scholarly journals Is Additional Systematic Biopsy Necessary in All Initial Prostate Biopsy Patients With Abnormal MRI?

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueqing Cheng ◽  
Jinshun Xu ◽  
Yuntian Chen ◽  
Zhenhua Liu ◽  
Guangxi Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
Grade Group ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Large Prostate ◽  
Systematic Biopsy ◽  
Biopsy Method

PurposeTo determine whether additional systematic biopsy is necessary in all biopsy naïve patients with MRI visible lesions by taking PI-RADS score and prostate volume into consideration.Materials and MethodsPatients who underwent combined systematic biopsy (SB) and cognitive MRI-targeted biopsy (TB) in our hospital between May 2018 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The detection rate of clinical significant prostate cancer (csPCa), biopsy grade group (GG) concordance, and disease upgrading rate on radical prostatectomy were compared between SB and TB and further stratified by PI-RADS v2.0 category and prostate volume.ResultsA total of 234 patients were analyzed in this study. TB alone detected more csPCa and less clinically insignificant prostate cancer (cisPCa) than SB alone in the whole cohort (57.3 vs 53%, P = 0.041; 3.8 vs 7.7%, P = 0.049 respectively). The additional SB indicated only a marginal increase of csPCa detection but a remarkable increase of cisPCa detection compared with targeted biopsy (59.4 vs 57.3%, P = 0.064; 3.8 vs 7.7%, P = 0.012). As stratified by PI-RADS category, the difference of csPCa detection rate between TB and SB was not significant either in PI-RADS 5 subgroup (83.8 vs 76.3%, P = 0.07) or in PI-RADS 3–4 subgroup (43.5 vs 40.9%, P = 1.0). Additional SB decreased the rate of disease upgrading on radical prostatectomy (RP) than TB alone in PI-RADS 3–4 subgroup (14.5 vs 25.5%, P = 0.031) other than PI-RADS 5 subgroup (6 vs 6%, P = 1.0). When stratified by prostate volume (PV), TB alone detected more csPCa than SB in small prostate (PV < 30 ml) group (81.0 vs 71.0%, P = 0.021) but not in large prostate (PV ≥ 30 ml) group (44.0 vs 42.7%, P = 0.754). The additional SB did not significantly decrease the rate of disease upgrading on RP than TB alone in either small or large prostate (6.4 vs 8.5%, P = 1.0; 13.8 vs 22.4%, P = 0.063).ConclusionThe combination biopsy method was no superior than targeted biopsy alone in PI-RADS 5 or in small volume prostate subgroup.

scholarly journals Magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate can be improved by adding systematic biopsy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Mihail Cauni ◽  
Dan Stanescu ◽  
Florin Tanase ◽  
Bogdan Mihai ◽  
Cristian Persu
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Cancer Detection Rate ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Systematic Biopsy

Aim: Magnetic resonance/ ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (Tbs) is widely used for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of our study was to compare the cancer detection rate (CDR) and the clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate (csPCa) of the magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy with those of the standard systematic biopsy (Sbs) and of the combination of both techniques.Material and methods: A total of 182 patients underwent magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion Tbs on the prostate for PCa suspicion based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI) detection of lesions with PI-RADSv2 score ≥3. A total of 78 patients had prior negative biopsies. Tb was performed by taking 2-4 cores from each suspected lesion, followed by Sb with 12 cores. We evaluated the overall detection rate of PCa and clinically significant prostate cancer, defined as any PCa with Gleason score ≥3+4.Results: Median prostate specific antigen (PSA) level pre-biopsy was 7.4 ng/ml and median free-PSA/PSA ratio was 10.2%. Patient median age was 62 years old. PIRADSv2 score was 3 in 54 cases, 4 in 96 cases and 5 in 32 cases. PI-RADS-dependent detection rate of Tbs for scores 3, 4 and 5 was 25.9%, 65.6% and 84.4%, respectively, with csPCa detection rates of 24.1%, 54.2%, and 71.9%. Overall detection rate was 57.1% for Tbs, which increased to 60.4% by adding Sbs results. Detection rate for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was 48.4% and increased to 51.1% by adding Sbs. Overall detection rate for repeated biopsy was 50% and 68.3% for biopsy in naïve patients. Sbs detection rate was 55.5%, 8 patients having a negative biopsy on Tbs.Conclusions: When Tbs is considered due to a PI-RADS ≥3 lesion on mMRI, combined Tbs + Sbs increases the overall CDR and csPCa detection rates.

scholarly journals Focused Submission of Tissue for Radical Prostatectomy Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Targeted Biopsy

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-50
Author(s):  
Danielle Fasciano ◽  
Marie-Lisa Eich ◽  
Maria del Carmen Rodriguez Pena ◽  
Soroush Rais-Bahrami ◽  
Jennifer Gordetsky
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Margin Status ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Grade Group ◽  
Significant Difference

