundations and tools are discussed, scrutinizing different concepts of rationality and assessments of social conditions. The importance of dilemma structures lies at the core of this section. Third, the authors present psychological foundations and tools, introducing the behavioral approach to ethics, dual process theory, and Haidt’s social intuitionist model to moral judgment, with its emphasis on the limits of reason for moral judgment. Moreover, the relevance of bounded ethicality in individuals and organizations for business ethics is outlined.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document