scholarly journals Pre-operative/Neoadjuvant Therapy and Vascular Debranching Followed by Resection for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (PREVADER): Clinical Feasibility Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Ronellenfitsch ◽  
Christoph W. Michalski ◽  
Patrick Michl ◽  
Sebastian Krug ◽  
Joerg Ukkat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Feasibility Trial ◽  
Arterial Reconstruction ◽  
Visceral Arteries

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer continues to have a poor outcome. Many patients are diagnosed with advanced disease, and in a considerable proportion, abutment or invasion of visceral arteries is present. Moreover, some patients have anatomical variations or stenosis of major visceral arteries requiring arterial reconstruction upon pancreatic cancer resection to avoid organ ischemia. Simultaneous arterial reconstruction during resection is associated with relevant morbidity and mortality. This trial evaluates the approach of visceral debranching, that is, arterial reconstruction, prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and tumor resection in patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer.Methods and Analysis: The trial includes patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic pancreatic cancer with arterial abutment or invasion (deemed primarily unresectable), variations in vascular anatomy, or stenosis of visceral arteries. The participants undergo visceral debranching, followed by current standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (mFOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine–nab-paclitaxel, or other) and potential subsequent tumor resection. The primary outcome is feasibility, measured as the proportion of patients who start neoadjuvant therapy within 6 weeks of visceral debranching. The trial has an exact single-stage design. The proportion below which the treatment is considered ineffective is set at 0.7 (H0). The proportion above which the treatment warrants further exploration in a phase III trial is set at 0.9 (H1). With a power (1-beta) of 0.8 and a type 1 mistake (alpha) of 0.05, the required sample size is 28 patients. Feasibility of the approach will be assumed if 24 of the enrolled 28 patients proceed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy within 6 weeks from visceral debranching.Discussion: This trial evaluates a new treatment sequence, that is, visceral debranching followed by chemotherapy and resection, for pancreatic cancer with invasion or abutment of visceral arteries. The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate feasibility. Trial results will allow for estimating treatment effects and calculating the sample size of a randomized controlled trial, in which the approach will be tested if the feasibility endpoint is met.Clinical Trial Registration:clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT04136769.

R0 resection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer encasing major visceral arteries using arterial reconstruction: Short- and long-term results.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14679-e14679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Genyk ◽  
Lea Matsuoka ◽  
Anthony B. El-Khoueiry ◽  
Syma Iqbal ◽  
James Buxbaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Arterial Reconstruction ◽  
Arterial Involvement ◽  
Visceral Arteries ◽  
Disease Free

e14679 Background: Locally advanced disease is found in about 40% of patients with pancreatic cancer at initial presentation. Tumors involving major visceral arteries are commonly deemed unresectable. In this study we analyzed the feasibility of R0 resection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer encasing major visceral arteries using arterial reconstruction. Methods: The following data were collected: age, gender, operative details, post-operative complications, chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy and overall and disease free survival. Patient survival was calculated utilizing Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimates. Results: From Dec., 2002 to Jan., 2012, 13 patients underwent pancreatic resection with concomitant resection and reconstruction of major visceral arteries for pancreatic cancer (9 males and 4 females, median age 63 yrs (range: 50–82 yrs)). The arterial involvement included celiac artery (n=6), superior mesenteric artery (n=4) and hepatic artery (n=3). Resections included pancreatico-duodenectomy (n=9), distal pancreatectomy (n=3), and total pancreatectomy (n=1). Management of the arterial involvement included: resection of celiac axis without reconstruction (n=2), reconstruction of one artery (n=6), two arteries (n=4) and three arteries (n=1). Nine of the 13 patients underwent simultaneous venous reconstruction. R0 resection was accomplished in 11, R1 in 1, and R2 in 1 patient. Ten of the 13 patients received neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemo- or chemo-radiation therapy outside protocols. To date, 4 patients are alive and disease free at 1, 4, 15 and 111 months, and 1 patient is alive with recurrence at 100 months. Six-month patient survival was 65% and median overall survival was 17 months. The probability of 5-year survival was 22%. Conclusions: Our study indicates that in select patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer with involvement of major visceral arteries R0 resection is feasible by performing pancreatic resection with arterial reconstruction. The survival data in this group of patients are encouraging and provide the opportunity to reconsider the contraindications to surgical management of such patients.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation and intraoperative electron irradiation for locally unresectable/borderline resectable pancreas adenocarcinoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 327-327
Author(s):  
Jonathan Ben Ashman ◽  
Adyr A Moss ◽  
Matthew D. Callister ◽  
Kunam S Reddy ◽  
David C Mulligan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Electron Irradiation ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Pancreas Adenocarcinoma ◽  
The Impact

