scholarly journals Nearshore Larval Retention and Cross-Shelf Migration of Benthic Crustaceans at an Upwelling Center

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven G. Morgan ◽  
Seth H. Miller ◽  
Matt J. Robart ◽  
John L. Largier
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Lindo‐Atichati ◽  
Yanli Jia ◽  
Johanna L. K. Wren ◽  
Andreas Antoniades ◽  
Donald R. Kobayashi

Sarsia ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Sætre ◽  
R. Toresen ◽  
H. Søiland ◽  
P. Fossum

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 553-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Stephenson ◽  
Michael J. Power ◽  
Shawn W. Laffan ◽  
Iain M. Suthers

2014 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
pp. 105-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Cuif ◽  
David Michael Kaplan ◽  
Jérôme Lefèvre ◽  
Vincent Martin Faure ◽  
Matthieu Caillaud ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 1055-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sinclair ◽  
M. J. Tremblay

Each population of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus harengus) has its own seasonally fixed spawning period of a few weeks duration, but the mean spawning times of different populations differ substantially. The extant theory explains the population-specific timing of spawning relative to the plankton production blooms in the inferred larval distributional area. Support of this theory is evaluated, and found lacking, in the light of a recent "stock" hypothesis involving larval retention. The new hypothesis involves two constraints. First, the larvae of a discrete herring population develop within, and are thus adapted to, the specific oceanographic conditions of their larval retention area. Second, metamorphosis from the larval to juvenile form occurs primarily within a restricted period of the year (April to October). Given these two constraints, it is hypothesized that the timing of spawning of a herring population is a function of the time necessary to complete the larval phase and yet metamorphose within the acceptable seasonal envelope. Populations that have "good" larval retention areas can spawn in the spring and still metamorphose within the seasonal envelope. Populations with larval retention areas that are less "good" for larval growth have to spawn earlier to satisfy the two constraints. The implications of the hypothesis on the "match–mismatch" theory are briefly discussed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 507 ◽  
pp. 233-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Bartilotti ◽  
A dos Santos ◽  
M Castro ◽  
Á Peliz ◽  
AMP Santos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document