Linguistic legacies of British and Portuguese (de)colonization in Africa: (un)successful common bonds?

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-31
Author(s):  
Rita Amorim ◽  
◽  
Raquel Baltazar ◽  
Isabel Soares ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Soft Power ◽  
Educational Policies ◽  
Global Order ◽  
Territorial Expansion ◽  
The United Kingdom

The United Kingdom and Portugal share a past of territorial expansion in multilingual Africa, a continent with great cultural and linguistic variety. The linguistic and educational policies implemented during colonization and decolonization prevail because of the economic and financial interdependence generated by the present global order. The Commonwealth and the CPLP are also, partly, responsible for sustaining distinctive relationships with former African colonies, which have led to the promotion of language as a form of soft power. This is a comparative study analyzing the Anglo- and Portuguese cultural and linguistic spheres in Africa. Conclusions reveal an undesirable gap between official policies and linguistic realities, which can only be understood through paradox, the best-defining characteristic of English and Portuguese linguistic legacies in Africa.

THE CONFRONTATION OF THE PARTIES TO THE SEPARATIST CONFLICT BY MEANS OF «SOFT POWER» (ON THE EXAMPLE OF CATALONIA AND SCOTLAND)

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 119-132
Author(s):  
E.A. TYURIN ◽  
◽  
E.N. SAVINOVA ◽  
О.V. PEREVERZEVA ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
International Relations ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Soft Power ◽  
National Level ◽  
Power Characteristic ◽  
Main Research ◽  
Power Resources ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Legal Grounds

The article attempts to apply the concept of «soft power», characteristic of international relations, to analyze the struggle of participants in separatist conflicts at the national level. The purpose of the study is to consider the «soft power» resources and tools of each of the parties to the conflict between Catalonia and Spain and the conflict between Scotland and the United Kingdom. The main research methods are general logical, institutional and comparative. It is concluded that in the countries under consideration, in the conditions of the manifestation of separatism, the «soft power» has obvious socio-cultural, political, institutional and legal grounds. According to the authors, despite the specifics of the «soft power» confrontation, in each of the cases considered, culture in its various manifestations, image strategies of the parties to the conflict, as well as the institution of the monarchy are crucial.

Bioethics after Brexit: An opportunity to rationalize bioethics governance in the United Kingdom

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 135-156
Author(s):  
Jonathan Montgomery
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Soft Power ◽  
European Region ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
European Institutions ◽  
Strategic Approach ◽  
European Values ◽  
Relationship Of

This article considers the shape of bioethics governance in Europe, noting the interplay between the institutions and laws of the Union and those of the Council of Europe. It reviews the structures of UK bioethics governance and identifies weaknesses that Brexit provides an opportunity to address. It notes the ambiguous relationship of UK bioethicists with European institutions and discusses the importance of soft power. It explores what the United Kingdom should do to maintain its influence. It advocates, first, improved coordination of governance organizations within the United Kingdom. Second, a more strategic approach to ‘soft power’ and UK involvement with international organizations, both within the European region and more widely. Finally, it proposes that the United Kingdom become a signatory to the Oviedo Convention in order to consolidate its connections with European values. These steps are suggested as mitigation for the loss of influence that Brexit might otherwise bring.

scholarly journals Postgraduate Supervision in the United Kingdom and Germany: A Comparative Study of Factors Influencing the Supervisory Relationship

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-57
Author(s):  
Omar Feraboli
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Academic Environment ◽  
Supervisory Relationship ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
University Systems ◽  
Phd Supervision ◽  
Personal Reflections ◽  
German Universities

This paper aims to examine and assess the approaches to postgraduate supervision in the United Kingdom (UK) and in Germany; the factors determining the differences between the two approaches and investigating their impact on the PhD supervision relationship. I combine personal reflections and experiences with the existing literature and with indices of performance and level of internationalisation of British and German universities. I examine several aspects and factors that affect the academic environment and hence determine differences across the British and German university systems, which are finally reflected in the approaches to postgraduate supervision.

scholarly journals Default and Termination of Contract: A comparative Study between Indonesia and The United Kingdom

Yuridika ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 469
Author(s):  
Akhmad Budi Cahyono
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Contractual Relationship ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Injured Party ◽  
The Right

Default is something that often occurs in contractual relationship. It can be not perform its obligations in the contract in all or in a part, performing its obligations but not in accordance with was agreed, performing its obligations but not in time, and performing something that is prohibited in the contract. Due to default, the injured party may claim compensation and / or terminate the contract. The problem is, the Indonesian Civil Code does not specify how a contract can be terminated in case of default. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a comparative study in other countries in terms of how a default can terminate the contract. The British which adopt common law tradition where jurisprudence is the main source of law is the right choice for conducting comparative studies. Countries with common law traditions have detailed legal rules based on jurisprudence. As in Indonesia, according to British contract law, defaults also can terminate the contract. However, unlike in Indonesia, according to British contract law, termination due to a default is only allowed in the event that the default is very serious. The very serious forms of default will be elaborated and become a part of the discussion in this paper.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document