scholarly journals Private Edge Domination Number of a Graph

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-294
Author(s):  
Kavitha S ◽  
Robinson C. S
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Edge Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Numbers

A set    is said to be a private edge dominating set, if it is an edge dominating set, for every has at least one external private neighbor in . Let  and  denote the minimum and maximum cardinalities, respectively, of a private edge dominating sets in a graph . In this paper we characterize connected graph for which ? q/2 and the graph for some upper bounds. The private edge domination numbers of several classes of graphs are determined.Keywords: Edge domination; Perfect domination; Private domination; Edge irredundant sets.© 2013 JSR Publications. ISSN: 2070-0237 (Print); 2070-0245 (Online). All rights reserved.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v5i2.12024         J. Sci. Res. 5 (2), 283-294 (2013)

scholarly journals The edge-to-edge geodetic domination number of a graph

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 635-658
Author(s):  
J. John ◽  
V. Sujin Flower
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
General Properties ◽  
Geodetic Number ◽  
Geodetic Set ◽  
Positive Integers

Let G = (V, E) be a connected graph with at least three vertices. A set S ⊆ E(G) is called an edge-to-edge geodetic dominating set of G if S is both an edge-to-edge geodetic set of G and an edge dominating set of G. The edge-to-edge geodetic domination number γgee(G) of G is the minimum cardinality of its edge-to-edge geodetic dominating sets. Some general properties satisfied by this concept are studied. Connected graphs of size m with edge-to-edge geodetic domination number 2 or m or m − 1 are characterized. We proved that if G is a connected graph of size m ≥ 4 and Ḡ is also connected, then 4 ≤ γgee(G) + γgee(Ḡ) ≤ 2m − 2. Moreover we characterized graphs for which the lower and the upper bounds are sharp. It is shown that, for every pair of positive integers a, b with 2 ≤ a ≤ b, there exists a connected graph G with gee(G) = a and γgee(G) = b. Also it is shown that, for every pair of positive integers a and b with 2 < a ≤ b, there exists a connected graph G with γe(G) = a and γgee(G) = b, where γe(G) is the edge domination number of G and gee(G) is the edge-to-edge geodetic number of G.

scholarly journals Cost Effective Domination in the Join, Corona and Composition of Graphs

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 978-998
Author(s):  
Ferdinand P. Jamil ◽  
Hearty Nuenay Maglanque
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Minimal Cost ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Maximum Cardinality ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Domination Numbers

Let $G$ be a connected graph. A cost effective dominating set in a graph $G$ is any set $S$ of vertices in $G$ satisfying the condition that each vertex in $S$ is adjacent to at least as many vertices outside $S$ as inside $S$ and every vertex outside $S$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $S$. The minimum cardinality of a cost effective dominating set is the cost effective domination number of $G$. The maximum cardinality of a cost effective dominating set is the upper cost effective domination number of $G$. A cost effective dominating set is said to be minimal if it does not contain a proper subset which is itself a cost effective dominating in $G$. The maximum cardinality of a minimal cost effective dominating set in a graph $G$ is the minimal cost effective domination number of $G$.In this paper, we characterized the cost effective dominating sets in the join, corona and composition of graphs. As direct consequences, we the bounds or the exact cost effective domination numbers, minimal cost effective domination numbers and upper cost effective domination numbers of these graphs were obtained.

The detour domination number of a graph

2017 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 1750006 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. John ◽  
N. Arianayagam
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Order ◽  
Number Formula ◽  
Positive Integers ◽  
Domination Numbers

For a connected graph [Formula: see text], a set [Formula: see text] is called a detour dominating set of [Formula: see text], if [Formula: see text] is a detour set and dominating set of [Formula: see text]. The detour domination number [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is the minimum order of its detour dominating sets and any detour dominating set of order [Formula: see text] is called a [Formula: see text] - set of [Formula: see text]. The detour domination numbers of some standard graphs are determined. Connected graph of order [Formula: see text] with detour domination number [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] is characterized. For positive integers [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text], there exists a connected graph with [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text].

scholarly journals Blast Domination Number of Transformation Graphs of Linear and Circular Graphs

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4S4) ◽  
pp. 93-96
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Connected Dominating Set ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Domination Numbers

A subset S of V of a non-trivial connected graph G is called a Blast dominating set (BD-set), if S is a connected dominating set and the induced sub graph 𝑽 − 𝑺 is triple connected. The minimum cardinality taken over all such Blast Dominating sets is called the Blast Domination Number (BDN) of G and is denoted as, 𝜸𝒄 𝒕𝒄 (𝑮). In this article, let us mull over the generalized transformation graphs 𝑮 𝒂𝒃 and get hold of the analogous lexis of the Blast domination numbers for all the rage, transformation graphs, 𝑮 𝒂𝒃 and their complement graphs, 𝑮 𝒂 𝒃 for linear and circular graphs.

scholarly journals Claw-free graphs with equal 2-domination and domination numbers

Filomat ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 2795-2801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Hansberg ◽  
Bert Randerath ◽  
Lutz Volkmann
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Line Graphs ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Domination Numbers

For a graph G a subset D of the vertex set of G is a k-dominating set if every vertex not in D has at least k neighbors in D. The k-domination number k(G) is the minimum cardinality among the k-dominating sets of G. Note that the 1-domination number 1(G) is the usual domination number (G). Fink and Jacobson showed in 1985 that the inequality ?k(G)?(G)+k?2 is valid for every connected graph G. In this paper, we concentrate on the case k = 2, where k can be equal to ?, and we characterize all claw-free graphs and all line graphs G with ?(G) = ?2(G).

