Dynamical control of computations using the finite differences method to solve fuzzy boundary value problem

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 1785-1796
Author(s):  
Hasan Barzegar Kelishami ◽  
Mohammad Ali Fariborzi Araghi ◽  
Tofigh Allahviranloo
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hülya Gültekin Çitil

AbstractIn this paper is studied a fuzzy Sturm-Liouville problem with the eigenvalue parameter in the boundary condition. Important notes are given for the problem. Integral equations are found of the problem.


2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 2725-2739
Author(s):  
S. Tudu ◽  
S.P. Mondal ◽  
A. Ahmadian ◽  
A.K. Mahmood ◽  
S. Salahshour ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ali Fareed Jameel ◽  
Hafed H Saleh ◽  
Amirah Azmi ◽  
Abedel-Karrem Alomari ◽  
Nidal Ratib Anakira ◽  
...  

This paper aims to solve the nonlinear two-point fuzzy boundary value problem (TPFBVP) using approximate analytical methods. Most fuzzy boundary value problems cannot be solved exactly or analytically. Even if the analytical solutions exist, they may be challenging to evaluate. Therefore, approximate analytical methods may be necessary to consider the solution. Hence, there is a need to formulate new, efficient, more accurate techniques. This is the focus of this study: two approximate analytical methods-homotopy perturbation method (HPM) and the variational iteration method (VIM) is proposed. Fuzzy set theory properties are presented to formulate these methods from crisp domain to fuzzy domain to find approximate solutions of nonlinear TPFBVP. The presented algorithms can express the solution as a convergent series form. A numerical comparison of the mean errors is made between the HPM and VIM. The results show that these methods are reliable and robust. However, the comparison reveals that VIM convergence is quicker and offers a swifter approach over HPM. Hence, VIM is considered a more efficient approach for nonlinear TPFBVPs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document