Robust consensus models based on minimum cost with an application to marketing plan

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 5655-5668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yefan Han ◽  
Shaojian Qu ◽  
Zhong Wu ◽  
Ripeng Huang
2021 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 77-96
Author(s):  
Huanhuan Li ◽  
Ying Ji ◽  
Zaiwu Gong ◽  
Shaojian Qu

Author(s):  
Guiqing Zhang ◽  
Yucheng Dong ◽  
Yinfeng Xu ◽  
Hongyi Li

2015 ◽  
Vol 240 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaiwu Gong ◽  
Huanhuan Zhang ◽  
Jeffrey Forrest ◽  
Lianshui Li ◽  
Xiaoxia Xu

2017 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 149-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning Zhang ◽  
Zaiwu Gong ◽  
Francisco Chiclana

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Huanhuan Li ◽  
Ying Ji ◽  
Shaojian Qu

Decision-makers usually have a variety of unsure situations in the environment of group decision-making. In this paper, we resolve this difficulty by constructing two-stage stochastic integrated adjustment deviations and consensus models (iADCMs). By introducing the minimum cost consensus models (MCCMs) with costs direction constraints and stochastic programming, we develop three types of iADCMs with an uncertainty of asymmetric costs and initial opinions. The factors of directional constraints, compromise limits and free adjustment thresholds previously thought to affect consensus separately are considered in the proposed models. Different from the previous consensus models, the resulting iADCMs are solved by designing an appropriate L-shaped algorithm. On the application in the negotiations on Grains to Green Programs (GTGP) in China, the proposed models are demonstrated to be more robust. The proposed iADCMs are compared to the MCCMs in an asymmetric costs context. The contrasting outcomes show that the two-stage stochastic iADCMs with no-cost threshold have the smallest total costs. Moreover, based on the case study, we give a sensitivity analysis of the uncertainty of asymmetric adjustment cost. Finally, conclusion and future research prospects are provided.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Jinpeng Wei ◽  
Shaojian Qu ◽  
Shan Jiang ◽  
Can Feng ◽  
Yuting Xu ◽  
...  

Individual opinion is one of the vital factors influencing the consensus in group decision-making, and is often uncertain. The previous studies mostly used probability distribution, interval distribution or uncertainty distribution function to describe the uncertainty of individual opinions. However, this requires an accurate understanding of the individual opinions distribution, which is often difficult to satisfy in real life. In order to overcome this shortcoming, this paper uses a robust optimization method to construct three uncertain sets to better characterize the uncertainty of individual initial opinions. In addition, we used three different aggregation operators to obtain collective opinions instead of using fixed values. Furthermore, we applied the numerical simulations on flood disaster assessment in south China so as to evaluate the robustness of the solutions obtained by the robust consensus models that we proposed. The results showed that the proposed models are more robust than the previous models. Finally, the sensitivity analysis of uncertain parameters was discussed and compared, and the characteristics of the proposed models were revealed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document