Diagnostic value of multiplanar reconstruction in CT recognition of lumbar spinal disorders

1984 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 779
Author(s):  
S K Im ◽  
J H Choi ◽  
C H Kim ◽  
M H Sohn ◽  
K Y Lim ◽  
...  
Radiographics ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 529-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul C. McAfee ◽  
Christopher G. Ullrich ◽  
E. Mark Levinsohn ◽  
Hansen A. Yuan ◽  
Edwin D. Cacayorin ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 191
Author(s):  
Ki Soo Kim ◽  
Yong Soo Choi ◽  
Do Yong Kim ◽  
Yang Min Chung ◽  
In Seok Park ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (24) ◽  
pp. 2885-2892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Atlas ◽  
Richard A. Deyo ◽  
Donald L. Patrick ◽  
Karen Convery ◽  
Robert B. Keller ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (12) ◽  
pp. 914-921
Author(s):  
Yoichi Shimada ◽  
Michio Hongo ◽  
Kazutoshi Hatakeyama ◽  
Motoyuki Watanabe

1998 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. B. Wieslander ◽  
E. D. Rappeport ◽  
G. S. Lausten ◽  
H. S. Thomsen

Purpose: to compare standard MR sagittal and coronal imaging of the knee with the MR technique of finer sagittal imaging and subsequent reconstruction in any plane Material and Methods: Forty-seven patients took part in the study. Two radiologists each made two independent interpretations in every case, based on images of: a) 4-mm sagittal and coronal slices; and b) 1.2-mm sagittal slices with subsequent reconstruction Results: We found no significant difference in diagnostic efficacy between the two MR techniques. the reconstruction in any desired plane involved a potential reduction of 10 min in examination time but an increase of approximately 20 min in postprocessing time Conclusion: the use of multiplanar reconstruction offered no additional diagnostic value and no saving of time


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 686-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Barz ◽  
Markus Melloh ◽  
Lukas Staub ◽  
Christoph Roeder ◽  
Jörn Lange ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 5001
Author(s):  
Hidetomi Terai ◽  
Hiromitsu Toyoda ◽  
Masatoshi Hoshino ◽  
Akinobu Suzuki ◽  
Shinji Takahashi ◽  
...  

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a neurological disorder that causes uncomfortable sensations in the legs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the symptoms of RLS in patients with spinal disorders and the impact of RLS on the clinical outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The records of 278 patients (age range 65–92 years) with spinal disorders who visited our outpatient clinic were reviewed. We used a survey to identify subjects with RLS based on the International RLS Study Group diagnostic criteria. We further recorded patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, sleeping time, mental health condition, and the occurrence of leg cramps. Thirty-two patients (11.5%) met the criteria for RLS. The prevalence of anxiety (46.9% vs. 26.6%, p = 0.023) and leg cramps (90.6% vs. 73.2%, p = 0.030) was higher in patients with RLS than in those without. RLS was present in 12.3% of LSS patients. The visual analog scale score for lower back pain before surgery and at the final follow-up was significantly higher in LSS patients with RLS than in those without. However, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, JOA score improvement ratio, and VAS score for leg numbness were not significantly different between the groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document