Quale learning per il XXI secolo?

2020 ◽  
pp. 458-483
Author(s):  
Stefano Polenta
Keyword(s):  

Il tema dell'apprendimento è ormai al centro dei sistemi educativi. L'interesse per "come" la mente apprende ha sopravanzato il "cosa" apprende. Di qui l'enfasi sulle "competenze" che dovrebbero mettere in condizione il soggetto non solo di contribuire alla coesione sociale e alla propria crescita personale ma anche, come viene ribadito in molti documenti di importanti organizzazioni e decisori internazionali, allo sviluppo economico e alla crescita dell'occupazione nell'ambito di una learning economy. L'interesse che proviene da questi ambienti per una "nuova pedagogia" che fornisca "competenze2 utili alla crescente competizione nell'ambito del capitalismo cognitivo rischia, tuttavia, di enfatizzare solo la dimensione strumentale dell'apprendimento. In questo modo viene meno quella tensione fra soggettività e universalità che l'epoca della Bildung aveva impresso nel concetto di educazione e della quale oggi si sente un rinnovato bisogno. Il contributo intende affrontare queste tematiche proponendo tre "vertici" (creativo, estetico e etico) che intendono fornire un contributo per arricchire il concetto di apprendimento tenendo sullo sfondo proprio quello di universalità.

The present period is a time of learning laborers and the general public where in we are living has come, to be known as information society. The scholarly interests have outweighed the physical endeavors. Some information laborers work for over 60 hours every week. Subsequently, their own diversions and interests conflict with their work. Life is a pack that contains every one of the strands together and henceforth the need to offset work existence with other related issues.' One must have both love and work in one's life to make it solid. Gone are the days when the need of workers used to be for physical and material needs. With the expanding movement of the economy towards learning economy, the significance and nature of work life has experienced an exceptional change.


Author(s):  
Joseph E. Stiglitz ◽  
Bruce C. Greenwald
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (260) ◽  
pp. 61-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marie Guerrettaz

Abstract This study on Yucatec Maya language planning analyzes the linguistic standardization process over a six-year period. The primary research site was the programa, a mandatory Yucatec Maya course for 1,600 Indigenous Education teachers in Mexico. Alongside this acquisition planning effort, other government agencies simultaneously produced an official standard Maya. Programa administrators who oppose official standardization made their own model of Maya in widely distributed government textbooks. Neither model was the main target of programa language teaching; the Maya of classrooms is characterized by vast variation. Although the government promulgated an official standard in 2014, standardization of Maya has not been attained. The difficulties of creating a popular standard by and for Indigenous language speakers are analyzed. Social networks upholding different models of Maya are examined through an economy of language planning framework that views language as social capital and integrates knowledge and learning economy concepts. This research presents the notion of social-linguistic orders to understand how different models of a language coexist and/or compete in a language planning endeavor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document