scholarly journals FENOMENA KEJAHATAN CARDING BERDASARKAN DALAM HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-124
Author(s):  
Raden dimas ari wibowo Dimas ◽  
Vivi Arfiani Siregar
Keyword(s):  

Hukum yang salah satu fungsinya menjamin kelancaran proses pembangunan nasionalsekaligus mengamankan hasil-hasil yang telah dicapai harus dapat melindungi hak parapemakai jasa internet sekaligus menindak tegas para pelaku cyber crime. Maka, pentingbagi pemerintah untuk memberlakukan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentangPerubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan TransaksiElektronik, yang melakukan pengawasan memblokir situs-situs fraud, dan merancangsistem yang baik untuk melindungi masyarakat dari ancaman cyber crime. Dalammelakukan penulisan, memerlukan adanya masalah pokok sebagai perincian pembahasanberupa pengaturan kejahatan carding dalam hukum pidana Indonesia dan upaya hukumdalam penanggulangan terhadap kejahatan carding Di Indonesia. Dilihat dari jenisnya,penelitian hukum ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptifanalisis dari hasil penelitian ini diharapkan diperoleh data yang menggambarkan secaramenyeluruh, jelas dan sistematis. Dalam kaitannya dengan tindak pidana kejahatan cardingdi Indonesia, sanksi yang di tetapkan terhadap terdakwa didasarkan pada Undang-UndangITE sebagai lex specialis. KUHP sebagai lex generais, tergantung pada penilaian hakimterhadap fakta persidangan dan alat bukti yang dihadirkan. Peningkatan upaya pencegahandini terhadap kemungkinan terjadinya potensi suatu gangguan keamanan dan ketertibanumum serta pelayanan masyarakat meliputi kegiatan penyuluhan hukum seperti melakukanseminar kesadaran hukum di masyarakat, patroli atau razia di tempattempat tertentu yangterindikasi adanya kejahatan carding, dan mengadakan koordinasi dengan instansi terkaitdan masyarakat dengan tujuan memperdayakan

Author(s):  
Juveriya Afreen

Abstract-- With increase in complexity of data, security, it is difficult for the individuals to prevent the offence. Thus, by using any automation or software it’s not possible by only using huge fixed algorithms to overcome this. Thus, we need to look for something which is robust and feasible enough. Hence AI plays an epitome role to defense such violations. In this paper we basically look how human reasoning along with AI can be applied to uplift cyber security.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shipra Varshney ◽  
Dheeraj Munjal ◽  
Ipsita Jash ◽  
Orijit Bhattacharya ◽  
Shagun Saboo
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Anupam Bansal

“Cyber crime” has been used to describe a wide range of offences, including offences against computer data and systems (such as “Hacking”), computer related forgery and fraud (such as “phishing”), content offences (such as disseminating child pornography), and copyright offences (such as the dissemination of pirated content). The word “Cyber Crime” has been derived from the words “Cybernetic” which means the science of communication and automatic control systems in both machines and living things.


2021 ◽  
pp. 000486582110039
Author(s):  
Benoît Dupont ◽  
Chad Whelan

‘Cybercrime’ is an umbrella concept used by criminologists to refer to traditional crimes that are enhanced via the use of networked technologies (i.e. cyber-enabled crimes) and newer forms of crime that would not exist without networked technologies (i.e. cyber-dependent crimes). Cybersecurity is similarly a very broad concept and diverse field of practice. For computer scientists, the term ‘cybersecurity’ typically refers to policies, processes and practices undertaken to protect data, networks and systems from unauthorised access. Cybersecurity is used in subnational, national and transnational contexts to capture an increasingly diverse array of threats. Increasingly, cybercrimes are presented as threats to cybersecurity, which explains why national security institutions are gradually becoming involved in cybercrime control and prevention activities. This paper argues that the fields of cyber-criminology and cybersecurity, which are segregated at the moment, are in much need of greater engagement and cross-fertilisation. We draw on concepts of ‘high’ and ‘low’ policing ( Brodeur, 2010 ) to suggest it would be useful to consider ‘crime’ and ‘security’ on the same continuum. This continuum has cybercrime at one end and cybersecurity at the other, with crime being more the domain of ‘low’ policing while security, as conceptualised in the context of specific cybersecurity projects, falls under the responsibility of ‘high’ policing institutions. This unifying approach helps us to explore the fuzzy relationship between cyber- crime and cyber- security and to call for more fruitful alliances between cybercrime and cybersecurity researchers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document