327 Background: The use of preoperative therapy for pancreatic cancer remains controversial. This study reviews our experience using neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation (CRT) followed by surgery with intraoperative electron irradiation (IOERT) for patients with borderline resectable (BR) or unresectable (UR) tumors. Methods: A retrospective review identified 48 patients (pts) with primary BR/UR pancreas adenocarcinoma treated with preop CRT with intent to proceed to curative surgery with IOERT. Seventeen patients did not undergo attempted resection and are excluded (disease progression, 12; medically inoperable, 3; declined surgery, 2). Thirty-one patients proceeded to resection attempt and are the subject of this analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed using log rank test for significance. Median follow up was 19 months (mo). Results: Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 11 pts, R1 in 5, and R2 or not resected (IOERT alone) in 15 patients. Twenty-six pts died (23 of disease, 2 unrelated causes, 1 uncertain). Median overall survival (OS) was 19 mo for all pts. Local progression was detected in only 5 patients (16%) while distant disease developed in 24 (77%). Resection status significantly correlated with OS; R0/R1 patients had a median survival of 23 mo vs. 10 mo for R2/unresected tumors (p = 0.002). Three-year OS was 35% vs. 0%, respectively. Survival was not influenced by tumor location, CA19-9 baseline or response, tumor size, or initial judgment of resectability (BR vs. UR). BR tumors were resectable after neoadjuvant therapy in 9 of 11 patients (R0, 8; R1, 1) while 8 of 20 initially UR tumors underwent resection (R0, 3; R1, 4; R2, 1). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy combined with IOERT has the possibility to improve patient selection for surgical resection and to optimize local therapy. Although the prognosis for locally advanced pancreatic cancer remains poor, survival was superior among patients for whom R0 or R1 resection was achieved. Distant metastasis remained the dominant pattern of failure, and novel systemic agents are needed. Prospective evaluation of the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, CRT, and IOERT is warranted.

The impact of pancreatic cancer resection in the era of effective systemic treatment.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 722-722
Author(s):  
Yaacov Richard Lawrence ◽  
Ofer Margalit ◽  
Galia Jacobson ◽  
Liat Hamer ◽  
Uri Amit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
The Impact

722 Background: Surgical resection is the only curative modality in pancreatic cancer, yet the vast majority of patients undergoing surgery succumb of their disease. No randomized studies have been performed to assess the survival impact of the procedure. We hypothesized that in the era of effective systemic treatments, the survival advantage of surgical resection would be lessened. Methods: A meta-analysis of published phase III clinical trials in pancreatic cancer in both the post resection adjuvant setting and the locally advanced metastatic setting, based upon indirect aggregate data. Data was stratified based upon the systemic agents used. Patients from trials arms for which there were not complementary data sets with/without surgical resection were excluded. Primary endpoint was 3 year overall survival (OS). Results: Trials were published between 1997 and 2018. A total of 2722 patients were included in the data analysis, of whom 1645 underwent tumor resection and 814 were metastatic. Median follow-up was 40 months. Analyses were performed of five systemic options with / without tumor resection. Across the trials averaged 3 yr OS was 0%, 0.8%, 0%, and 3.8% for 5FU, gemcitabine, gemcitabine + capecitabine, & FOLFIRINOX respectively; and 18.1%, 30.0%, 37.9%, 42.5%, and 62.5% for the same systemic treatments delivered following surgical resection. Hence the additive impact of surgical resection on absolute 3 yr OS was only 18.1% in the absence of systemic treatment, but 30.0%, 37.1%, 42.5% and 58.8% in the presence of 5FU, gemcitabine, gemcitabine + capecitabine, FOLFIRINOX respectively. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this analysis, it appears that our hypothesis was incorrect, and that the opposite is true. The introduction of effective systemic therapies has greatly increased the impact of pancreatic surgery on long-term survival in pancreatic cancer. Consequently, every effort should be made to bring patients to curative resection.

scholarly journals Induction Chemotherapy for Primarily Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma—Who Will Benefit from a Secondary Resection?

