scholarly journals Expression of Fas Ligand is Higher in Early Stage Cervical Cancer with Lymph Nodes Metastasis

Author(s):  
Yahya Irwanto

Objective: To know whether the expression of Fas Ligand has correlation with incidene of metastasis of pelvic lymph node and lymph-vascular stromal invasion (LVSI). Methods: All patients diagnosed of cervical cancer stage IB or IIA who underwent radical hysterectomy in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Central General Hospital from January 2008 until December 2009 were included in analytic cross sectional study. We tested expression of Fas Ligand in cervical cancer specimen by immunohystochemistry with monoclonal antibody. The expression of Fas Ligand was compared between the group of patients with a positive and negative pelvic lymph node and between LVSI positive and negative. The difference of expression in both group were statistically analized with Chi-square test and the correlation Spearman test. Result: Ninety one patients underwent radical hysterectomy for two years and 43 patients were included in these study. The expression of Fas Ligand in 7 patients (16.3%) were negative and the others were positive, with weak, moderate and strong expression were 4 (9.3%), 27 (62.8%), and 5 (11.6%) respectively. The expression of Fas Ligand was significantly higher in the group of patients with positive pelvic lymph node compared to the group of the patients with negative pelvic lymph node (p=0.007) but there was no significant difference between group of the patients with LVSI positive and negative. With Spearman test, we found that the expression of Fas Ligand had a strong correlation with pelvic lymph nodes metastasis (coeff. correlation=0.519 and p=0.00) and have no correlation with LVSI (coef. corellation=0.112 and p=0.474). Conclusion: These finding suggested that expression of Fas Ligand in cervical cancer patients has a strong correlation with the incidence of pelvic lymph node metastasis and none with LVSI. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 36-4: 194-9] Keywords: cervical cancer, fas ligand, immunohystochemistry, LVSI, pelvic lymph node metastasis

1995 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.L. Bremer ◽  
A.T.M.G. Tiebosch ◽  
H.W.H.M. van der Putten ◽  
J. de Haan ◽  
J.W. Arends

1987 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Noguchi ◽  
Isao Shiozawa ◽  
Yoshikimi Sakai ◽  
Teruyuki Yamazaki ◽  
Toru Fukuta

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunlin Chen ◽  
Hui Duan ◽  
Wenling Zhang ◽  
Hongwei Zhao ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Current opinions on whether surgical patients with cervical cancer should undergo para-aortic lymphadenectomy at the same time are inconsistent. The present study examined differences in survival outcomes with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy in surgical patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.Methods: We retrospectively compared the survival outcomes of 8802 cervical cancer patients with stage IB1-IIA2 (FIGO 2009) from 37 hospitals in mainland China, who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy + pelvic lymphadenectomy (n=8445) or abdominal radical hysterectomy + pelvic lymphadenectomy + para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n=357).Results: Among the 8802 patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer, 1618 (18.38%) patients had postoperative pelvic lymph node metastasis, and 37 (10.36%) patients had para-aortic lymph node metastasis. When pelvic lymph node metastasized, the para-aortic lymph node simultaneous metastasis rate was 30.00% (36/120). The risk of isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis was 0.42% (1/237). There were no significant differences in the survival outcomes between the para-aortic lymph node unresected and resected groups. No differences in the survival outcomes were found before or after matching between the two groups regardless of pelvic lymph node negativity/positivity. Conclusion: Para-aortic lymphadenectomy did not improve 5-year survival outcomes in surgical patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer. Therefore, when pelvic lymph node metastasis is negative, the risk of isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis is very low, and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not recommended. When pelvic lymph node metastasis is positive, para-aortic lymphadenectomy should be carefully selected because of the high risk of this procedure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document