scholarly journals Generating Enriched Synthetic German Hospital Claims Data – A Use Case Driven Approach

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Helfer ◽  
Michéle Kümmel ◽  
Franziska Bathelt ◽  
Martin Sedlmayr
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Claims Data ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Patient Data ◽  
German Hospital ◽  
Data Extract ◽  
Mixed Approach

Clinical data and above all individual patient data are highly sensitive. All the more it is important to protect these critical information while analyzing and exploring their specifics for further research. However, in order to enable students and other researchers to develop decision support systems and to use modern data analysis methods such as intelligent pattern recognition, the provision of clinical data is essential. In order to allow this while completely protecting the privacy of a patient, we present a mixed approach to generate semantically and clinically realistic data: (1) We use available synthetic data, extract information on patient visits and diagnoses and adapt them to the encoding systems of German claims data; (2) based on a statistical analysis of real German hospital data, we identify distributions of procedures, laboratory data and other measurements and transfer them to the synthetic patient’s visits and diagnoses in a semi-automated way. This enabled us to provide students a data set that is as semantically and clinically realistic as possible to apply patient-level prediction algorithms within the development of clinical decision support systems without putting patient data at any risk.

scholarly journals Diagnosis of Rare Diseases: a scoping review of clinical decision support systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jannik Schaaf ◽  
Martin Sedlmayr ◽  
Johanna Schaefer ◽  
Holger Storf
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Data Integration ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Rare Diseases ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision

Abstract Background Rare Diseases (RDs), which are defined as diseases affecting no more than 5 out of 10,000 people, are often severe, chronic and life-threatening. A main problem is the delay in diagnosing RDs. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) for RDs are software systems to support clinicians in the diagnosis of patients with RDs. Due to their clinical importance, we conducted a scoping review to determine which CDSSs are available to support the diagnosis of RDs patients, whether the CDSSs are available to be used by clinicians and which functionalities and data are used to provide decision support. Methods We searched PubMed for CDSSs in RDs published between December 16, 2008 and December 16, 2018. Only English articles, original peer reviewed journals and conference papers describing a clinical prototype or a routine use of CDSSs were included. For data charting, we used the data items “Objective and background of the publication/project”, “System or project name”, “Functionality”, “Type of clinical data”, “Rare Diseases covered”, “Development status”, “System availability”, “Data entry and integration”, “Last software update” and “Clinical usage”. Results The search identified 636 articles. After title and abstracting screening, as well as assessing the eligibility criteria for full-text screening, 22 articles describing 19 different CDSSs were identified. Three types of CDSSs were classified: “Analysis or comparison of genetic and phenotypic data,” “machine learning” and “information retrieval”. Twelve of nineteen CDSSs use phenotypic and genetic data, followed by clinical data, literature databases and patient questionnaires. Fourteen of nineteen CDSSs are fully developed systems and therefore publicly available. Data can be entered or uploaded manually in six CDSSs, whereas for four CDSSs no information for data integration was available. Only seven CDSSs allow further ways of data integration. thirteen CDSS do not provide information about clinical usage. Conclusions Different CDSS for various purposes are available, yet clinicians have to determine which is best for their patient. To allow a more precise usage, future research has to focus on CDSSs RDs data integration, clinical usage and updating clinical knowledge. It remains interesting which of the CDSSs will be used and maintained in the future.

Decision Support Based on Laboratory Data

1988 ◽  
Vol 27 (04) ◽  
pp. 187-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rory R. O’Moore
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Decision Aids ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Ongoing Research ◽  
Medical Decision Support ◽  
Medical Decision Support Systems ◽  
High Level

SummaryMedical decision support systems dealing with multiple diseases are presently in a phase of development or revision and, in the immediate future, are likely to be utilized only as part of ongoing research projects or in the field of medical education. Those decision support systems (DSS) which are in routine use have one major factor in common. They are applied in a single narrow domain or series of overlapping narrow domains. Blois and Wagner predicted this, suggesting that computer-based medical decision aids were inherently limited in their ability to assist clinicians in reaching decisions about undifferentiated patients, i. e., those for whom an initial high level general classification had not already been made. To be useful, the domain should be narrowed by the clinical acumen of the physician. A thoughtful working diagnosis on a laboratory request form provides a good example of this process.

Assigning Value to Clinical Information – A Major Limiting Factor in the Implementation of Decision-Support Systems

1996 ◽  
Vol 35 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. T. de Dombal
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Major Difficulty ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Computer Aided Decision

AbstractThis paper deals with a major difficulty and potential limiting factor in present-day decision support - that of assigning precise value to an item (or group of items) of clinical information. Historical determinist descriptive thinking has been challenged by current concepts of uncertainty and probability, but neither view is adequate. Four equations are proposed outlining factors which affect the value of clinical information, which explain some previously puzzling observations concerning decision support. It is suggested that without accommodation of these concepts, computer-aided decision support cannot progress further, but if they can be accommodated in future programs, the implications may be profound.

Architectures for Architects

1993 ◽  
Vol 32 (01) ◽  
pp. 12-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Musen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Design And Development

Abstract:Response to Heathfield HA, Wyatt J. Philosophies for the design and development of clinical decision-support systems. Meth Inform Med 1993; 32: 1-8.

Characterizing Decision Support Telemedicine Systems

2006 ◽  
Vol 45 (05) ◽  
pp. 523-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Abu-Hanna ◽  
B. Nannings
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Problem Dimension ◽  
Process Dimension

Summary Objectives: Decision Support Telemedicine Systems (DSTS) are at the intersection of two disciplines: telemedicine and clinical decision support systems (CDSS). The objective of this paper is to provide a set of characterizing properties for DSTSs. This characterizing property set (CPS) can be used for typing, classifying and clustering DSTSs. Methods: We performed a systematic keyword-based literature search to identify candidate-characterizing properties. We selected a subset of candidates and refined them by assessing their potential in order to obtain the CPS. Results: The CPS consists of 14 properties, which can be used for the uniform description and typing of applications of DSTSs. The properties are grouped in three categories that we refer to as the problem dimension, process dimension, and system dimension. We provide CPS instantiations for three prototypical applications. Conclusions: The CPS includes important properties for typing DSTSs, focusing on aspects of communication for the telemedicine part and on aspects of decisionmaking for the CDSS part. The CPS provides users with tools for uniformly describing DSTSs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document