Rappresentazioni e implicazioni sociologiche della deformità in Elephant Man di David Lynch

2020 ◽  
pp. 44-55
Author(s):  
Antonio Rafele ◽  
Guerino Bovalino
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 57-69
Author(s):  
Manuela Partearroyo

This paper would like to analyse two films, The Elephant Man (David Lynch, 1981) and Blow up (Michelangelo Antonioni, 1966) and one classic myth, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, through the very poignant figure of the voyeur. We will investigate this observer of the unnamable focusing on two characters, two eyewitnesses: the scientist who discovers John Merrick and the photographer who becomes obsessed with finding a corpse in an amplified picture. Both these voyeurs seem to be in search of the bewitching and sublime darkness that lies within, a search that in a way is inaugurated by the Promethean doctor at the break of Modernity. The corporeal distance between monster and voyeur creates the unbearable morbidity that devours our gaze. And at that exact point, the figures are reversed and the voyeur becomes the actual monster. Soon enough, we discover that their perspective as voyeurs becomes ours, because through the cinematic experience the spectator becomes witness of the crime, part of the freak show, morbid viewer of the abject. Lynch and Antonioni, together with Shelley’s creature and creator, put the question of the body through a microscope and dare us spectators to look inside, to find the morbidity of truth and the limits of art.


1981 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
Bruce Kawin
Keyword(s):  

1981 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
Bruce Kawin
Keyword(s):  

Adaptation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Amadio

Abstract For many scholars of David Lynch’s work, Dune is considered a spectacular failure, a costly creative misstep on the way to Blue Velvet. While it may not be regarded as one of his signature films, Dune contains enough of Lynch’s creative personality to warrant a critical re-examination. The purpose of this study is to place Dune within the context of his earlier work, namely Eraserhead and The Elephant Man, and to mine it for those tropes with which Lynch has become synonymous: enabling the grotesque, interiority and the unconscious mind, and the relationship between industry and flesh. By the director’s own admission, Dune forced him into an aesthetic middle world, wedging him between the midnight movie and mainstream cinema. Using Thomas Leitch’s theory of adaptation in both an archival and teleological reading of Dune, I demonstrate how Lynch asserts himself in this middle world, how he succeeds in honouring the source material while also meeting his authorial desire to reinvent it, to decouple from the archive and ‘go off the track’.


2019 ◽  
pp. 96-108
Author(s):  
Laura Loguercio Cánepa Correio ◽  
Rogério Ferraraz ◽  
Fabiano Pereira de Souza

Resumo O sound designer americano Alan Splet (1939-1994) participou da produção de 25 filmes. Com o diretor David Lynch, criou efeitos sonoros e ambiências mais livres de vínculos com a verossimilhança. Eles trabalharam juntos no curta-metragem The grandmother (1970) e nos longas-metragens Eraserhead (1977), O homem elefante (The elephant man, 1980), Duna (Dune, 1984) e Veludo azul (Blue velvet, 1986). A forte influência surrealista na filmografia de Lynch estimulou soluções de Splet que se assemelham ao trabalho de som do gênero cinematográfico do horror, o que se reconhece até na recente temporada de 2017 da série de TV Twin Peaks, com direção e sound design do próprio cineasta. Este artigo aborda os procedimentos de edição de som mais usuais na filmografia desse gênero, comparados à edição de efeitos sonoros desse sound designer.


Author(s):  
Christian McCrea

David Lynch's Dune (1984) is the film that science fiction — and the director's most ardent fans — can neither forgive nor forget. Frank Herbert's original 1965 novel built a meticulous universe of dark majesty and justice, as wild-eyed freedom fighters and relentless authoritarians all struggled for control of the desert planet Arrakis and its mystical, life-extending “spice.” After several attempts to produce a film, Italian movie mogul Dino De Laurentiis and his producer daughter Raffaella would enlist David Lynch, whose Eraserhead (1977) and The Elephant Man (1980) had already marked him out as a visionary director. What emerges out of their strange, long process is a deeply unique vision of the distant future; an eclectic bazaar of wood-turned spaceship interiors, spitting tyrants, and dream montages. Lynch's film was “steeped in an ancient primordial nastiness that has nothing to do with the sci-fi film as we currently know it,” as Village Voice critic J. Hoberman put it — only with time becoming a cult classic. This book is the first long-form critical study of the film; it delves into the relationship with the novel, the rapidly changing context of early 1980s science fiction, and takes a close look at Lynch's attempt to breathe sincerity and mysticism into a blockbuster movie format that was shifting radically around him.


1985 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. George Godwin
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document