scholarly journals The Relation Between easyCBM and Smarter Balanced Reading and Mathematics Assessments

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-35
Author(s):  
Julie Alonzo

This study investigated the relation be- tween the easyCBM Benchmark Assessments in both mathematics and reading and the Smarter Balanced assessment, widely adopted across the United States. Data for the study were obtained from a convenience sample of approximately 1,000 students per grade in grades 3-8 provided by two school districts in the Pa- cific Northwest. Results indicate that the easyCBM CCSS math assessments are a strong predictor of the Smarter Balanced total math score, with correlations ranging from .69 to .84 across grades and seasonal benchmarks. Linear regression analyses indicate that the different easyCBM CCSS math measures account for 68% to 77% of the variance in Smarter Balanced total math score. In addition, all of the easyCBM read- ing assessments are significantly related to the Smart- er Balanced English language arts total score, with correlations ranging from .50 to .69 across grades, measure types, and seasonal benchmarks. Linear re- gression analyses indicate that the different easyCBM reading measures account for 50% to 62% of the vari- ance in Smarter Balanced English language arts score.

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-188
Author(s):  
Donna L. Pasternak ◽  
Samantha Caughlan ◽  
Heidi Hallman ◽  
Laura Renzi ◽  
Leslie Rush

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna L. Pasternak ◽  
Samantha Caughlan ◽  
Heidi Hallman ◽  
Laura Renzi ◽  
Leslie Rush

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 70-93
Author(s):  
Matt Seymour

[full article in English]  When teaching, many educators must respond to unruly and disruptive students. While most scholarship on student disruption focuses on classroom management strategies and tactics, few studies consider the nature of the disruption, its ideological significance and the social consequences that follows. Via ethnographic methods and microethnographic discourse analysis, this paper examines the complexity and contradictions of macro- and microstructures as they manifest during a student’s disruption of a classroom discussion of a novel in an 11th and 12th grade English Language Arts class in the United States. Using Bakhtin’s notion of carnival as a theoretical framework, this paper examines the pattern of disruption in the classroom that evoked multiple and contradictory ideologies and both maintained and subverted power structures in the context. Contrary to the belief that classroom disruptions are always challenges to power, they sometimes reinforced power relations on a broader cultural level. This paper urges that research and scholarship embrace complexity and contradiction as inherent in the interactions of people in schools and seeks to rethink how educators view and respond to classroom disruption. It concludes by advocating that embracing complexity and contradiction will better allow teachers and researchers to think through systems of education as a way to effectively and ethically intervene when these structures prove problematic.


1999 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
René Matthews ◽  
Maria Conti Mingrone ◽  
Leah A. Zuidema ◽  
Elizabeth G. Mascia ◽  
Gracie Conway Panousis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document