scholarly journals Postoperative Changes in Paraspinal Muscle Volume: Comparison between Paramedian Interfascial and Midline Approaches for Lumbar Fusion

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Jae Hyun ◽  
Young Baeg Kim ◽  
Yang Soo Kim ◽  
Seung Won Park ◽  
Taek Kyun Nam ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 867-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Yeol Kim ◽  
Dal Sung Ryu ◽  
Ho Kyu Paik ◽  
Sang Soak Ahn ◽  
Moo Sung Kang ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 1604-1609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Ren ◽  
Søren Eiskjær ◽  
Jon Kaspersen ◽  
Finn Bjarke Christensen ◽  
Sten Rasmussen

Spine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungwook Kang ◽  
Min Cheol Chang ◽  
Hwanjin Kim ◽  
Jaewoong Kim ◽  
Youngjae Jang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Min Cho ◽  
Se-Hoon Kim ◽  
Sung-Kon Ha ◽  
Sang-Dae Kim ◽  
Dong-Jun Lim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdi Ebrahimkhani ◽  
Navid Arjmand ◽  
Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl

AbstractAdjacent segment disorders are prevalent in patients following a spinal fusion surgery. Postoperative alterations in the adjacent segment biomechanics play a role in the etiology of these conditions. While experimental approaches fail to directly quantify spinal loads, previous modeling studies have numerous shortcomings when simulating the complex structures of the spine and the pre/postoperative mechanobiology of the patient. The biomechanical effects of the L4–L5 fusion surgery on muscle forces and adjacent segment kinetics (compression, shear, and moment) were investigated using a validated musculoskeletal model. The model was driven by in vivo kinematics for both preoperative (intact or severely degenerated L4–L5) and postoperative conditions while accounting for muscle atrophies. Results indicated marked changes in the kinetics of adjacent L3–L4 and L5–S1 segments (e.g., by up to 115% and 73% in shear loads and passive moments, respectively) that depended on the preoperative L4–L5 disc condition, postoperative lumbopelvic kinematics and, to a lesser extent, postoperative changes in the L4–L5 segmental lordosis and muscle injuries. Upper adjacent segment was more affected post-fusion than the lower one. While these findings identify risk factors for adjacent segment disorders, they indicate that surgical and postoperative rehabilitation interventions should focus on the preservation/restoration of patient’s normal segmental kinematics.


2020 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. e514-e523
Author(s):  
Young-Seok Lee ◽  
Subum Lee ◽  
Myeong Jin Ko ◽  
Dae-Chul Cho ◽  
Kyoung-Tae Kim

2000 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideyuki SUWA ◽  
Junya HANAKITA ◽  
Noboru OHSHITA ◽  
Kazuo GOTOH ◽  
Norihiro MATSUOKA ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 8-9
Author(s):  
Marjorie Eskay-Auerbach

Abstract The incidence of cervical and lumbar fusion surgery has increased in the past twenty years, and during follow-up some of these patients develop changes at the adjacent segment. Recognizing that adjacent segment degeneration and disease may occur in the future does not alter the rating for a cervical or lumbar fusion at the time the patient's condition is determined to be at maximum medical improvement (MMI). The term adjacent segment degeneration refers to the presence of radiographic findings of degenerative disc disease, including disc space narrowing, instability, and so on at the motion segment above or below a cervical or lumbar fusion. Adjacent segment disease refers to the development of new clinical symptoms that correspond to these changes on imaging. The biomechanics of adjacent segment degeneration have been studied, and, although the exact mechanism is uncertain, genetics may play a role. Findings associated with adjacent segment degeneration include degeneration of the facet joints with hypertrophy and thickening of the ligamentum flavum, disc space collapse, and translation—but the clinical significance of these radiographic degenerative changes remains unclear, particularly in light of the known presence of abnormal findings in asymptomatic patients. Evaluators should not rate an individual in anticipation of the development of changes at the level above a fusion, although such a development is a recognized possibility.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document