scholarly journals EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON GLASS FIBER REINFORCED GYPSUM (GFRG) PANELS FILLED WITH ALTERNATE CONCRETE MIX USING FLY ASH

Author(s):  
Pankaj Kumar

There is a substantial growing demand for housing in India as the population increase rate is skyrocketing. More and more people are shifting from rural to urban areas day by day, making urban areas denser. The Ministry of Rural Development assessed that India's rustic housing lack remains at 44 million dwelling units. India's metropolitan housing lack has risen 54 percent to 29 million out of 2018 from 18.78 million of every 2012, of which 96% relates to Economically Weaker Section (EWS) and Low-Income Group (LIG) type, according to the gauge of the Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation. To address these difficulties, India requires innovative, energy-effective structure materials for a reliable, quick, and tough housing strategy for development at a moderate expense. It is likewise significant that housing structures are catastrophes impervious to secure individuals' lives and properties. Every one of these worries is engaged with a maintainable and comprehensive turn of events. One such strategy to accomplish that is by utilizing Glass Fiber Reinforced Gypsum (GFRG) panels. They serve the purpose of fast construction and be cost-efficient, earthquake-resistant, best suitable for the financially Indian backward class of people and in the country's earthquake-prone regions like Gujarat. The phosphogypsum's effective disposal is achieved through the Glass Fiber Reinforced Gypsum (GFRG) panel, also known as Rapid wall. These can be used as load-bearing as well as non-load-bearing structures. To use GFRG in load-bearing buildings, M20grade concrete is used as a filling material to overcome the hurdles provided by gravity and other factors. M20 grade concrete is used in these panels to satisfy the minimum requirements mentioned in IS 456:2000.

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (28) ◽  
pp. 3539-3556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Pascual ◽  
Julia de Castro ◽  
André Kostro ◽  
Andreas Schueler ◽  
Anastasios P Vassilopoulos ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srija Juluru ◽  
R. Divahar ◽  
G. Harishwar Goud ◽  
N. Mohan Chand ◽  
L. Rahul Reddy

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. e356-e361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaakko M. Piitulainen ◽  
Riina Mattila ◽  
Niko Moritz ◽  
Pekka K. Vallittu

Background Glass fiber-reinforced composites (FRCs) have been adapted for routine clinical use in various dental restorations and are presently also used in cranial implants. The aim of this study was to measure the load-bearing capacity and failure type of glass FRC implants during static loading with and without interconnective bars and with different fixation modes. Methods Load-bearing capacities of 2 types of FRC implants with 4 different fixation modes were experimentally tested. The sandwich-like FRC implants were made of 2 sheets of woven FRC fabric, which consisted of silanized, woven E-glass fiber fabrics impregnated in BisGMA-TEGDMA monomer resin matrix. The space between the outer and inner surfaces was filled with glass particles. All FRC implants were tested up to a 10-mm deflection with load-bearing capacity determined at 6-mm deflection. The experimental groups were compared using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis with Steel-Dwass post hoc test. Results FRC implants underwent elastic and plastic deformation until 6-mm deflection. The loading test did not demonstrate any protrusions of glass fibers or cut fiber even at 10-mm deflection. An elastic and plastic deformation of the implant occurred until the FRC sheets were separated from each other. In the cases of the freestanding setup (no fixation) and the fixation with 6 screws, the FRC implants with 2 interconnective bars showed a significantly higher load-bearing capacity compared with the implant without interconnective bars. Conclusions FRC implants used in this study showed a load-bearing capacity which may provide protection for the brain after cranial bone defect reconstruction.


2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (29) ◽  
pp. 3621-3636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Pascual ◽  
Julia de Castro ◽  
André Kostro ◽  
Andreas Schueler ◽  
Anastasios P Vassilopoulos ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 606-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sufyan Garoushi ◽  
Pekka K. Vallittu ◽  
David C. Watts ◽  
Lippo V.J. Lassila

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document