scholarly journals Distance Domination and Distance Irredundance in Graphs

10.37236/953 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Hansberg ◽  
Dirk Meierling ◽  
Lutz Volkmann
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Distance Domination

A set $D\subseteq V$ of vertices is said to be a (connected) distance $k$-dominating set of $G$ if the distance between each vertex $u\in V-D$ and $D$ is at most $k$ (and $D$ induces a connected graph in $G$). The minimum cardinality of a (connected) distance $k$-dominating set in $G$ is the (connected) distance $k$-domination number of $G$, denoted by $\gamma_k(G)$ ($\gamma_k^c(G)$, respectively). The set $D$ is defined to be a total $k$-dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V$ is within distance $k$ from some vertex of $D$ other than itself. The minimum cardinality among all total $k$-dominating sets of $G$ is called the total $k$-domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $\gamma_k^t(G)$. For $x\in X\subseteq V$, if $N^k[x]-N^k[X-x]\neq\emptyset$, the vertex $x$ is said to be $k$-irredundant in $X$. A set $X$ containing only $k$-irredundant vertices is called $k$-irredundant. The $k$-irredundance number of $G$, denoted by $ir_k(G)$, is the minimum cardinality taken over all maximal $k$-irredundant sets of vertices of $G$. In this paper we establish lower bounds for the distance $k$-irredundance number of graphs and trees. More precisely, we prove that ${5k+1\over 2}ir_k(G)\geq \gamma_k^c(G)+2k$ for each connected graph $G$ and $(2k+1)ir_k(T)\geq\gamma_k^c(T)+2k\geq |V|+2k-kn_1(T)$ for each tree $T=(V,E)$ with $n_1(T)$ leaves. A class of examples shows that the latter bound is sharp. The second inequality generalizes a result of Meierling and Volkmann and Cyman, Lemańska and Raczek regarding $\gamma_k$ and the first generalizes a result of Favaron and Kratsch regarding $ir_1$. Furthermore, we shall show that $\gamma_k^c(G)\leq{3k+1\over2}\gamma_k^t(G)-2k$ for each connected graph $G$, thereby generalizing a result of Favaron and Kratsch regarding $k=1$.

Double hop dominating sets in graphs

2020 ◽  
pp. 2150057
Author(s):  
Reynaldo V. Mollejon ◽  
Sergio R. Canoy
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Binary Operations

Let [Formula: see text] be a connected graph of order [Formula: see text]. A subset [Formula: see text] is a double hop dominating set (or a double [Formula: see text]-step dominating set) if [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text], for each [Formula: see text]. The smallest cardinality of a double hop dominating set of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], is the double hop domination number of [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we investigate the concept of double hop dominating sets and study it for graphs resulting from some binary operations.

The minimum eccentric distance sum of trees with given distance k-domination number

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (04) ◽  
pp. 2050052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidan Pei ◽  
Xiangfeng Pan
Keyword(s):  
Positive Integer ◽  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Number Formula ◽  
Simple Connected Graph ◽  
Eccentric Distance ◽  
Distance Formula

Let [Formula: see text] be a positive integer and [Formula: see text] be a simple connected graph. The eccentric distance sum of [Formula: see text] is defined as [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the maximum distance from [Formula: see text] to any other vertex and [Formula: see text] is the sum of all distances from [Formula: see text]. A set [Formula: see text] is a distance [Formula: see text]-dominating set of [Formula: see text] if for every vertex [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] for some vertex [Formula: see text]. The minimum cardinality among all distance [Formula: see text]-dominating sets of [Formula: see text] is called the distance [Formula: see text]-domination number [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text]. In this paper, the trees among all [Formula: see text]-vertex trees with distance [Formula: see text]-domination number [Formula: see text] having the minimal eccentric distance sum are determined.

On the minimum vertex covering transversal dominating sets in graphs and their classification

2017 ◽  
Vol 09 (05) ◽  
pp. 1750069 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Vasanthi ◽  
K. Subramanian
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Vertex Covering ◽  
Number Formula ◽  
Covering Set ◽  
Simple Connected Graph

Let [Formula: see text] be a simple and connected graph. A dominating set [Formula: see text] is said to be a vertex covering transversal dominating set if it intersects every minimum vertex covering set of [Formula: see text]. The vertex covering transversal domination number [Formula: see text] is the minimum cardinality among all vertex covering transversal dominating sets of [Formula: see text]. A vertex covering transversal dominating set of minimum cardinality [Formula: see text] is called a minimum vertex covering transversal dominating set or simply a [Formula: see text]-set. In this paper, we prove some general theorems on the vertex covering transversal domination number of a simple connected graph. We also provide some results about [Formula: see text]-sets and try to classify those sets based on their intersection with the minimum vertex covering sets.

scholarly journals Graphs with Constant Sum of Domination and Inverse Domination Numbers

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Tamizh Chelvam ◽  
T. Asir
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Complete Characterization ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Connected Graphs ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Domination Numbers

A subset D of the vertex set of a graph G, is a dominating set if every vertex in V−D is adjacent to at least one vertex in D. The domination number γ(G) is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G. A subset of V−D, which is also a dominating set of G is called an inverse dominating set of G with respect to D. The inverse domination number γ′(G) is the minimum cardinality of the inverse dominating sets. Domke et al. (2004) characterized connected graphs G with γ(G)+γ′(G)=n, where n is the number of vertices in G. It is the purpose of this paper to give a complete characterization of graphs G with minimum degree at least two and γ(G)+γ′(G)=n−1.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document