Il ciclo della violenza: maltrattamento familiare, bullismo e dating aggression psicologico

2014 ◽  
pp. 29-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ersilia Menesini ◽  
Annalaura Nocentini ◽  
Benedetta Emanuela Palladino ◽  
Sara Pini
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 632-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren K. Whiteside ◽  
Maureen A. Walton ◽  
Rachel Stanley ◽  
Stella M. Resko ◽  
Steve T. Chermack ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 088626052094567
Author(s):  
Kathryn M. Bell ◽  
Leanne Howard ◽  
Tara L. Cornelius

The dependency-possessiveness model proposes that individuals who are highly dependent on their intimate partner and fear partner abandonment, particularly among those with emotion dysregulation problems, may be at heightened risk for intimate partner aggression (IPA) perpetration. Despite prior research establishing a link between relationship dependency and male IPA perpetration, it is unknown whether this association extends to female-perpetrated aggression, occurs in dating relationships, and is moderated by emotion dysregulation. Thus, the purpose of the current study was to investigate the association between relationship dependency and female-perpetrated dating aggression and determine if emotion dysregulation moderated this hypothesized relationship. Female undergraduate students ( N = 119) completed measures assessing relationship dependency, emotion dysregulation, and female-perpetrated physical and psychological dating aggression as part of a larger study investigating the context of dating aggression episodes. Anxious attachment was significantly correlated with female-perpetrated psychological and physical dating aggression. Regression analyses indicated a significant interaction between the Spouse-Specific Dependency Scale [SSDS] Anxious Attachment subscale and emotion dysregulation predicting female-perpetrated physical dating aggression, suggesting moderation. There was a positive association between anxious attachment relationship dependency and female-perpetrated physical dating aggression at high levels of emotion dysregulation. A significant interaction was also found between the SSDS Emotional Dependency subscale and emotion dysregulation predicting female-perpetrated physical dating aggression, such that among those with low scores in emotion dysregulation, there was a positive relationship between emotional dependency and female-perpetrated physical dating aggression. Findings suggest that the ability to regulate emotions may play an important role in the association between relationship dependency and female-perpetrated dating aggression.


2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Honore M. Hughes ◽  
Carrie E. Massura ◽  
Onyinyechi V. Anukem ◽  
Jacquelyn S. Cattage

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 147470491984745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann H. Farrell ◽  
Tracy Vaillancourt

Adolescent bullying perpetration has previously been associated with dating benefits and costs in the short- and long-term, yet it is unclear how early temperament traits facilitate these associations. Therefore, the developmental pathways from temperament in early adolescence to bullying perpetration in middle adolescence and to dating outcomes in late adolescence were examined. Participants included 463 individuals who completed self-report measures on temperament traits at age 12, bullying perpetration at age 14, dating outcomes at age 19, and were in a romantic relationship at age 19. Findings from a path analysis revealed that an early adolescent temperament trait reflecting difficulty with self-regulation (i.e., lower inhibitory control) was associated with middle adolescent bullying perpetration and bullying perpetration was associated with late adolescent dating benefits (i.e., more dating partners) and costs (i.e., higher dating aggression perpetration). Lower inhibitory control also had significant indirect associations to the late adolescent dating outcomes through middle adolescent bullying perpetration. Findings suggest that although a temperament trait can facilitate adaptive dating outcomes through bullying, it can also come at a cost for romantic relationships. Results highlight the importance of early tailoring of bullying interventions to the self-regulatory difficulties of youth to prevent adverse long-term outcomes and to also recognize the challenges of developing interventions for behavior that can result in benefits.


Partner Abuse ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Cascardi ◽  
Sarah Avery-Leaf

Emerging research on dating aggression in early adolescence suggests that it occurs as early as 6th grade. However, our understanding of dating aggression during this developmental phase remains limited. The primary purpose of the current study was to examine gender differences in various potentially harmful dating behaviors, including physical and psychological dating aggression and victimization as well as jealous, controlling, and monitoring behaviors in a low-income, urban sample of middle school students (N = 3,174). Approximately 40% of youth reported physical dating aggression as a perpetrator or victim. Girls endorsed all forms of physical aggression at a higher rate than boys with one exception: physical restraint. Regarding physical dating victimization, boys reported higher rates of having been slapped; scratched; or kicked, bit, or hit than did girls. There were no statistically significant gender differences in the frequency of injury to self (6% of boys, 2% of girls) or partner (4% of boys and 5% of girls injured a partner). Although the overall injury rate was low, it was not inconsequential. Regarding other potentially harmful behaviors, girls and boys reported jealous accusations, monitoring and spiteful verbal and nonverbal retaliation with the highest frequency. Although, the vast majority of dating aggression was characterized as “just playing around,” many youth demanded apologies and a substantial minority broke up as a result of dating aggression. Of note, boys were significantly more likely to “do nothing” in response to dating aggression compared to girls. Results highlight the complex, variable meaning of aggression, jealousy, and control in early adolescent dating relationships.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyllis Holditch Niolon ◽  
Gabriel P. Kuperminc ◽  
Joseph P. Allen

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. S100-S100
Author(s):  
Marc Nudel ◽  
Millicent Okereke ◽  
Gabrielle Phillip ◽  
L. Oriana Linares ◽  
Angela Diaz

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 469-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Connolly ◽  
Laura Friedlander ◽  
Debra Pepler ◽  
Wendy Craig ◽  
Lise Laporte

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document