scholarly journals Performance Evaluation of Equity Funds: 2017-2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-54
Author(s):  
Rivandi Uchok Imanuel Sianipar ◽  
Bambang Mulyana ◽  
Sri Marti Pramudena

Mutual funds are said to perform very well if they can provide a higher rate of return and minimize risk. This study aims to find out if the performance of stock mutual funds has a better performance than the market as a comparison (JCI) using sharpe and jensen methods and to find out if there is a difference in the rating of stock mutual fund performance measurement results between sharpe method and Jensen method.The analysis results using Sharpe method and Jensen method show that 30 mutual funds have a good performance where the performance value of stock mutual funds from sharpe and jensen method is above the average market value (JCI). The result of Sharpe method in 2017 shows that the best performing stock mutual fund is Batavia Stock Fund Optimal Stock Fund. In 2018 and 2019, the best performance was the Sucorivest Maxi Fund, while the result of Jensen's method in 2017, the best performing stock mutual fund was the Sucorivest Maxi Fund. In 2018, it showed the best performance, namely Trim Kapital Equity Fund. The Bahana Trailblazer Fund occupied the highest performance value in 2019. However, each equity fund will experience a change in its rating every year. For the best mutual funds in this research year.

Equity ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Clara Bella ◽  
Yul Tito Permadhy

This study aims to determine the comparison of stock mutual fund performance using sharpe method and treynor method. The research method used in this research is descriptive method with quantitative approach. The object of this study using all mutual fund shares listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2013-2016. The technique of determining the sample using purposive sampling method so that 66 mutual funds were chosen as research sample. The results of this study explain that there are differences in the results of the performance of stock mutual funds using sharpe method and treynor method on mutual fund shares listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) where each performance value fluctuates in the period 20132016. The results show that only a few stock mutual funds are above market performance by using sharpe method and treynor method during the period 2013-2016. The results show that only one stock mutual fund that has consistent performance above market performance during the period 2013-2016 using the sharpe method of equity fund Sam Equity Fund.


2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (02) ◽  
pp. 399-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
KEYI ZHANG ◽  
RAMAZAN GENÇAY

We propose a new determinant of mutual fund performance persistence. We argue that different funds have different abilities to generate persistent performance and that such heterogeneity across funds can be explained by fund manager access to market information. To justify this hypothesis, we construct a network of mutual funds based on the commonality of their stock holdings and use network features to characterize how well a fund acquires and utilizes market information. Based on a sample of U.S. equity funds from 2001 to 2014, we find that a mutual fund with more complete information is more likely to possess momentum in performance.


Author(s):  
Muhammad Helmi ◽  
Jumali Jumali

Mutual funds are investment facilities that are used to raise funds from the investor community for further investment in securities portfolios by investment managers, and subsequently invested in stocks, bonds, time deposits, money market, and so on. Mutual fund performance is influenced by the determining factors of whether a mutual fund performs well or poorly, the mutual fund performance factor, namely the first is the age / age of the mutual fund (Fund Age), the second is the comparison between operating costs in one year and the average net asset value in one year (Expense Ratio) and the third is Net Asset Value (NAV). The formulation of the problems in this research are (1) How is the development of the age of equity funds in Mandiri Investasi for the 2014-2019 period? (2) How is the development of the stock mutual fund expense ratio at the Mandiri Investasi period of 2014-2019? net assets (NAV) of equity mutual funds performance at Mandiri Investasi for the 2014-2019 period. This study aims to determine the development of mutual funds age, expense ratio and net asset value (NAV) of the performance of Mandiri Investa Attractive (MITRA) equity funds in Mandiri Investasi for the period 2014-2019. The objects examined in this study are variables in the form of mutual funds age, expense ratio, and mutual fund performance (NAV). Methods of data analysis in this study using descriptive analysis methods. The results of the research conducted were the age development of Mandiri Investa Attraktf (MITRA) equity funds at the Mandiri Investasi company, which experienced an increase in age in 2014-2019. Expense ratio development in 2014-2019 has decreased. And in the development of equity mutual funds performance, namely the net asset value (NAV) in 2014-2019 experienced fluctuations.


