Automatic mud pressure control systems at the bottom of the well

Author(s):  
V.N. Esaulenko ◽  
◽  
V.I. Kantemirov ◽  
V.F. Chikhotkin ◽  
◽  
...  
1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-282
Author(s):  
Ichiro KIMURA ◽  
Toshi TAKAMORI ◽  
Yoshihide YASUDA ◽  
Yoshio MURAO ◽  
Youichi MIZUNO

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abednego Ishaya, Wakili

Abstract As hydrocarbon formation continues, owing to its natural sourcing, technologies have continually emerged on how these hydrocarbons can be effectively produced at a commercial benchmark. Asides its natural drive system, the enhanced oil recovery methods have been one key approach that has been effected towards increasing hydrocarbon's production rate, from its reservoirs. The natural reservoir energy has allowed for about 10% production of original oil in place. And, extending a field's productive life by employing the secondary recovery has further improved production to 20 to 40%, with EOR amounting to about 30 to 60% production. This however, would tell of the impending need towards further developments on increasing upon this production rate. Hence, the approach on using a pneumatic operated assembly with considerations made on onshore wells. This paper seeks to depict a focal on "Pneumatic IOR (Improved Oil Recovery)" as a method to be effected for onshore wells towards improving its productivity. The pneumatic system uses compressed air, contained in a cylinder - through specialized tubing, alongside pressure control systems, that helps regulate the flow and amount of the compressed air; to propel a metallic bar that will act on the reservoir surface. A force of impact, which will induce vibrations inwards, is generated. The mechanical motion of the metal bars for which this compressed air acts upon will provide the travel force, which when it acts on the reservoir surface of interest, will induce geologic stresses. This stresses and vibrations are important constituents in increasing pressure, downhole. Thereby, enabling fluid flow upwards through the wellbore to the surface. And, this will proffer the necessary physics, needed for pressure development downhole, which will be of importance in improving Oil Recovery.


Author(s):  
Chen-Lin Li ◽  
Chiung-Wen Tsai ◽  
Chunkuan Shih ◽  
Jong-Rong Wang ◽  
Su-Chin Chung

This study used RETRAN program to analyze the turbine trip and load rejection transients of Taiwan Power Company Lungmen Nuclear Power Plant’s startup test at 100% power and 100% core flow operating condition. This model includes thermal flow control volumes and junctions, control systems, thermal hydraulic models, safety systems, and 1D kinetics model. In Lungmen RETRAN model, four steam lines are simulated as one line. There are four simulated control systems: pressure control system, water level control system, feedwater control system, and speed control system for reactor internal pumps. The turbine trip event, at above 40% power, triggers the fast open of the bypass valves. Upon the turbine trip, the turbine stop valves close. To minimize steam bypassed to the main condenser, recirculation flow is automatically runback and a SCRRI (selected control rod run in) is initiated to reduce the reactor power. The load rejection event causes the fast opening of the bypass valves. Steam bypass will sufficiently control the pressure, because of their 110% bypass capacity. A SCRRI and RIP runback are also initiated to reduce the reactor power. This study also investigated the sensitivity analysis of turbine bypass flow, runback rate of RIPS and SCRRI to observe how they affect fuel surface heat flux, neutron flux and water level, etc. The results show that turbine bypass flow has larger impacts on dome pressure than RIPS runback rate and SCRRI. This study also indicates that test criteria in turbine trip and load rejection transients are met and Lungmen RETRAN model is performing well and applicable for Lungmen startup test predictions and analyses.


Author(s):  
Z.S. Sukhov ◽  
G.A. Timofeev

This article presents a review of pneumatic, electro-pneumatic and digital systems for automatic pressure control in an airtight cabin and lists the types of aircraft where such systems are installed. Advanced algorithms for controlling the pressure in an airtight cabin are analyzed and literature on this topic is surveyed. The work of a Russian author that describes optimal control based on Pontryagin’s maximum principle is examined. The works of foreign authors on fuzzy PID-controller, L1-adaptive controller and other methods of adaptive pressurization are analyzed and brief results of these works are presented. The performed analysis indicates the need to use new methods and approaches to the synthesis of automatic pressure control systems for various types of aircraft. One of the most promising solutions is the use of adaptive regulators. The relevance of developing a virtual testing environment to reduce the cost of full-scale testing is shown.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document