scholarly journals From bioactive implant surface coating to bioengineered tissue: the future of breast implants

Author(s):  
Schantz Jan-Thorsten
Author(s):  
Maklygina Yu S ◽  
Sharova AS ◽  
Kundu B ◽  
Balla VK ◽  
Steiner R ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 516-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer N Walker ◽  
Louis H Poppler ◽  
Chloe L Pinkner ◽  
Scott J Hultgren ◽  
Terence M Myckatyn

Abstract Background Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the most common causes of Gram-positive and Gram-negative breast implant–associated infection. Little is known about how these bacteria infect breast implants as a function of implant surface characteristics and timing of infection. Objectives The aim of this work was to establish a mouse model for studying the impact of various conditions on breast implant infection. Methods Ninety-one mice were implanted with 273 breast implant shells and infected with S. epidermidis or P. aeruginosa. Smooth, microtextured, and macrotextured breast implant shells were implanted in each mouse. Bacterial inoculation occurred during implantation or 1 day later. Implants were retrieved 1 or 7 days later. Explanted breast implant shells were sonicated, cultured, and colony-forming units determined or analyzed with scanning electron microscopy. Results P. aeruginosa could be detected on all device surfaces at 1- and 7- days post infection (dpi), when mice were implanted and infected concurrently or when they were infected 1- day after implantation. However, P. aeruginosa infection was more robust on implant shells retrieved at 7 dpi and particularly on the macrotextured devices that were infected 1 day post implantation. S. epidermidis was mostly cleared from implants when mice were infected and implanted concurrently. Other the other hand, S. epidermidis could be detected on all device surfaces at 1 dpi and 2 days post implantation. However, S. epidermdis infection was suppressed by 7 dpi and 8 days post implantation. Conclusions S. epidermidis required higher inoculating doses to cause infection and was cleared within 7 days. P. aeruginosa infected at lower inoculating doses, with robust biofilms noted 7 days later.


Author(s):  
Roger N Wixtrom ◽  
Vikram Garadi ◽  
John Leopold ◽  
John W Canady

Abstract Background The relative risks and benefits of various textured breast implants are the focus of considerable discussion. Studies have suggested different risk-benefit profiles for different implant surface topographies. Objectives The study aim was to provide device-specific, quantitative information on Mentor’s imprinted Siltex Textured breast implants with respect to textured surface characteristics and ISO 14607 classification, risk of breast implant–associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), and risk-reduction benefits relative to smooth implants. Methods Surface metrology was performed. Data for smooth and Siltex implants from the prospective MemoryGel Core Study were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis for the most frequently occurring postoperative complications in augmentation and reconstruction leading to subsequent reoperation. Results The overall average surface roughness for Siltex MemoryGel and MemoryShape implants was 29.5 and 36.1 µm, respectively. A statistically significantly lower rate of reoperation in patients with Siltex compared with smooth devices over 10 years was observed for both capsular contracture in subglandular primary augmentation patients (2.02% vs 19.84%) and for asymmetry in primary reconstruction patients (3.88% vs 11.1%). Conclusions Surface analysis demonstrated that Siltex implants fall within the ISO 14607 category of “microtexture” breast implants. These devices exhibited a rare risk of BIA-ALCL (0.0012%) based on the most extensive data available. Relative to smooth implants, these Siltex devices provided risk-reduction benefits for the most common reason of reoperation in patients who underwent primary augmentation (capsular contracture) or primary reconstruction (asymmetry) in the Core Study. These findings provide valuable risk-benefit information for surgeons and their patients. Level of Evidence: 2


Author(s):  
Gnanasekar Sathishkumar ◽  
Gopinath Kasi ◽  
Kai Zhang ◽  
En-Tang Kang ◽  
Liqun Xu ◽  
...  

Medical devices and surgical implants are a necessary part of tissue engineering and regenerative medicines. However, the biofouling and microbial colonization on the implant surface continues to be a major...


1994 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. 942-948 ◽  
Author(s):  
David K. Dennison ◽  
Markus B. Huerzeler ◽  
Carlos Quinones ◽  
Raul G. Caffesse

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 499-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Lista ◽  
Ryan E Austin ◽  
Maryam Saheb-Al-Zamani ◽  
Jamil Ahmad

Abstract Background Previous studies have reported decreased rates of capsular contracture associated with the use of textured surface breast implants placed in the subglandular plane during breast augmentation. However, since the publication of these studies, our understanding of the pathophysiology of capsular contracture, as well as the surgical techniques utilized to minimize bacterial contamination of the implant, have advanced considerably. Objectives The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate the relation between implant surface texturization and capsular contracture rates for breast implants placed in the subglandular plane during primary breast augmentation. Methods Retrospective chart review was performed of all primary subglandular breast augmentation procedures involving the use of either smooth or textured round silicone gel implants, with or without simultaneous mastopexy. The primary outcome measures included clinically significant capsular contracture (Baker grade III/IV) and revision surgery for capsular contracture. Results Between 2010 and 2017, 526 patients underwent primary subglandular breast augmentation with either smooth (n = 212) or textured (n = 314) round silicone gel implants; 248 patients underwent breast augmentation, whereas 278 underwent breast augmentation-mastopexy. Average follow-up was 756 days in the textured group and 461 days in the smooth group. Five cases of capsular contracture were observed in the textured group, and 7 cases of capsular contracture were observed in the smooth group (P = 0.20). Conclusions Smooth surface implants placed in the subglandular plane were not at a significantly increased risk of capsular contracture compared with textured surface implants. We suggest that adherence to a surgical technique focused on minimizing bacterial contamination of the implant is of greater clinical significance than implant surface characteristics when discussing capsular contracture. Level of Evidence: 4


2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 331-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Abel de la Peña-Salcedo ◽  
Miguel Angel Soto-Miranda ◽  
Jose Fernando Lopez-Salguero

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document