scholarly journals Oncology training and education initiatives in low and middle income countries: a scoping review

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safiya Karim ◽  
Zahra Sunderji ◽  
Matthew Jalink ◽  
Sahar Mohamed ◽  
Indranil Mallick ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23004-e23004
Author(s):  
Safiya Karim ◽  
Zahra Sunderji ◽  
Matthew Jalink ◽  
Sahar Mohamed ◽  
Nazik Hammad ◽  
...  

e23004 Background: A large proportion of the global cancer burden occurs in low and middle income countries (LMICs). One of the significant barriers to adequate cancer control is the lack of an adequately trained oncology workforce. Medical education and training initiatives in oncology are necessary to tackle growing cancer incidence and mortality rates. We performed a scoping review of oncology medical education interventions in LMICs to understand the strategies used to train the global oncology workforce. Methods: We searched OVID MEDLINE and EMBASE databases between January 1, 1995 and March 4, 2020 using a standardized scoping review framework. Articles were eligible if they described an oncology medical education intervention within an LMIC with clear outcomes. Articles were classified based on the target population, the level of medical education, form of collaboration with another institution and if there was an e-learning component to the intervention. Results: Of the 806 articles screened, 25 met criteria and were eligible for analysis. The Middle East/Africa was the most common geographic area of the educational initiative (N=14/25). The majority of interventions were targeted towards physicians (n=15/25) and focused on continuing medical education (n=22/25). Twelve articles described the use of e-learning as part of the intervention. Twenty four articles described some form of collaboration, most commonly with an institution from a high-income country. Language barriers, technology, and lack of physical infrastructure and resources in the LMIC were the most common challenges described. The majority of the initiatives were funded through grants or charitable donations. Conclusions: There is a paucity of published interventions of oncology medical education initiatives in LMICs. Continued medical education initiatives and those targeted towards physicians are most common. There is a lack of collaboration between LMICs in these interventions. Further interventions are needed earlier during medical training and for non-physicians. In addition, increased use of e-learning interventions may overcome certain identified challenges. Encouragement of locally funded initiatives as well as scholarly evaluation and publication of these initiatives are important to improve cancer care in LMICs.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Mulimba Were ◽  
SAVERIO STRANGES ◽  
Ishor Sharma ◽  
Juan-Camilo Vargas-Gonzalez ◽  
M. Karen Campbell

Introduction: The majority of the populations in Low-and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) are encountering the double burden of malnutrition (DBM): the coexistence of both undernutrition and overnutrition sequalae. With DBM being a new phenomenon in research, little is known about its etiology, operational definitions and risk factors influencing its manifestation. The proposed scoping review is aimed at mapping literature with regards to the DBM phenomenon among preschool children and women of reproductive age in LMICs who are among the most high-risk groups to encounter DBM. Methods: A comprehensive literature search will be conducted in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS and ProQuest Dissertations & Thesis Global. Additionally, searches in other government and institutional sources (World Health Organization website and university repositories) and forward and backward citation tracking of seminal articles will also be done. Two reviewers will independently conduct title and abstract screening and full text screening. Similarly, data extraction and coding will independently be done by two reviewers. Information extracted from included literature will be analysed qualitatively using thematic analysis approach and reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for this study because the review is based on literature from publicly available sources. The dissemination of our findings will be done through presentations in relevant conferences and publication in a peer-reviewed journal.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nessa Ryan ◽  
Vida Rebello ◽  
Desiree Gutierrez ◽  
Kameko Washburn ◽  
Alvaro Zevallos Barboza ◽  
...  

Background: Stroke is the second leading cause of death globally and an increasing concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) where, due to limited capacity to treat stroke, preventative efforts are critically important. Although some research on evidence-based interventions for stroke prevention in LMIC exists, there remains a significant gap in understanding of their implementation across various contexts in LMIC. Objectives: In this scoping review, our objective was to identify and synthesize the implementation outcomes (using Proctor et al.’s taxonomy, 2011) for stroke prevention interventions, as well as to describe the diverse interventions employed. Methods: Eligible studies were empirical, focused on implementation of stroke prevention programs or policies, and occurred in at least one LMIC. Five databases were searched, including PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for selection and charted data; discrepancies were resolved through discussion with a third reviewer until consensus was reached. Narrative synthesis was used to analyze and interpret the findings. Results: Studies were predominantly focused in Asia, targeting primary or secondary prevention, and facility-based. Interventions were conducted at the level of individual (n=11), system (n=12), or both (n=4). Various implementation outcomes were reported, most commonly cost (n=10), acceptability (n=7), fidelity (n=7), and feasibility (n=6), but also adoption (n=4), penetration (n=3), appropriateness (n=1), and sustainability (n=1). Conclusions: Findings highlight the breadth of evidence-based interventions for stroke prevention available to implement in LMIC settings, including culturally acceptable education interventions, cost-effective medications, and community-based interventions implemented by community health workers. Implementation outcomes remain under-reported, and more rigorous research is needed to better plan and evaluate the implementation of these interventions to prevent stroke.


Vaccine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (30) ◽  
pp. 4652-4663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Harrison ◽  
Nargis Rahimi ◽  
M. Carolina Danovaro-Holliday

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document