Prostate cancer can be difficult to appreciate grossly and therefore partial sampling of the gland can lead to incorrect grading, staging, or margin status. However, submitting the entire prostate is more time consuming and costly. We investigated the use of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-targeted biopsy for the selective submission of prostatectomy specimens. We performed a retrospective review for patients with cancer on targeted prostate biopsy who underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy. Prostatectomy specimens were submitted in their entirety and assessed for Grade Group, extraprostatic extension (EPE), margins, and number of blocks. For Targeted-Grossing (TG) assessment, apex margin, bladder neck margin, seminal vesicles, and vas deferens sections were included. For the remainder of the prostate, only sections from areas shown to be positive for cancer on targeted biopsy were included in the analysis. With total tissue submission, EPE was found in 39/81 (48.1%) cases and positive margins in 19/81 (23.5%) cases. The TG method required significantly fewer blocks: 15.8 ± 5.9 versus 44.9 ± 11.9 ( P < .0001). The TG method would have diagnosed the correct stage in 73/81 (90.1%) cases, Grade Group in 74/81 (91.4%) cases, and margin status in 79/81 (97.5%) cases. EPE was missed completely by the TG method in 7 cases ( P = .008), of which 5/7 (71.4%) had focal EPE. There was no significant difference in stage ( P = .24), Grade Group ( P = .95), or margin status ( P = .16) between the 2 methods. Grossing utilizing selective tissue submission from areas found to be positive for prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-targeted prostate biopsy remains inferior to complete submission of tissue for radical prostatectomy specimens.

scholarly journals Cognitive mpMRI/TRUS biopsy of the prostate with using strain elastography

2019 ◽  
pp. 100-108
Author(s):  
A. V. Vasilev ◽  
A. V. Mishchenko ◽  
R. A. Kadyrleev ◽  
A. S. Petrova ◽  
A. K. Nosov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Peripheral Zone ◽  
Additional Parameter ◽  
Gleason Grade ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
Fusion Biopsy ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Systematic Biopsy

Purpose. To evaluate the effectiveness of prostate cancer detection with method of cognitive mpMRI/TRUS fusion biopsy using strain sonoelastography.Materials and methods. Cognitive transrectal fusion biopsy of prostate was performed in 32 patients. According to the data of a preliminary conducted mpMRI, 33 foci suspicious of prostate cancer were included (PIRADSv2 = 3–5). Before the biopsy, all patients underwent ultrasound planning using compression sonoelastography.Results. The overall sensitivity was 76% for the targeted biopsy, and 49% for systematic biopsy. The number of biopsy specimens with a clinically significant Gleason grade in the targeted biopsy group was 85% of all columns with cancer specimens, in the systematic biopsy group this number was 68%. On average, the Gleason grade after targeted biopsy was 7.5 ± 0.9, and it was 7.2 ± 0.9 in the columns after systematic biopsy. On average, the percentage of tumor in the columns after targeted biopsy was 72% ± 29% and it was 55% ± 35% in the columns after systematic biopsy. The false positive for mpMRI was 15%. The overall sensitivity for the strain sonoelastography was 69% in this study, clinically significant cancer was detected in 71% of all columns with cancer specimens. False positive for elastography was observed in 18% of cases.Conclusion. Comparing with systematic biopsy, cognitive mpMRI / TRUS fusion biopsy can improve the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer and reduce the number of detected cases of clinically insignificant cancer. In cases of a total or subtotal tumor lesion in the peripheral zone detected on mpMRI, it is possible to take fewer columns for morphological verification of the tumor. The use of compression sonoelastography as an additional parameter of navigation in cognitive mpMRI/TRUS fusion biopsy can be considered as a promising way to increase the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Visibility of MRI prostate lesions on B-mode transrectal ultrasound

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 441
Author(s):  
Fabian Steinkohl ◽  
Anna Katharina Luger ◽  
Renate Pichler ◽  
Jasmin Bektic ◽  
Peter Rehder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Multiparametric Mri ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
Prostate Biopsies ◽  
Clinically Significant

Aim: Prostate biopsies are usually done with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in B-mode (B TRUS) but multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is the gold imaging standard for the visualization of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa), since a lowPCa detection rate is reported for B TRUS. The aim of this study was to assess the visibility of MRI lesions on B TRUS and to determine which factors may influence the visibility on B TRUS.Material and methods: 142 men with 148 lesions reported on mpMRI underwent a B TRUS/mpMRI fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate and were included in this retrospective study. During the biopsy, images were obtained and stored in the institution’s PACS. These images were reviewed by two radiologists to determine, whether an mpMRI lesion was or was not visible on B TRUS.Results: Overall 92 from 148 mpMRI lesions (62.2%) were visible on B TRUS. The location of the lesion in the prostate, the PIRADS classification of the lesions and the size of the lesion had no significant influence on the visibility on B TRUS. Only the prostate volume had a significant influence on visibility: in smaller prostates significantly more lesions were visible on B TRUS than in large glands (p+0.041; 45.1 ml vs 54 ml).Conclusion: The use of newer high-end ultrasound units as well as experience gained from fusion biopsies enables us to see 62.2 % of all suspicious mpMRI lesions on B TRUS. B TRUS images merit a thorough examination during a conventional biopsy setting.

