28. A Comprehensive Industrial Hygiene Risk Assessment Program

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Chandna
2012 ◽  
Vol 132 (8) ◽  
pp. 747-753
Author(s):  
Takatoshi Shindo ◽  
Hiroji Matsubara ◽  
Tomotaka Suda ◽  
Toru Miki

Author(s):  
Jorge O. Folino ◽  
Claudio M. Marengo ◽  
Susana E. Marchiano ◽  
Mariel Ascazibar

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Younghee Lee ◽  
Jinkyung Kim ◽  
Junghwan Kim ◽  
Jiyong Kim ◽  
Il Moon

Author(s):  
Jae-Young Choi ◽  
Sang-Hoon Byeon

Safety showers and eyewash stations are equipment used for primary washing if their operator is exposed to hazardous chemicals. Therefore, safety showers and eyewash stations should be installed to ensure operator safety in process plants with excessive hazardous chemicals. International guidelines related to safety showers and eyewash stations are introduced in ANSI Z358.1, BS EN 15154, and German DIN 12899-3:2009, but only mechanical specifications regarding safety showers and eyewash stations are suggested. As such, there are currently no engineering guidelines, books, or technical journal papers requiring safety showers or eyewash stations and their efficient deployment. Thus, this study conducted risk assessment from an industrial hygiene perspective, suggesting which process equipment requires a safety shower and eyewash, including their economical and efficient deployment for operator safety. In industry, safety showers and eyewash stations are considered part of the process safety field; this study attempted to contribute to the safety improvement of operators by applying risk assessment of the industrial hygiene field. More studies are needed that contribute to operators’ safety by incorporating industrial hygiene fields for other process safety fields, including safety showers and eyewash stations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 819-835
Author(s):  
Antonio José Carpio ◽  
María de las Nieves González ◽  
Inmaculada Martínez ◽  
María Isabel Prieto

The techniques for preventing risk have traditionally been analyzed on an individual basis, it being highly complex to apply preventive procedures across the board in construction works. This implies the necessary risk assessment based on the common factors of Safety at Work, Industrial Hygiene, Ergonomics and Psychosociology. This work analyzes and classifies the environments which characterize the building process: absolute (initial), documentary, construction, social and life cycle, and identifies the technical-documentary processes associated with each one. Finally, a new risk assessment method adapted to building works is proposed, called “Level of Preventive Action”, by means of a new mathematical formula which encompasses Safety at Work, Industrial Hygiene, Ergonomic and Psychosociological factors. It is based upon the development of the William T. Fine method, adapting it to construction works, with the incorporation of six parameters to explain the degree of correction. It consolidates and connects environment parameters to determine the preventive action level of the construction work, with the objective of establishing the levels of preventive control required to achieve an optimum prevention situation. The results of comparison between the environments in the implementation of the new risk assessment methodology during the construction process in a real building work are shown.


2007 ◽  
Vol 178 (5) ◽  
pp. 1920-1924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veda N. Giri ◽  
Jennifer Beebe-Dimmer ◽  
Mark Buyyounouski ◽  
Andre Konski ◽  
Steven J. Feigenberg ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 803-808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurel A. Snyder ◽  
Dawn B. Wallerstedt ◽  
Lynda L. Lahl ◽  
Michele E. Nehrebecky ◽  
Peter W. Soballe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document