scholarly journals End-of-Life Care Decision-Making in Stroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy Gao ◽  
Charlie W. Zhao ◽  
David Y. Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Code Status

Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and long-term disability in the United States. Though advances in interventions have improved patient survival after stroke, prognostication of long-term functional outcomes remains challenging, thereby complicating discussions of treatment goals. Stroke patients who require intensive care unit care often do not have the capacity themselves to participate in decision making processes, a fact that further complicates potential end-of-life care discussions after the immediate post-stroke period. Establishing clear, consistent communication with surrogates through shared decision-making represents best practice, as these surrogates face decisions regarding artificial nutrition, tracheostomy, code status changes, and withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining therapies. Throughout decision-making, clinicians must be aware of a myriad of factors affecting both provider recommendations and surrogate concerns, such as cognitive biases. While decision aids have the potential to better frame these conversations within intensive care units, aids specific to goals-of-care decisions for stroke patients are currently lacking. This mini review highlights the difficulties in decision-making for critically ill ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage patients, beginning with limitations in current validated clinical scales and clinician subjectivity in prognostication. We outline processes for identifying patient preferences when possible and make recommendations for collaborating closely with surrogate decision-makers on end-of-life care decisions.

How individual ethical frameworks shape physician trainees’ experiences providing end-of-life care: a qualitative study

2021 ◽  
pp. medethics-2020-106690
Author(s):  
Sarah Rosenwohl-Mack ◽  
Daniel Dohan ◽  
Thea Matthews ◽  
Jason Neil Batten ◽  
Elizabeth Dzeng
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Ethical Framework ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Ethical Frameworks

ObjectivesThe end of life is an ethically challenging time requiring complex decision-making. This study describes ethical frameworks among physician trainees, explores how these frameworks manifest and relates these frameworks to experiences delivering end-of-life care.DesignWe conducted semistructured in-depth exploratory qualitative interviews with physician trainees about experiences of end-of-life care and moral distress. We analysed the interviews using thematic analysis.SettingAcademic teaching hospitals in the United States and United Kingdom.ParticipantsWe interviewed 30 physician trainees. We purposefully sampled across three domains we expected to be associated with individual ethics (stage of training, gender and national healthcare context) in order to elicit a diversity of ethical and experiential perspectives.ResultsSome trainees subscribed to a best interest ethical framework, characterised by offering recommendations consistent with the patient’s goals and values, presenting only medically appropriate choices and supporting shared decision-making between the patient/family and medical team. Others endorsed an autonomy framework, characterised by presenting all technologically feasible choices, refraining from offering recommendations and prioritising the voice of patient/family as the decision-maker.ConclusionsThis study describes how physician trainees conceptualise their roles as being rooted in an autonomy or best interest framework. Physician trainees have limited clinical experience and decision-making autonomy and may have ethical frameworks that are dynamic and potentially highly influenced by experiences providing end-of-life care. A better understanding of how individual physicians’ ethical frameworks influences the care they give provides opportunities to improve patient communication and advance the role of shared decision-making to ensure goal-aligned end-of-life care.

The pyramid of treatment levels: A tool to convey goal-based treatment options.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 147-147
Author(s):  
Heather Leeper ◽  
Andrew Kamell
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Symptom Management ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Goals Of Care ◽  
Code Status ◽  
Wide Range

147 Background: 60% of Americans die in acute care hospitals and under 40% of advanced cancer patients have end-of-life care discussions with their health care providers. Didactic methods and tools to teach about symptom management, navigation of treatment decisions, code status, and end-of-life care decisions within an inpatient setting are a necessity to meet this high demand. Methods: A model of medical care systematically dividing clinical management decisions into escalating levels of medical care relative to illness severity, treatment goals, and code status was created. The model is illustrated as a pyramid with a base of symptom management as the initial level of medical care. The second level represents disease-focused medical care including antibiotics, disease-modifying drugs, and chemotherapy administration. Hospitalization with increasingly complex and invasive interventions represents the third level followed by critical illness care including ICU admission and vasopressors as the fourth level. Intubation comprises the fifth level and CPR forms the top of the pyramid. Results: This model has been used extensively at our institution in educating medical students, residents, fellows, and faculty. All groups reported it was helpful in understanding POLST forms, code status, and collaboratively developing appropriate goal-based care plans with their patients. Symptom management remaining as a non-negotiable foundation of care emphasizes its importance. This depiction of medical care may facilitate goals of care and code status discussions and is particularly helpful for determining appropriate care goals or options when considering de-escalation of medical therapies. Used implicitly or explicitly in patient and family discussions, it has facilitated decision-making and discerning the appropriateness of the overall treatment plan relative to patient goals of care. Conclusions: This model of care with its companion pyramid accommodate a wide range of clinical scenarios, is an effective, high yield didactic device for patients, families, and healthcare providers alike, and has applications as supportive tool to optimize goal-based clinical decision making in the context of serious illness.