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Nathalie Rosumeck ◽  
Lea Timmermann ◽  
Fritz Klein ◽  
Marcus Bahra ◽  
Sebastian Stintzig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Secondary Resection ◽  
Number Of Patients

Background and Objectives: An increasing number of patients (pts) with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are treated with an intensive neoadjuvant therapy to obtain a secondary curative resection. Only a certain number of patients benefit from this intention. The aim of this investigation was to identify prognostic factors which may predict a benefit for secondary resection. Materials and Methods: Survival time and clinicopathological data of pts with pancreatic cancer were prospective and consecutively collected in our Comprehensive Cancer Center Database. For this investigation, we screened for pts with primarily unresectable pancreatic cancer who underwent a secondary resection after receiving induction therapy in the time between March 2017 and May 2019. Results: 40 pts had a sufficient database to carry out a reliable analysis. The carbohydrate-antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level of the pts treated with induction therapy decreased by 44.7% from 4358.3 U/mL to 138.5 U/mL (p = 0.001). The local cancer extension was significantly reduced (p < 0.001), and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was lowered (p = 0.03). The median overall survival (mOS) was 20 months (95% CI: 17.2–22.9). Pts who showed a normal CA 19-9 level (<37 U/mL) at diagnosis and after neoadjuvant therapy or had a Body Mass Index (BMI) below 25 kg/m2 after chemotherapy had a significant prolonged overall survival (29 vs. 19 months, p = 0.02; 26 vs. 18 months, p = 0.04; 15 vs. 24 months, p = 0.01). Pts who still presented elevated CA 19-9 levels >400 U/mL after induction therapy did not profit from a secondary resection (24 vs. 7 months, p < 0.001). Nodal negativity as well as the performance of an adjuvant therapy lead to better mOS (25 vs. 15 months, p = 0.003; 10 vs. 25 months, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The pts in our investigation had different benefits from the multimodal treatment. We identified the CA 19-9 level at time of diagnosis and after neoadjuvant therapy as well as the preoperative BMI as predictive factors for overall survival. Furthermore, diagnostics of presurgical nodal status should gain more importance as nodal negativity is associated with better outcome.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Compared With Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Cancer of the Stomach and Cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Randomized Trial 40954

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (35) ◽  
pp. 5210-5218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Schuhmacher ◽  
Stephan Gretschel ◽  
Florian Lordick ◽  
Peter Reichardt ◽  
Werner Hohenberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Preoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Postoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate

PurposePatients with locally advanced gastric cancer benefit from combined pre- and postoperative chemotherapy, although fewer than 50% could receive postoperative chemotherapy. We examined the value of purely preoperative chemotherapy in a phase III trial with strict preoperative staging and surgical resection guidelines.Patients and MethodsPatients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction (AEG II and III) were randomly assigned to preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery or to surgery alone. To detect with 80% power an improvement in median survival from 17 months with surgery alone to 24 months with neoadjuvant, 282 events were required.ResultsThis trial was stopped for poor accrual after 144 patients were randomly assigned (72:72); 52.8% patients had tumors located in the proximal third of the stomach, including AEG type II and III. The International Union Against Cancer R0 resection rate was 81.9% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as compared with 66.7% with surgery alone (P = .036). The surgery-only group had more lymph node metastases than the neoadjuvant group (76.5% v 61.4%; P = .018). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the neoadjuvant arm (27.1% v 16.2%; P = .09). After a median follow-up of 4.4 years and 67 deaths, a survival benefit could not be shown (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.35; P = .466).ConclusionThis trial showed a significantly increased R0 resection rate but failed to demonstrate a survival benefit. Possible explanations are low statistical power, a high rate of proximal gastric cancer including AEG and/or a better outcome than expected after radical surgery alone due to the high quality of surgery with resections of regional lymph nodes outside the perigastic area (celiac trunc, hepatic ligament, lymph node at a. lienalis; D2).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document