MRI targeted biopsy dramatically increases detection of clinically significant prostate cancer while reducing the risk of indolent cancer detection.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 108-108
Author(s):  
Michael Ahdoot ◽  
Amir H Lebastchi ◽  
Sandeep Gharam ◽  
Patrick H Gomella ◽  
John Dibianco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
Grade Group ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Sextant Biopsy ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Clinically Significant

108 Background: MRI fusion prostate biopsy has been shown to improve detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, however the degree of this benefit is poorly characterized in large clinical trials. Methods: 1750 MRI targeted plus sextant biopsies were performed in 1742 male patients from 2007 to 2017. Patient demographics, PSA, prostate volume, primary and secondary Gleason scores, Johns Hopkins Grade Groups, number of MRI targeted lesions, number of cores obtained, and biopsy yield were recorded. Results: The patient population consisted of men averaging 62.9-year-old (36-86) with a mean PSA 9.6ng/mL, and prostate volume of 59.2 ml. A total of 804 cancers were detected on sextant biopsy and 839 were detected on MRI targeted biopsy. Relative to targeted biopsy, sextant biopsy detected only significantly more Gleason 6 disease (14% vs 21.5%, p < 0.0001) than targeted biopsy. Targeted biopsy detected more Gleason 7 (21% vs 16.6%, p = 0.0009) and Gleason 8-10 (13.4% vs 9.4%). Additionally, Gleason 7 sub-stratification demonstrated substantially more Gleason 4+3 detection in targeted group vs sextant biopsy (4% vs 0.5%, p < 0.0001). When stratified by Grade Group targeted biopsy detected 76% more Grade Group 3-5 cancers (p < 0.0001) and 17.7% less Gleason Group 1-2 cancers (p < 0.0001). Only 1.7% of Grade Group 3-5 cancers were detected on sextant biopsy alone, where as 15.7% of Grade Group 3-5 cancers were detected on targeted biopsy alone. Conclusions: MRI targeted biopsy significantly increases the likelihood of detecting clinically significant cancer and decreases the risk of indolent cancer detection. These finding strongly support the use of MRI targeted biopsy when possible.

scholarly journals The importance of surgical access in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer and abnormal prostate anatomy

2022 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 32-40
Author(s):  
A. V. Zyryanov ◽  
A. S. Surikov ◽  
A. A. Keln ◽  
A. V. Ponomarev ◽  
V. G. Sobenin
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Robotic Prostatectomy ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Open Prostatectomy ◽  
Large Prostate ◽  
Blood Loss Volume

Background. The increased volume of the prostate in patients with confirmed prostate cancer (pc) is observed in 10 % of cases. The limitations of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy associated with large prostate volume and obstructive symptoms define radical prostatectomy (Rp) as the only possible treatment for prostate cancer in these patients. The purpose of the study was to determine the importance of the surgical approach in radical prostatectomy in patients with abnormal anatomy of the prostate. Material and methods. The study group consisted of patients with a prostate volume of more than 80 cm3 (n=40) who underwent a robot prostatectomy. The comparison group was represented by patients also selected by the prostate volume ≥ 80 cm3, who underwent classical open prostatectomy (n=44). The groups were comparable in age and psa level. The average prostate volume in the study group was 112.2 ± 26 cm 3(80–195 cm 3). The average prostate volume in the comparison group was 109.8 ± 18.7 cm3 (80–158 cm 3) (р>0.05). Both groups had favorable morphological characteristics. Results. The average surgery time difference was 65 minutes in favor of the open prostatectomy (p<0.05). The average blood loss volume in the study group was 282.5 ± 227.5 ml (50–1000 ml). The average blood loss volume in the group with open prostatectomy was 505.7 ± 382.3 ml (50–2000 ml). Positive surgical margin in the robotic prostatectomy was not detected, at 6.9 % in the group with open prostatectomy (p<0.05). According to the criterion of urinary continence, the best results were obtained in the group of robotic prostatectomy (p<0.05). Overall and relapse-free 5-year survival did not show a statistically significant difference. Conclusion. The use of robotic prostatectomy in a group of patients with a large prostate volume (≥ 80 cm3) allows us to achieve better functional and oncological outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document