End-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a challenge for nurses

2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 230-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
PA Miller ◽  
S Forbes ◽  
DK Boyle
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Nursing Practice ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Cultural Issues ◽  
End Of Life Decision ◽  
Life Decision

Results from several research studies combined with increasing public tensions surrounding physician-assisted suicide have fueled a growing awareness of the inadequacies of end-of-life care. Investigators also suggest that intensive care unit nurses have a limited role in end-of-life decision making and care planning. This article explores cultural issues influencing end-of-life care in intensive care units, explores factors surrounding the limited involvement of critical care nurses in end-of-life decision making and care planning, and offers recommendations for changing nursing practice. Because improving end-of-life care will require cultural changes, an understanding of the cultural issues involved is needed. Recommendations for changing nursing practice include a model of end-of-life care that incorporates the goals of both cure and comfort care, as well as a shared decision-making process. Nurses are essential to improving end-of-life care in today's intensive care units.

Beyond the hour of death: Family experiences of grief and bereavement following an end-of-life hospitalization in the intensive care unit

2020 ◽  
pp. 136345932094647
Author(s):  
Julia I Bandini
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Family Experiences ◽  
End Of Life Decision ◽  
Life Decision

End-of-life decision-making is an important area of research, and few sociological studies have considered family grief in light of end-of-life decision-making in the hospital. Drawing on in-depth interviews with family members in the intensive care unit (ICU) during an end-of-life hospitalization and into their bereavement period up to six months after the death of the patient, this article examines bereaved family members’ experiences of grief by examining three aspects from the end-of-life hospitalization and decision-making in the ICU that informed their subsequent bereavement experiences. First, this article explores how the process of advance care planning (ACP) shaped family experiences of grief, by demonstrating that even prior informal conversations around end-of-life care outside of having an advance directive in the hospital was beneficial for family members both during the hospitalization and afterwards in bereavement. Second, clinicians’ compassionate caring for both patients and families through the “little things” or small gestures were important to families during the end-of-life hospitalization and afterwards in bereavement. Third, the transition time in the hospital before the patient’s death facilitated family experiences of grief by providing a sense of support and meaning in bereavement. The findings have implications for clinicians who provide end-of-life care by highlighting salient aspects from the hospitalization that may shape family grief following the patient’s death. Most importantly, the notion that ACP as a social process may be a “gift” to families during end-of-life decision-making and carry through into bereavement can serve as a motivator to engage patients in ACP.

scholarly journals Characteristics and outcomes of mechanically ventilated elderly patients in the absence of an end-of-life care policy: a retrospective study from Bahrain

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 222-231
Author(s):  
Mahmood Al Saeed ◽  
Barrak Mahmood Almoosawi ◽  
Mahmmod Al Awainati ◽  
Mohammed Al Barni ◽  
Fadhel Abbas
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Policy ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Long Term Ventilation

BACKGROUND: Globally, the percentage of elderly patients has been increasing, leading to a higher demand for healthcare resources and intensive care. Bahrain has a majority Muslim population and Islam governs most policies, including end-of-life care. All patients at our institute receive full resuscitative measures regardless of the prognosis, leading to a high number of mechanically ventilated patients. OBJECTIVES: Assess characteristics, outcomes, theoretical costs, and use of antibiotics in critically ill elderly patients requiring mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Intensive care unit and general ward of a tertiary medical care center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied all elderly patients (≥60 years old) admitted under general medicine in the period of January to June 2018 who needed intensive care and were intubated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The duration of mechanical ventilation, theoretical costs, antibiotic usage. SAMPLE SIZE: 140 patients. RESULTS: Of 140 patients, 136 died (97%) and half of the deaths (n=69, 50.7%) occurred within the first 24 hours of intubation. Sixty-nine (79.3%) of the patients on short-term ventilation (≤96 hours) died within 24 hours of intubation, while the four survivors were on long-term ventilation (>96 hours) ( P <.001). All the nonsurviving patients (n=136) were on antimicrobial therapy, mostly for hospital-acquired infections. The median (interquartile range) APACHE II score was relatively high at 28.0 (8.0) with significantly higher scores in the early mortality group compared to the late mortality group (30 [10] vs 26 [7], P =.013) and higher scores in the short-term vs long-term ventilation group (29 [10] vs 26 [7], P =.029). The median theoretical cost per patient in the early and late mortality groups was USD 10 731 and USD 30 660, respectively ( P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Given that less than 3% of patients had a favorable outcome, 50% of the cases died within 24 hours after intubation, hospital costs and antimicrobial use were high, the current policy of “full resuscitative measures for all” should be revised. We suggest implementing an end-of-life care policy, since the goal of resuscitation is to reverse premature death, not prolong the dying process. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and absence of long-term follow-up. Theoretical costs were used as no direct calculated costs were available in our hospital. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document