Locking Plate in Proximal Tibial Fracture: A Correlation between the Coronal Alignment of Tibia and Joint Screw Angle

Abstract BackgroundGood clinical outcomes for locking plates as an external fixator to treat tibial fractures have been reported. However, external locking plate fixation is still generally rarely performed. This study aimed to compare the stability of external locking plate fixator with that of conventional external fixator for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures, using finite element analysis. MethodsThree models were constructed: (1) external locking plating of proximal tibial fracture with lateral proximal tibial locking plate and 5-mm screws (ELP), (2) conventional external fixation of proximal tibial fracture with an 11-mm rod and 5-mm Schanz screws (EF-11), and (3) conventional external fixation of proximal tibial fracture with a 7-mm rod and 5-mm Schanz screws (EF-7). The stress distribution, displacement at the fracture gap, and stiffness of the three finite element models at 30-, 40-, 50-, and 60-mm plate–rod offset from the lateral surface of the lateral condyle of the tibia were determined. ResultsThe conventional external fixator showed higher stiffness than did the external locking plate fixator. In all models, the stiffness decreased as the distance of the plate–rod from the bone surface increased. The maximum stiffness was 121.06 N/mm in the EF-11 model with 30-mm tibia–rod offset. In the EF-7 model group, the maximum stiffness was 40.00 N/mm in the model with 30-mm tibia–rod offset. In the ELP model group, the maximum stiffness was 35.79 N/mm in the model with 30-mm tibia–plate offsetConclusionsExternal locking plate fixation is more flexible than conventional external fixation, which can influence secondary bone healing. External locking plate fixation requires the placement of the plate as close as possible to the skin, which allow low-profile design, because the increased distance of the plate from bone can be too flexible for bone healing.

Download Full-text

Comparison between external locking plate fixation and conventional external fixation for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a finite element analysis

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research ◽

10.1186/s13018-021-02907-3 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 17 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Dejan Blažević ◽

Janoš Kodvanj ◽

Petra Adamović ◽

Dinko Vidović ◽

Zlatko Trobonjača ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Finite Element Analysis ◽

Finite Element ◽

External Fixation ◽

Tibial Fracture ◽

Locking Plate ◽

Plate Fixation ◽

Proximal Tibial Fracture ◽

Locking Plate Fixation ◽

Element Analysis ◽

Maximum Stiffness

Abstract Background Good clinical outcomes for locking plates as an external fixator to treat tibial fractures have been reported. However, external locking plate fixation is still generally rarely performed. This study aimed to compare the stability of an external locking plate fixator with that of a conventional external fixator for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures using finite element analysis. Methods Three models were constructed: (1) external locking plate fixation of proximal tibial fracture with lateral proximal tibial locking plate and 5-mm screws (ELP), (2) conventional external fixation of proximal tibial fracture with an 11-mm rod and 5-mm Schanz screws (EF-11), and (3) conventional external fixation of a proximal tibial fracture with a 7-mm rod and 5-mm Schanz screws (EF-7). The stress distribution, displacement at the fracture gap, and stiffness of the three finite element models at 30-, 40-, 50-, and 60-mm plate–rod offsets from the lateral surface of the lateral condyle of the tibia were determined. Results The conventional external fixator showed higher stiffness than the external locking plate fixator. In all models, the stiffness decreased as the distance of the plate–rod from the bone surface increased. The maximum stiffness was 121.06 N/mm in the EF-11 model with 30-mm tibia–rod offset. In the EF-7 model group, the maximum stiffness was 40.00 N/mm in the model with 30-mm tibia–rod offset. In the ELP model group, the maximum stiffness was 35.79 N/mm in the model with 30-mm tibia–plate offset. Conclusions Finite element analysis indicated that external locking plate fixation is more flexible than conventional external fixation and can influence secondary bone healing. External locking plate fixation requires the placement of the plate as close as possible to the skin, which allows for a low-profile design because the increased distance from the plate to the bone can be too flexible for bone healing. Further experimental mechanical model tests are necessary to validate these finite element models, and further biological analysis is necessary to evaluate the effect of external locking plate fixation on fracture healing.

Download Full-text

FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF COMMINUTED PROXIMAL TIBIAL FRACTURE TREATED BY LOCKING PLATE

International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH ◽

10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i11.2020.2440 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (11) ◽

pp. 227-236

Author(s):

Harikrishna Koya ◽

Kalyan Kumar ◽

T Upendra ◽

Riyaz Sheik ◽

K Satya Kumar

Keyword(s):

Tibial Plateau ◽

Tibial Fracture ◽

Locking Plate ◽

Fracture Pattern ◽

Tibial Plateau Fractures ◽

Lateral Condyle ◽

Proximal Tibial Fracture ◽

Medial Condyle ◽

Intraarticular Fractures ◽

Plateau Fracture

Most common intraarticular fractures in knee joint are tibial plateau fractures result from indirect coronal or axial compression forces. Tibial plateau fractures constitute 1% of all fractures in the human body and 8% fractures in the older people (1). Tibial plateau fractures include varied configuration of fracture pattern involving of medial condyle (10-23%), lateral condyle (55-70%), in both (11-30%) with variable articular depression. Improper restoration of plateau fracture fragments leads to axis deviation and deformity and premature.

Download Full-text

Patients with complex proximal tibial fractures overestimate the prognosis of their injury

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery ◽

10.1007/s00068-021-01644-w ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Lena Keppler ◽

Alexander Martin Keppler ◽

Christoph Ihle ◽

Philipp Minzlaff ◽

Julian Fürmetz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Return To Work ◽

Tibial Fracture ◽

Knee Function ◽

Physical Work ◽

Return To Sports ◽

Work Intensity ◽

Proximal Tibial Fracture ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Patient Comprehension ◽

Group B

Abstract Purpose To investigate, if patients with complex proximal tibial fracture have realistic expectations on open reduction and internal fixation. Methods 114 patients (mean 49 years, SD ± 13) with closed AO-type B and C proximal tibial fracture were grouped (group B, respectively C). Prior to surgery expectations concerning knee function, pain, return to work/sports, and the risk for osteoarthritis was assessed with the Hospital for Special Surgery-Knee Surgery Expectations Survey (HFSS-KSE) and a non-validated ten-item survey. Results 92% of patients expected at least an almost natural knee postoperatively. All items regarding restoring knee function were ranked to be at least important in both groups. 65% in group B and 47% in group C expected at most occasional pain. 83% in group B and 67% in group C expected full return to work without any limitations. Patients with low physical work intensity expected significantly shorter incapacity to work in both groups (7.8, respectively 8.9 weeks). 71% in group B and 60% in group C expected to return to sports with at most small limitations. 33% in group B and 22% in group C assumed risk for osteoarthritis will be prevented by surgery. Conclusion Expectations on surgery for complex proximal tibial fracture are high regardless of fracture type. The prognosis of many health and lifestyle domains was overestimated. The risk for osteoarthritis was underestimated. This study should sensitize surgeons to discuss realistic expectations. This may help to improve patient comprehension what leads to sensible expectations, resulting in improved patients´ satisfaction. Level of evidence IV. Trial registration number 14104, Date of registration: 06/2015.

Download Full-text