Reference range and variability of Laser-Doppler-Fluxmetry

2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 347-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Mrowietz ◽  
R.P. Franke ◽  
G. Pindur ◽  
U. Wolf ◽  
F. Jung
Keyword(s):  
Reference Range ◽  
Laser Doppler ◽  
Laser Doppler Fluxmetry

The NO release test as a functional reference standard for laser Doppler fluxmetry in cutaneous microangiology

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Wohlrab ◽  
Ramona Körting ◽  
Peter Helmbold ◽  
Wolfgang Ch. Marsch
Keyword(s):  
Laser Doppler ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
Laser Doppler Fluxmetry ◽  
Release Test ◽  
No Release

Evaluation of Laser-Doppler-Fluxmetry for the diagnosis of microcirculatory disorders

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Mrowietz ◽  
R.P. Franke ◽  
G. Pindur ◽  
R. Sternitzky ◽  
F. Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Doppler ◽  
Laser Doppler Fluxmetry ◽  
Microcirculatory Disorders

Comparison of laser speckle contrast imaging and laser-Doppler fluxmetry in boys and men

2020 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 103927
Author(s):  
Gary J. Hodges ◽  
Panagiota Klentrou ◽  
Stephen S. Cheung ◽  
Bareket Falk
Keyword(s):  
Laser Speckle ◽  
Laser Doppler ◽  
Contrast Imaging ◽  
Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging ◽  
Speckle Contrast ◽  
Laser Doppler Fluxmetry

The Clinical Study of Detecting the Endodontic Vitality Clinical Reference Range of Anterior Teeth in Children Used By Laser Doppler Flowmetry

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuang Yang ◽  
Feifei Guo ◽  
Zhifei Zhou ◽  
Zeming Hui ◽  
Zirui Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Doppler Flowmetry ◽  
Reference Range ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Laser Doppler ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
Healthy Children ◽  
Doppler Flowmetry ◽  
Tooth Position ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Aim: To measure the pulpal blood flow (PBF) of the upper incisors using the laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) and to calculate the endodontic vitality clinical reference range using PBF as an indicator in the healthy children. To clarify the factors that might interfere the detection and interpretation of the results. Methods: Seven to twelve-year-old school-age children were recruited randomly. The basic characteristics of the subjects are described in terms of age and gender. The mean, standard deviation, and reference range of the subjects’ PBF values are described based on their age, sex, and tooth position. Multi-factor analysis of variance was implemented, mainly including age, gender, and tooth position. Results: 1) The clinical reference range of the anterior teeth PBF in children of different ages was preliminary defined that was approximately among the range of 7-14. 2). A statistically significant correlation between PBF and age in school-aged children (P < 0.05) was detected and no statistical significance between genders (P > 0.05) was detected. The PBF detection value of lateral incisors was higher than that of central incisors, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The determination of the range of clinical reference of anterior teeth PBF in children by LDF could provide a good theoretical basis and reference basis for further promotion of its application.

Laser Doppler Fluxmetry and the Larynx

2004 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. P200-P201
Author(s):  
Antony Jacob ◽  
Martin A Birchall ◽  
Jeremy Davis
Keyword(s):  
Laser Doppler ◽  
Laser Doppler Fluxmetry
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document