Equity ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Clara Bella ◽  
Yul Tito Permadhy

This study aims to determine the comparison of stock mutual fund performance using sharpe method and treynor method. The research method used in this research is descriptive method with quantitative approach. The object of this study using all mutual fund shares listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2013-2016. The technique of determining the sample using purposive sampling method so that 66 mutual funds were chosen as research sample. The results of this study explain that there are differences in the results of the performance of stock mutual funds using sharpe method and treynor method on mutual fund shares listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) where each performance value fluctuates in the period 20132016. The results show that only a few stock mutual funds are above market performance by using sharpe method and treynor method during the period 2013-2016. The results show that only one stock mutual fund that has consistent performance above market performance during the period 2013-2016 using the sharpe method of equity fund Sam Equity Fund.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Mohammad Nur Rianto Al Arif ◽  
Aulia Saifullah

<p><em>This study aims to analyze determinant performance of Islamic equity funds and compare the performance of Indonesian Islamic equity funds with Malaysian Islamic equity funds period 2017-2019. Factors that are thought to affect the performance of mutual funds are past performance and inflation. Mutual fund performance itself is measured using the Sharpe Index. This study uses secondary data and the sample is taken using purposive sampling. Methods of data analysis using Panel Data Regression. This study indicates that simultaneously the variables Past Performance and Inflation affect the performance of Islamic equity mutual funds in Indonesia and Malaysia.</em></p><em>Furthermore, it partially shows that Past Performance harms the performance of Islamic equity funds, while inflation positively affects the performance of Islamic equity funds. In addition, this study also shows that there is a significant difference between the performance of Indonesian and Malaysian Islamic equity funds. Malaysian Islamic equity funds were superior to Indonesian Islamic equity funds in 2017-2019.</em>


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 89-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed El-Masry ◽  
Dalia A. El-Mosallamy

This study examines the performance of 21 Saudi mutual funds using the CAPM and downside CAPM D-CAPM models over the period 2005-2011. Initially equity fund performance is examined against two benchmarks TASI and the GCCI Islamic index utilizing the traditional beta and CAPM performance evaluation measures. The evaluation is then replicated utilizing the downside beta and other tests of funds’ performance derived from the CAPM in the down side framework. The results indicate that the downside beta could be more relevant in terms of its higher explanatory power than the traditional beta and thus CAPM in the downside framework could be more relevant to report on funds’ performance in this emerging market. After exploring the aggregate performance by forming two fund portfolios; one representing the average Islamic mutual fund and the other is the average conventional fund, to examine the performance of the Islamic mutual funds portfolio compared to its conventional peers and to the overall market, the study finds, on average, Islamic mutual funds in outperform conventional mutual funds and the market portfolio. The study concludes that it is equally important for practitioners in emerging markets, to report performance using both CAPM measures and D-CAPM measures and if differences exist, then the D-CAPM could be the superior measure because of its suitability to the asymmetrical distribution of returns existing in emerging markets in general.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Durán-Santomil ◽  
Luis Otero-González ◽  
Renato Heitor Correia-Domingues ◽  
Juan Carlos Reboredo

Given that sustainable investing constitutes a major force across global financial markets, in 2016 Morningstar began reporting Morningstar Sustainability scores. We used the 2016, 2017 and 2018 scores to study the effects of socially responsible investments (SRI) on European equity fund performance. Sustainability scores impacted positively on performance, which was consistent with the idea that the mutual funds invested in companies with better scores generate better risk-adjusted and not-risk adjusted performance. We also tested the relation on mutual fund flows and risk. The sustainability score in the previous year is significant on the flows, so higher-rated funds receive a larger volume of funds. In terms of risk, the level of sustainability is negatively related to the value at risk (VaR) of the fund, supporting that higher scored mutual funds offer better protection against extreme losses.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-54
Author(s):  
Moch. Amin

The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not there is a difference in mutual fund performance between sharia mutual funds and conventional mutual funds from 2016 to 2018. The data used is secondary data in the form of NVA report data of 34 mutual funds consisting of 16 sharia mutual funds and 18 conventional mutual funds. The data analysis method used is the Jensen Index, Sharpe index, Treynor Index, MM Index, and TT Index methods and uses the t-test to see whether there are differences in mutual fund performance. The results of this study conclude that quantitatively there is no difference in mutual fund performance between sharia mutual funds and conventional mutual funds. Likewise, the statistical test with the t-test shows that there is no difference in performance in terms of the Jensen Index, Sharpe index, Treynor Index, MM Index, and TT Index.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document