scholarly journals Cognitive profiles of fluent and non-fluent aphasia with the Russian version of Oxford Cognitive Screen

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Shendyapina ◽  
Brendan Weekes
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Shendyapina ◽  
Ekaterina Kuzmina ◽  
Sergey Kazymaev ◽  
Anna Petrova ◽  
Nele Demeyere ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Shendyapina ◽  
Ekaterina Kuzmina ◽  
Sergey Kazymaev ◽  
Anna Petrova ◽  
Jane Riddoch ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Shendyapina ◽  
Ekaterina Kuzmina ◽  
Sergey Kazymaev ◽  
Anna Petrova ◽  
Nele Demeyere ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Hinckley

Abstract A patient with aphasia that is uncomplicated by other cognitive abilities will usually show a primary impairment of language. The frequency of additional cognitive impairments associated with cerebrovascular disease, multiple (silent or diagnosed) infarcts, or dementia increases with age and can complicate a single focal lesion that produces aphasia. The typical cognitive profiles of vascular dementia or dementia due to cerebrovascular disease may differ from the cognitive profile of patients with Alzheimer's dementia. In order to complete effective treatment selection, clinicians must know the cognitive profile of the patient and choose treatments accordingly. When attention, memory, and executive function are relatively preserved, strategy-based and conversation-based interventions provide the best choices to target personally relevant communication abilities. Examples of treatments in this category include PACE and Response Elaboration Training. When patients with aphasia have co-occurring episodic memory or executive function impairments, treatments that rely less on these abilities should be selected. Examples of treatments that fit these selection criteria include spaced retrieval and errorless learning. Finally, training caregivers in the use of supportive communication strategies is helpful to patients with aphasia, with or without additional cognitive complications.


Author(s):  
Jörg-Tobias Kuhn ◽  
Elena Ise ◽  
Julia Raddatz ◽  
Christin Schwenk ◽  
Christian Dobel

Abstract. Objective: Deficits in basic numerical skills, calculation, and working memory have been found in children with developmental dyscalculia (DD) as well as children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This paper investigates cognitive profiles of children with DD and/or ADHD symptoms (AS) in a double dissociation design to obtain a better understanding of the comorbidity of DD and ADHD. Method: Children with DD-only (N = 33), AS-only (N = 16), comorbid DD+AS (N = 20), and typically developing controls (TD, N = 40) were assessed on measures of basic numerical processing, calculation, working memory, processing speed, and neurocognitive measures of attention. Results: Children with DD (DD, DD+AS) showed deficits in all basic numerical skills, calculation, working memory, and sustained attention. Children with AS (AS, DD+AS) displayed more selective difficulties in dot enumeration, subtraction, verbal working memory, and processing speed. Also, they generally performed more poorly in neurocognitive measures of attention, especially alertness. Children with DD+AS mostly showed an additive combination of the deficits associated with DD-only and A_Sonly, except for subtraction tasks, in which they were less impaired than expected. Conclusions: DD and AS appear to be related to largely distinct patterns of cognitive deficits, which are present in combination in children with DD+AS.



2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. G. Klimanova ◽  
A. V. Trusova ◽  
A. S. Kiselev ◽  
V. A. Berntsev ◽  
D. I. Gromyko ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document